• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:38
CEST 20:38
KST 03:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy8uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event17Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments7[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
Is there a way to see if 2 accounts=1 person? #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ New season has just come in ladder StarCraft player reflex TE scores BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI The year 2050
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Biochemical Cost of Gami…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 699 users

Stats: KeSPA's Custodian - Rank 3 - Road to BlizzCon

Forum Index > SC2 General
115 CommentsPost a Reply
Normal

Stats: KeSPA's Custodian - Rank 3 - Road to BlizzCon

Text byTL.net ESPORTS
Graphics byshiroiusagi
October 23rd, 2017 10:01 GMT
Photo Credit: Shayla
Stats
Kim Dae Yeob


KeSPA's Custodian


by mizenhauer


October 16, 2016.

It’s the day the troubled relationship between KeSPA and StarCraft II came to an end. It began in tempestuous waters, with heated words and a begrudging acceptance that the organization came late to the party; it ended in quiet defeat, with little more than a whimper as they retreated into the night.

KeSPA helped transform the original StarCraft into a cultural phenomenon by giving it legitimacy and corporate backing, but now its descendant would have to live without such support. Gone was Proleague and with it the structure of team houses and the promise of a safe salary. Those who labored in the system had watched their peers fly through high school and university; whether they were anxiety ridden or zealously hopeful, the discarded players bravely embarked into the new age, never having been given a choice.

"Stats is exactly what KeSPA had in mind when they established the team house environment."
One year later, it’s hard to remember the days when players lined up opposite one another fighting for sponsors and comrades instead of personal glory. That’s partly because 2017 has been so special in terms of how players have adjusted to the post-KeSPA era. We’ve witnessed the resurgence of (Z)soO, the meteoric rise of (Z)Rogue, the dominance of (T)INnoVation and, after a brief interruption, the breathtaking stylings of (Z)Dark. And, of course, the humdrum consistency of (P)Stats.

The current stars leading the scene come off as individuals with aspirations and nuance as opposed to conservative macro players rolling off the assembly line. Sure INnoVation is a former Proleague ace and once embodied such play, but he quit on his team in 2016 out of slothfulness and disinterest. soO’s freakish mechanics are exactly the sort of sublime genius one identifies with KeSPA players, but his gripes with SK Telecom are well documented. Our newest champion Rogue was raised in the team house environment, but he always felt like an outsider that complied just enough to get by. Dark took advantage of what SKT was offering, but the eSF scoundrel never allowed the training to overwrite his DNA.

And then there’s Stats. Hard working, loyal, humble and focused. Adaptable and creative, but not erratic and illogical, Stats is exactly what KeSPA had in mind when they established the team house environment. KeSPA is gone and StarCraft II may very well be better off for it, but its last son Stats is still playing, still winning the old way.



Winrate


57.96% vs. Terran
57.06% vs. Protoss
55.27% vs. Zerg

Rank


Circuit Standings
1

WCS Points


12875



We’ve gotten to know Stats quite well over the years. We admire him for his tireless work ethic, the type of nose to the grindstone attitude we all wish we could embody. He has very few critics, if any, as people are drawn to his affable nature. Then there’s the indisputable fact that he’s talented, though he seems blissfully ignorant of how phenomenal those gifts are. He just keeps pushing himself harder and harder, going from Proleague regular to ace, to champion, avoiding the pitfalls of Kongdom along the way. He was never satisfied with his results and always strove for more. It’s what his fans love and respect about him. It’s why they look at him so fondly and cheer for him so fervently. They may not be shouting his name from the rooftops like supporters of other elite players, but they see something in Stats they can relate to: confirmation of the age old adage about hard work.

Stats has always been LotV’s brightest star even when publicity and scheduling connived to make him a wallflower. He’s made the semifinals of eleven premier events, winning GSL Season 1 and SSL Premier Season 2 within the last seven months. He’s shaped metas and defined matchups. He’s been an indefatigable force over the last two years, and he’s done it all under the shadow of his contemporaries. For someone who was reduced to the role of understudy for much of his time on KT Rolster, playing second fiddle was nothing new. KeSPA always had stars, but the system was structured in such a way that everyone was required to give it their all, even when some never even got to take the stage after years toiling away in the team house. Players like (P)Billowy got their moments in the sun, but there were far more B-Teamers like (Z)PenguiN or (T)DynaMite who never got a chance to shine. It almost seemed natural for Stats, someone who had to work from the ground floor up, to cede attention to Dark and (T)ByuN. Those players faded in time, supplanted by INnoVation, but Stats persevered.

KeSPA couldn’t teach every lesson. They could give players tools and structure, but an individual still had to take the next big step on their own if they wanted to achieve greatness. On KT, Stats stood besides (T)Flash and (P)Zest. If he wanted to inherit their legacy, he had a lot of work to do.

