EPTStarcraft 2 vs. Diablo 3 - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
StorrZerg
United States13922 Posts
| ||
|
[DUF]MethodMan
Germany1716 Posts
| ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
Diablo 3 is just made for the fun-factor more than anything else, which is why i'll probably enjoy it more than SC2, you can just sit down and have fun without having to invest alot of hours in order to become "good". | ||
|
Cephi
Canada21 Posts
StarCraft is where it's at | ||
|
ToT)OjKa(
Korea (South)2437 Posts
No one to tell us no Or where to go Or say we're only dreaming | ||
|
WolfStar
United Kingdom155 Posts
Wolf. | ||
|
HooHa!
United States688 Posts
On June 17 2009 14:57 travis wrote: lol i hate to say it but im more excited about d3 im too old for sc2... don't have the super competitive spirit anymore pff you aren't that old, my brother is a week older than you and he will probably play SC2. In fact even our other older brothers will probably play. You still got a good run left in you. I won't be able to play either game for a couple years, but I think that will give time for sc2 to breathe. | ||
|
sudo.era
United States300 Posts
That being said, I look forward to SC2 a good deal more. It'll probably be the only game I play until D3 comes out. | ||
|
CrimsonLotus
Colombia1123 Posts
StarCraft's appeal is all about competitive gaming, and i think this is going to suffer because of MSB, automining, autocast, etc, no matter what Blizzard does. They may soften its impact, but i still believe that SCII's competitive appeal will be something like 70% or 80% of Broodwar's, while i have no reason to believe that DIII wont be better in every aspect than DII, given that the game is based more around leveling up, collecting powerful items, trading them, cooperative play and just a very small competitive aspect wich i dont will suffer at all with this new game. So, despite my preference for SC2, i believe that DIII will be the better sequel. | ||
|
Chuiu
3470 Posts
Starcraft 2 because even if the melee sucks the mapping community won't. There's a huge lineup of SC mappers waiting to get their hands on it that never even touched WC3. | ||
|
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13922 Posts
| ||
|
KasPra
Estonia983 Posts
On June 17 2009 22:19 [DUF]MethodMan wrote: Diablo 2 already was shit compared to the first part. Seeing how Blizzard more and more caters to skilless newbies Diablo 3 will be even less Hack'n'Slay, but more stupidly running around collecting items. No thx. Well aren't you a negative nancy. Im more excited for starcraft II of course but without any doubt im gonna buy them both when they come out  | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66366 Posts
| ||
|
rytas
Sweden116 Posts
 It just feels that SC2 will either hit or miss, either awesome or uninteresting. Maybe one of the expansions will make it awesome if it "fail" from the start tho.. | ||
|
isleyofthenorth
Austria894 Posts
[x] starcraft 2 | ||
|
MagisterMan
Sweden525 Posts
| ||
|
Vharox
United States1037 Posts
On June 17 2009 22:25 ToT)OjKa( wrote: D3 for me. There are some things about SC2 that i don't like but D3 is a whole new world, a new fantastic point of view No one to tell us no Or where to go Or say we're only dreaming | ||
|
Elegance
Canada917 Posts
| ||
|
shenlong
219 Posts
| ||
| ||