Stats was already a capable player when Legacy of the Void was released, but he was far from realizing his potential. His play was still rough around the edges. He lacked a greater understanding of the game, inevitably falling victim to rigid decision-making and a frail grasp on strategy as tournaments dragged on. He couldn’t dictate the pace of a game let alone manipulate the tides of a series, a deficiency which made a grand victory hard to come by. Riddled by hesitancy and uncertainty, he crumbled when the pressure was on.

It took another year of hard work before he began learning the lessons KeSPA couldn’t teach. Results started to pile up and although he lost his first Starleague finals to Dark, evidence of improvement was clear as day. He was seeing thing other players didn’t—for instance, how to fully exploit oracles against Zerg. He beat soO in GSL Season 1. He had learned to win. Whether it was with a deft timing or in a lengthy macro game, it didn’t matter. He could battle through the muck and come out the other side just as he could pioneer a comeback when in dire straits. Stats had gained the intangibles, the hidden teachings KeSPA could never advertise on one’s first tour of the team house.

Legacy of the Void has been a series of dramatically shifting landscapes, with most players failing to keep up. While (T)aLive, (T)Maru, ByuN and (Z)ByuL imitated Achilles with their brief, blinding moments of glory, Stats opted to be wily and grounded like Odysseus. Part of it has to be the resiliency gleaned from his time with KT Rolster. He never made excuses for himself and always kept improving. That’s the perspective with which he approaches the game to this day.

It’s hard to extrapolate what once was into the present but, looking at Stats, it's clear KeSPA’s values lives on. It’s through them that he’s become the greatest player of the last two years. Though overshadowed by Dark, ByuN and INnoVation, Stats was never in it for the attention. They may have shone far brighter, but they were really the ones standing in his shadow. Stats is KeSPA’s custodian, the pinnacle of the Korean model of humility, dedication and hard work. When he takes the BlizzCon stage, he does so with nearly fifteen years of history behind him. Champions like (T)NaDa, iloveoov, (T)Flash, (Z)Jaedong are arrayed behind him, those who strode KeSPA’s path before him. Stats will be fighting for himself and for their legacy, ready to carry the old ways to new glory.








Writer: mizenhauer
Editor: CosmicSpiral, Olli
Photo Credit: DreamHack, Shayla
Statistics: Aligulac
Facebook Twitter Reddit
TL+ Member
CynicalDeath
Profile Joined January 2012
Italy3408 Posts
October 23 2017 10:03 GMT
#2
...so Rogue ahead of Stats... mmm idk about this...
ModeratorSC2 LP Admin - My Life for Aiur - Let the Metal flow - @Cynical_Death
FataLe
Profile Joined November 2010
New Zealand4501 Posts
October 23 2017 10:06 GMT
#3
Okay it was one thing to put Neeb in front of a Korean (actually agreed with it though)

but this.. is too much imo.
hi. big fan.
Synchrx
Profile Joined September 2017
United Kingdom29 Posts
October 23 2017 10:10 GMT
#4
so Rogue #2 Inno #1? Surprised that you put Rogue ahead of Stats, I mean on current form Rogue's a champion but Stats has been so solid all year.
This, indeed, is the secret of the thing. This is why the demon of impermanence is beneficent. Because it is forgetting about things that renews their wonder.
Veluvian
Profile Joined December 2011
Bulgaria256 Posts
October 23 2017 10:14 GMT
#5
I remember Flash once said about Stats that he was very crazy, not so well disciplined guy in the team house and suddenly Stats became very stable and well organized with gaining more experience. Those words are 100% correct if we observe carefully how deep Stats evolved with the pro-gaming years. I clearly remember a match in proleague against SKT1 when he beat Soulkey who was in his top shape back in 2013 and then I said to myself that this guy will gain a Code S title for sure in the future. I'm very curious about his future.
Oz; MMA; Rain; sOs; Classic, Soulkey, TY, Dark
DieuCure
Profile Joined January 2017
France3713 Posts
October 23 2017 10:42 GMT
#6
On October 23 2017 19:03 CynicalDeath wrote:
...so Rogue ahead of Stats... mmm idk about this...


Yes he is, it's about his form, not about all the year ...
TL+ Member
AbouSV
Profile Joined October 2014
Germany1278 Posts
October 23 2017 10:55 GMT
#7
The top 3 is Z, P, T. The balance is perfect, no need for any change.
Makro
Profile Joined March 2011
France16890 Posts
October 23 2017 11:02 GMT
#8
enjoying all the reads so far

just waiting for innovation
Matthew 5:10 "Blessed are those who are persecuted because of shitposting, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven".
TL+ Member
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
October 23 2017 11:10 GMT
#9
On October 23 2017 19:55 AbouSV wrote:
The top 3 is Z, P, T. The balance is perfect, no need for any change.


#1 says zerg is OP though
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
Mun_Su
Profile Joined December 2012
France2063 Posts
October 23 2017 11:31 GMT
#10
good read again


On October 23 2017 19:55 AbouSV wrote:
The top 3 is Z, P, T. The balance is perfect, no need for any change.



get ready for massive changes xD

INno <3 - TY - Maru - Taeja - Rain <3 - Classic <3 - Stephano <3 - soO <3 - Soulkey - Dark - SERRAL =O / END REGION LOCK
EEk1TwEEk
Profile Joined June 2017
Russian Federation146 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 11:39:52
October 23 2017 11:35 GMT
#11
What? Stats should be #1!
I mean divide his points in half and he's still in WCS Global finals!! Consistent results in all 3 GSL's and other tournaments
wtf?
btw I am huge Rogue fan, okay?
This man suffers from a bad heart, but I have plenty of medicine.
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
October 23 2017 11:37 GMT
#12
Power Ranks are largely based on current form. Rogue and INnoVation have done better than Stats recently.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
October 23 2017 11:55 GMT
#13
Rogue #1 incoming
Neosteel Enthusiast
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 12:11:38
October 23 2017 12:03 GMT
#14
On October 23 2017 20:37 Olli wrote:
Power Ranks are largely based on current form. Rogue and INnoVation have done better than Stats recently.


Did they? Stats did better than Rogue in GSL S3 and came first in SSL. Unless by recently you mean only ST2

edit: I just realised how consistant Stat's improvement has been. Since the start of HoTS his results have improved each year without fault. Has he even reached his final form yet?
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
October 23 2017 12:05 GMT
#15
That writing was solid, but the last paragraph was fantastic.
Argonauta
Profile Joined July 2016
Spain4948 Posts
October 23 2017 12:24 GMT
#16
Is rogue the new Taeja?
Rogue | Maru | Scarlett | Trap
TL+ Member
beepbeeeeeeep
Profile Joined February 2017
145 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 12:31:57
October 23 2017 12:31 GMT
#17
On October 23 2017 19:10 Synchronize` wrote:
so Rogue #2 Inno #1? Surprised that you put Rogue ahead of Stats, I mean on current form Rogue's a champion but Stats has been so solid all year.


It's been initmated in a few of these power ranking articles that Rogue will be at #1
yht9657
Profile Joined December 2016
1810 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 12:41:18
October 23 2017 12:31 GMT
#18
When Kespa team disbanded and proleague ended it's easy for people to assume a player like Stats who devoted his entire career to the system would suffer the heaviest blow, yet he turned out to be one of least affected players and went on to reach the height of his career on his own, yet Zest, one with much more experience and success in individual tournaments slumped hard.

Irony as it goes.

P.S. still using "circuit standings" for KR players?
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 12:42 GMT
#19
I'll temper my comments the best I can. To have Stats ranked anything below 2nd is total absolute bullcrap! A travesty an abomination!

The guy had more WCS points than anybody ever has. He had 2700 more points than Innovation!

If we are going to base these rankings entirely on ST 2 then Hero should be 2nd right? Rogue and Hero 1 and 2?

Stats is a rock of Gibraltar to move in big tournaments. Players come along motivated and in great form and he still beats them.

GSL season 3 vs Rogue. This is all you need to know. Rogue was at the top of Korean ladder he needed that win much more than Stats so what happened? Stats won!

SSL premier season 2. Dark was in great form and had just beaten 2 Protoss players in the playoffs 4-2 over Dear and 4-2 over classic. He could not beat Stats.

Rogue > Stats is a joke!
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
October 23 2017 12:50 GMT
#20
On October 23 2017 21:42 Rolltide wrote:
I'll temper my comments the best I can. To have Stats ranked anything below 2nd is total absolute bullcrap! A travesty an abomination!


You're one funny poster.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 12:53 GMT
#21
As far as super recent form they both did poorly in Master's coliseum and Stats is 6-4 in his last 10 matches where Rogue is 6-3-1.

I know this is all in fun to provoke discussion and debate leading up to Blizzcon but the rankings have to be somewhat credible. I would have put Rogue 4th behind Inno, Stats and Dark.

Z3nith
Profile Joined October 2017
485 Posts
October 23 2017 12:57 GMT
#22
Honestly, Rogue was not even being considered among the best until he won the super tournament to now have him as a favourite above Stats and possibly innovation is just wrong even if he is in good form.
AbouSV
Profile Joined October 2014
Germany1278 Posts
October 23 2017 13:13 GMT
#23
On October 23 2017 21:53 Rolltide wrote:
As far as super recent form they both did poorly in Master's coliseum and Stats is 6-4 in his last 10 matches where Rogue is 6-3-1.

I know this is all in fun to provoke discussion and debate leading up to Blizzcon but the rankings have to be somewhat credible. I would have put Rogue 4th behind Inno, Stats and Dark.



Rogue has a draw? Where? Against who?
bulya
Profile Joined February 2016
Israel386 Posts
October 23 2017 13:16 GMT
#24
I know that Stats has a large fan base, and I like him as well. But if I have to calm my emotions and be objective then not only I put Rogue above him, but herO is above Stats as well by means of form.

I know that herO doesn't have many fans, and some don't even like his play style (I'm one among them), but by means of form and chances of winning it all herO has more then Stats.
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
October 23 2017 13:19 GMT
#25
On October 23 2017 21:57 Z3nith wrote:
Honestly, Rogue was not even being considered among the best until he won the super tournament to now have him as a favourite above Stats and possibly innovation is just wrong even if he is in good form.

Someone is forgetting IEM Shanghai.
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 13:25 GMT
#26
Rogue's last 10 matches. Some of them are only 1 or 2 maps...

http://aligulac.com/players/1662-Rogue/
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 13:32 GMT
#27
I know that Stats has a large fan base, and I like him as well. But if I have to calm my emotions and be objective then not only I put Rogue above him, but herO is above Stats as well by means of form.


Since when is it only about form? And what does that mean how a guy played this week only?

At Master's coliseum 2 these are the matches Rogue played.

In group. 2-0 vs TIME, 1-1 vs Elazer, 0-2 vs Classic, vs Byun was a wash because Byun did not show.

Then in the rd of 12 he was eliminated by Hero 3-1.

So what is so damned impressive about that? That's top 2 in the world? That is the last significant tournament he played in!

So classic should be 2nd then? Or first? Hero won that tournament.
Jimmon
Profile Joined May 2011
United States112 Posts
October 23 2017 13:33 GMT
#28
I love the article, yet I feel like KeSpa overshadowed Stat's actual accomplishments. Of course people uphold KeSpa with high regard, but I felt like there was more KeSpa hyping then actual Stats hyping.

Overall, I really liked the verbage and opener/ender.

I love LOveRH
Z3nith
Profile Joined October 2017
485 Posts
October 23 2017 13:35 GMT
#29
On October 23 2017 22:19 Boggyb wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 23 2017 21:57 Z3nith wrote:
Honestly, Rogue was not even being considered among the best until he won the super tournament to now have him as a favourite above Stats and possibly innovation is just wrong even if he is in good form.

Someone is forgetting IEM Shanghai.


Ah yes IEM shanghai beats out an SSL and GSL title and quite a few ro4s etc. Sure. Not to mention for innovation the GSL, GSL vs the world and an SSL.
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
October 23 2017 13:51 GMT
#30
On October 23 2017 22:35 Z3nith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 23 2017 22:19 Boggyb wrote:
On October 23 2017 21:57 Z3nith wrote:
Honestly, Rogue was not even being considered among the best until he won the super tournament to now have him as a favourite above Stats and possibly innovation is just wrong even if he is in good form.

Someone is forgetting IEM Shanghai.


Ah yes IEM shanghai beats out an SSL and GSL title and quite a few ro4s etc. Sure. Not to mention for innovation the GSL, GSL vs the world and an SSL.

Look at the last 4 months and keep in mind that GSL vs The World was an invitational tournament. Unless tournament wins don't mean much in your book, the only people who can compare with Rogue are Innovation and Neeb.
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15967 Posts
October 23 2017 13:51 GMT
#31
Some people don't understand the purpose of a powerrank.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
October 23 2017 14:04 GMT
#32
On October 23 2017 22:51 Charoisaur wrote:
Some people don't understand the purpose of a powerrank.


I think people overrate trophies when it comes to them. If you just rank everyone based on their finish in the latest tournament then what's the point? Given how rare back-to-back championships are, it's clearly not the right way to go about it
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
DieuCure
Profile Joined January 2017
France3713 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 14:20:58
October 23 2017 14:20 GMT
#33
On October 23 2017 22:35 Z3nith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 23 2017 22:19 Boggyb wrote:
On October 23 2017 21:57 Z3nith wrote:
Honestly, Rogue was not even being considered among the best until he won the super tournament to now have him as a favourite above Stats and possibly innovation is just wrong even if he is in good form.

Someone is forgetting IEM Shanghai.


Ah yes IEM shanghai beats out an SSL and GSL title and quite a few ro4s etc. Sure. Not to mention for innovation the GSL, GSL vs the world and an SSL.


Yes, IEM Shanghai > SSL.

And GSL+GslvsW > IEM+GSLST > SSL.
TL+ Member
fLyiNgDroNe
Profile Joined September 2005
Belgium4010 Posts
October 23 2017 14:56 GMT
#34
your stories are great! Just lacking some innovation.
Drone is a way of living
VengefulTree
Profile Joined May 2014
Canada637 Posts
October 23 2017 15:06 GMT
#35
On October 23 2017 21:50 Olli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 23 2017 21:42 Rolltide wrote:
I'll temper my comments the best I can. To have Stats ranked anything below 2nd is total absolute bullcrap! A travesty an abomination!


You're one funny poster.


That's my new quote, it's just so theatrical and dramatic
"I'll temper my comments the best I can. To have Stats ranked anything below 2nd is total absolute bullcrap! A travesty an abomination!" - Rolltide | "When a foreign Terran is about to win, the entire universe conspires against him" - Paulo Coelho
Poopi
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France12886 Posts
October 23 2017 15:08 GMT
#36
Is that a bad joke?
The guy is #1 WCS and just won SSL yet he is ranked below Rogue?

That doesn't make any sense :x.
WriterMaru
BLinD-RawR
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
ALLEYCAT BLUES50123 Posts
October 23 2017 15:11 GMT
#37
lol I don't care about the ranking, Kim Dae Yeob will crush everyone
Brood War EICWoo Jung Ho, never forget.| Twitter: @BLinDRawR
TL+ Member
franzji
Profile Joined September 2013
United States583 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 15:29:08
October 23 2017 15:17 GMT
#38
any sports analyst with basic understandings of ranking skilled players based on overall results would put stats above 3rd place, and more likely to win blizzcon, only TL would be biased or stupid enough or selective enough to make a ranking off of two tournaments.

I mean, we'll just have to see.
Twinkle Toes
Profile Joined May 2012
United States3605 Posts
October 23 2017 15:31 GMT
#39
Stats is a stable player, no ebb and flow in his game or performance. He is the perfect balance of control and aggression. And he always manages to preform well in big stages.
Bisu - INnoVation - Dark - Rogue - Stats
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States13974 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 16:07:34
October 23 2017 15:56 GMT
#40
Reminds me of Man vs Machine, the drg v inno ro8 preview...well done miz, it certainly lived up to the hype.
Kaina + Drones Linkcro Summon Cupsie Yummy Way
SetGuitarsToKill
Profile Blog Joined December 2013
Canada28396 Posts
October 23 2017 16:46 GMT
#41
Rogue is just better than Stats, guys. Stop trying to deny it
Community News"As long as you have a warp prism you can't be bad at harassment" - Maru | @SetGuitars2Kill
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 16:49:31
October 23 2017 16:46 GMT
#42
Lmao at all the raging Stats fanboys. Blizzcon starts in a few days and your favorite player can demonstrate exactly where he belongs in the PR.

PRs measure current form, and Stats peaked around March. Some people just can't understand that, I guess. If TL is wrong then Stats can prove it himself.

I'm guessing Rogue will be second and Inno first, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the other way around.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States13974 Posts
October 23 2017 16:54 GMT
#43
On October 24 2017 01:46 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
Rogue is just better than Stats, guys. Stop trying to deny it

Lol

User was warned for this post
Kaina + Drones Linkcro Summon Cupsie Yummy Way
franzji
Profile Joined September 2013
United States583 Posts
October 23 2017 17:15 GMT
#44
On October 24 2017 01:46 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
Rogue is just better than Stats, guys. Stop trying to deny it


lul

User was warned for this post
FrkFrJss
Profile Joined April 2015
Canada1205 Posts
October 23 2017 17:23 GMT
#45
On October 23 2017 23:20 DieuCure wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 23 2017 22:35 Z3nith wrote:
On October 23 2017 22:19 Boggyb wrote:
On October 23 2017 21:57 Z3nith wrote:
Honestly, Rogue was not even being considered among the best until he won the super tournament to now have him as a favourite above Stats and possibly innovation is just wrong even if he is in good form.

Someone is forgetting IEM Shanghai.


Ah yes IEM shanghai beats out an SSL and GSL title and quite a few ro4s etc. Sure. Not to mention for innovation the GSL, GSL vs the world and an SSL.


Yes, IEM Shanghai > SSL.

And GSL+GslvsW > IEM+GSLST > SSL.


Given the interesting format of SSL, I can understand IEM and ST > SSL, but Stats won both a GSL and an SSL title.

Also, I don't see how Stats peaked in March as his SSL victory was in Late September.

I don't really care what the order is for the top 3-4 since they're pretty close together anyways, but it is interesting to talk about form, where an SSL should be higher than an ST. Not to mention, Stats recently swept through all the Terrans at Blizzcon in an Olimoleague.
"Keep Moving Forward" - Walt Disney
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 17:28 GMT
#46
PRs measure current form, and Stats peaked around March. Some people just can't understand that, I guess. If TL is wrong then Stats can prove it himself.


If Stats was only good around March when he won GSL how did he end up with over 12000 points? That is sick you are aware of that right? Hero ran away with the points in 2015 with just 7900, Dark clearly won it last year with 9400.

And why was a horrible out of form Stats able to beat a super stud in form Rogue in GSL s 3? Why was a horrible out of form Stats able to beat a surging Dark in SSL s 2?

This is a guy who had his ticket punched to Blizzcon on March 26th yet keeps going deep in tournament after tournament.

Nobody has been this good over an entire year. Nobody! Not MC, MVP, Life, nobody!



Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 17:31:57
October 23 2017 17:31 GMT
#47
Mvp and Zest were both better in 2011 and 2014 respectively. INnoVation was better this year too.

And nobody's arguing that Stats is horribly out of form. Just that Rogue's recent form is a bit better.

You continue to exaggerate massively.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
October 23 2017 17:35 GMT
#48
Some people have trouble grasping the concept of "peak," I guess.

Stats peaked in March, after he won GSL S1. This means that Stats was at his strongest, relative to the rest of the competitive scene, in March. At that time, he was undisputed as the best player in the world, with TY being second.

Peaking in March does not mean Stats is trash right now. Winning SSL S2 shows that Stats is still plenty strong. But arguing that Stats is undisputed as the best player in the world right now is, bluntly put, idiocy (though some people here are still trying). Dark, herO, Rogue, Inno, all these players have strong cases for being as strong or stronger than Stats is right now.

Stats peaked in March.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 17:37 GMT
#49
What Stats did in beating Dark in SSL was extraordinary. It was a 4-3 win and Dark had to pull off a miracle in one map to make it that close.

Dark handled Dear and Classic 4-2. He had all that practice against Protoss players. Classic was super motivated he needed that win to get to Blizzcon. Despite everything going his way Dark could not beat Stats. Stats was at another level.

Musicus
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany23576 Posts
October 23 2017 17:39 GMT
#50
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!
Maru and Serral are probably top 5.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
October 23 2017 17:43 GMT
#51
On October 24 2017 02:39 Musicus wrote:
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!

???

Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
SetGuitarsToKill
Profile Blog Joined December 2013
Canada28396 Posts
October 23 2017 17:44 GMT
#52
I was just talking to Olli in private and he says he'll demote Stats to 16th if anyone else bitches
Community News"As long as you have a warp prism you can't be bad at harassment" - Maru | @SetGuitars2Kill
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
October 23 2017 17:44 GMT
#53
On October 24 2017 02:44 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
I was just talking to Olli in private and he says he'll demote Stats to 16th if anyone else bitches

Ayyyy go for it.

I want to feast on Stats-fanboy salt and tears.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
October 23 2017 17:48 GMT
#54
I mean that conversation never happened, but I'm ready to try and see what happens
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 17:50 GMT
#55
Mvp and Zest were both better in 2011 and 2014 respectively. INnoVation was better this year too.

And nobody's arguing that Stats is horribly out of form. Just that Rogue's recent form is a bit better.

You continue to exaggerate massively.


How was Zest better in 2014? You are making that up. Zest won a GSL and a Kespa. How does that trump a GSL and an SSL? He finished third in points behind Bomber and Hyun with 5800. Stats has over 12000. Innovation had an absolutely monster year and Stats still has more than 2000 points.

FYI you gain points by playing well. This is not a figment of somebody's imagination. This is not an opinion of how he played. You EARN points by finishing high in significant tournaments.

Stats finished in the top 4 in 6 major tournaments. 6! He won 2 of them and finished 2nd in 2 of them. That is sick! 4 of those tournaments occurred after March.

Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 17:52 GMT
#56
GSL season 3 Sept 6th 2017.

Stats vs Rogue. Who won?

Who won?

Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 17:55 GMT
#57
Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.


Who won SSL s 2? Who was the one who eliminated Rogue in GSL 3? My god you have the nerve to brag that Rogue made the round of 8 in GSL 3?

User was warned for this post
Musicus
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany23576 Posts
October 23 2017 17:56 GMT
#58
On October 24 2017 02:43 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 02:39 Musicus wrote:
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!

???

Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.

Yeah well Stats was in GSL ro4, won SSL and an lost 2-3 to soO in ST.

So there is also a perfectly legitimate case for ranking Stats above Rogue.

So either Rogue is above both or below both, but not inbetween imo.
Maru and Serral are probably top 5.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:03:20
October 23 2017 17:59 GMT
#59
On October 24 2017 02:56 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 02:43 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:39 Musicus wrote:
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!

???

Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.

Yeah well Stats was in GSL ro4, won SSL and an lost 2-3 to soO in ST.

So there is also a perfectly legitimate case for ranking Stats above Rogue.

So either Rogue is above both or below both, but not inbetween imo.

There is indeed a perfectly legitimate case for Stats > Rogue. There is also a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Stats, and a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Inno.

Which case actually turns out to be reality is up to the TL writers. They chose Rogue > Stats, and we will find out tomorrow whether they chose Rogue > Inno or Inno > Rogue.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Mun_Su
Profile Joined December 2012
France2063 Posts
October 23 2017 18:02 GMT
#60
On October 24 2017 00:56 Cricketer12 wrote:
Reminds me of Man vs Machine, the drg v inno ro8 preview...well done miz, it certainly lived up to the hype.


I can't found it, do someone have the link ?
INno <3 - TY - Maru - Taeja - Rain <3 - Classic <3 - Stephano <3 - soO <3 - Soulkey - Dark - SERRAL =O / END REGION LOCK
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
October 23 2017 18:02 GMT
#61
On October 24 2017 03:02 Mun_Su wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 00:56 Cricketer12 wrote:
Reminds me of Man vs Machine, the drg v inno ro8 preview...well done miz, it certainly lived up to the hype.


I can't found it, do someone have the link ?

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/467181-code-s-ro8-day-1-preview-season-3#Newsintro1
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 18:03 GMT
#62
There is no legit case for Rogue > Stats unless you are only counting one tournament.
Musicus
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany23576 Posts
October 23 2017 18:04 GMT
#63
On October 24 2017 02:59 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 02:56 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:43 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:39 Musicus wrote:
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!

???

Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.

Yeah well Stats was in GSL ro4, won SSL and an lost 2-3 to soO in ST.

So there is also a perfectly legitimate case for ranking Stats above Rogue.

So either Rogue is above both or below both, but not inbetween imo.

There is indeed a perfectly legitimate case for Stats > Rogue. There is also a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Stats, and a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Inno.

Which case actually turns out to be reality is up to the TL writers. They chose Rogue > Stats, and we will find out tomorrow whether they chose Rogue > Inno or Inno > Rogue.

But there is no perfeclty legitimate case for Inno > Rogue > Stats. That result only exists if you use double standards or different criteria when comparing Rogue and Stats and Rogue and Inno.
Maru and Serral are probably top 5.
Pandain
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States12989 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:11:22
October 23 2017 18:09 GMT
#64
Wow it's been a while since I've seen such a huge adamant fanboy.

I'm not complaining even though I disagree, I'm a statsboy myself :popcorn:

More on topic, even though I have strong opinions on the matter, you can justify a lot of different top 5 rankings between stats, dark, hero, inno, and rogue and still be legitimate. Theres no harm in diversity of opinion .
Gurbak
Profile Joined January 2017
France622 Posts
October 23 2017 18:10 GMT
#65
please inno 2 and rogue 1 for more Rolltide's salt
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:17:15
October 23 2017 18:11 GMT
#66
On October 24 2017 03:04 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 02:59 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:56 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:43 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:39 Musicus wrote:
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!

???

Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.

Yeah well Stats was in GSL ro4, won SSL and an lost 2-3 to soO in ST.

So there is also a perfectly legitimate case for ranking Stats above Rogue.

So either Rogue is above both or below both, but not inbetween imo.

There is indeed a perfectly legitimate case for Stats > Rogue. There is also a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Stats, and a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Inno.

Which case actually turns out to be reality is up to the TL writers. They chose Rogue > Stats, and we will find out tomorrow whether they chose Rogue > Inno or Inno > Rogue.

But there is no perfeclty legitimate case for Inno > Rogue > Stats. That result only exists if you use double standards or different criteria when comparing Rogue and Stats and Rogue and Inno.

???

Of course there is a legitimate case for Inno > Rogue > Stats. Such a case would depend on your definition of "recent." Stats won SSL S2, true enough, but the only other tournament he won before that in 2017 was GSL S1 back in March. On the other hand both Rogue and Inno have tournaments more recently than Stats. Including IEM Shanghai and GSL vs the World, for example, would be a perfectly legitimate way to justify Inno > Rogue > Stats.

Point being, the top players (Rogue, Stats, Inno, Dark, herO) are all close enough that it is not at all difficult to justify ordering them in pretty much any arbitrary order. Everyone has their own subjective weighting of the myriad criteria that go into a PR, and that produces a multitude of subjective rankings, many of which are perfectly legitimate. Only fanatically biased fanboys will bitch and moan about their favorite player being one rank too low or some other trivial shit, and only myopic ones would claim a different PR is somehow wrong simply because they disagree.

I am a big Stats fan myself, but you don't see me complaining about his rank. If he were ranked #2 or #1 I would be happier, but there's nothing illegitimate about him being #3 either.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Musicus
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany23576 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:18:25
October 23 2017 18:17 GMT
#67
On October 24 2017 03:11 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 03:04 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:59 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:56 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:43 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:39 Musicus wrote:
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!

???

Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.

Yeah well Stats was in GSL ro4, won SSL and an lost 2-3 to soO in ST.

So there is also a perfectly legitimate case for ranking Stats above Rogue.

So either Rogue is above both or below both, but not inbetween imo.

There is indeed a perfectly legitimate case for Stats > Rogue. There is also a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Stats, and a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Inno.

Which case actually turns out to be reality is up to the TL writers. They chose Rogue > Stats, and we will find out tomorrow whether they chose Rogue > Inno or Inno > Rogue.

But there is no perfeclty legitimate case for Inno > Rogue > Stats. That result only exists if you use double standards or different criteria when comparing Rogue and Stats and Rogue and Inno.

???

Of course there is a legitimate case for Inno > Rogue > Stats. Such a case would depend on your definition of "recent." Stats won SSL S2, true enough, but the only other tournament he won before that in 2017 was GSL S1 back in March. On the other hand both Rogue and Inno have tournaments more recently than Stats. Including IEM Shanghai and GSL vs the World, for example, would be a perfectly legitimate way to justify Inno > Rogue > Stats.

Point being, the top players (Rogue, Stats, Inno, Dark, herO) are all close enough that it is not at all difficult to justify ordering them in pretty much any arbitrary order. Only fanatically biased fanboys will bitch and moan about their favorite player being one rank too low or some other trivial shit.

Not really though, since I personally like Rogue more than Stats. He is the reason I've had a JAGW flair for years. I don't care about Maru or sOs.

And you can not include GSL vs the world, since it was a fan vote and Rogue didn't even play. Either you include IEM Shanghai and say it's recent form and Rogue is above everybody, or you say best overall this year and Stats and Inno are both above Rogue.

That's the point.
Maru and Serral are probably top 5.
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
October 23 2017 18:20 GMT
#68
On October 24 2017 02:50 Rolltide wrote:
Show nested quote +
Mvp and Zest were both better in 2011 and 2014 respectively. INnoVation was better this year too.

And nobody's arguing that Stats is horribly out of form. Just that Rogue's recent form is a bit better.

You continue to exaggerate massively.


How was Zest better in 2014? You are making that up. Zest won a GSL and a Kespa. How does that trump a GSL and an SSL? He finished third in points behind Bomber and Hyun with 5800. Stats has over 12000. Innovation had an absolutely monster year and Stats still has more than 2000 points.

FYI you gain points by playing well. This is not a figment of somebody's imagination. This is not an opinion of how he played. You EARN points by finishing high in significant tournaments.

Stats finished in the top 4 in 6 major tournaments. 6! He won 2 of them and finished 2nd in 2 of them. That is sick! 4 of those tournaments occurred after March.



Zest was better in 2014 — he won 3 Korean tournaments (GSL, GSL Global Championship, KeSPA Cup), got second at IEM Toronto, all-killed SKT in a Proleague Round Finals, played a huge part in KT winning the season. Reached the quarterfinals or better of every single tournament he attended leading up to BlizzCon. Got to the semifinals of another GSL where he was one map away from the finals.

WCS points don't tell the whole story. But arguing with you is and has always been pointless. You won't listen to rational arguments or people explaining to you that other metrics than the ones you employ are at work here.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:27:40
October 23 2017 18:22 GMT
#69
On October 24 2017 03:17 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 03:11 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 03:04 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:59 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:56 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:43 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 02:39 Musicus wrote:
I am fine with this position since it seems to be about recent form.

But that also means that Rogue has to be #1, since his recent form is the best, and even all the pros agree that he is the best. If Inno gets to be #1 now, because he was better overall this year, Stats should've been above Rogue as well.

So Rogue now has to be #1 or it lost all meaning and I will just forget about this PR. That would of course not mean that I can not just enjoy the articles without caring about the ranking.

Thanks for another awesome piece of writing!

???

Most recent tournaments were GSL, SSL, and GSL Super Tournament. Inno won GSL, got 5th in SSL, and semifinals in ST. Rogue got Ro8 in GSL, wasn't even in SSL Premier, and won ST.

There's a perfectly legitimate case for Inno > Rogue based on recent tournaments.

Yeah well Stats was in GSL ro4, won SSL and an lost 2-3 to soO in ST.

So there is also a perfectly legitimate case for ranking Stats above Rogue.

So either Rogue is above both or below both, but not inbetween imo.

There is indeed a perfectly legitimate case for Stats > Rogue. There is also a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Stats, and a perfectly legitimate case for Rogue > Inno.

Which case actually turns out to be reality is up to the TL writers. They chose Rogue > Stats, and we will find out tomorrow whether they chose Rogue > Inno or Inno > Rogue.

But there is no perfeclty legitimate case for Inno > Rogue > Stats. That result only exists if you use double standards or different criteria when comparing Rogue and Stats and Rogue and Inno.

???

Of course there is a legitimate case for Inno > Rogue > Stats. Such a case would depend on your definition of "recent." Stats won SSL S2, true enough, but the only other tournament he won before that in 2017 was GSL S1 back in March. On the other hand both Rogue and Inno have tournaments more recently than Stats. Including IEM Shanghai and GSL vs the World, for example, would be a perfectly legitimate way to justify Inno > Rogue > Stats.

Point being, the top players (Rogue, Stats, Inno, Dark, herO) are all close enough that it is not at all difficult to justify ordering them in pretty much any arbitrary order. Only fanatically biased fanboys will bitch and moan about their favorite player being one rank too low or some other trivial shit.

Not really though, since I personally like Rogue more than Stats. He is the reason I've had a JAGW flair for years. I don't care about Maru or sOs.

And you can not include GSL vs the world, since it was a fan vote and Rogue didn't even play. Either you include IEM Shanghai and say it's recent form and Rogue is above everybody, or you say best overall this year and Stats and Inno are both above Rogue.

That's the point.

Including GSL vs the World or not is exactly the kind of subjective weighting that I described in my earlier post. You say it is not valid because it was an invitational. Another person can say differently because there were undeniably a lot of talented players in attendance. Either is perfectly legitimate, and both produce perfectly legitimate rankings that just so happen to be different (like Inno > Rogue > Stats).
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
October 23 2017 18:23 GMT
#70
GSL vs the World being an invitational doesn't invalidate the play that happened there.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:27:01
October 23 2017 18:25 GMT
#71
On October 24 2017 03:20 Olli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 02:50 Rolltide wrote:
Mvp and Zest were both better in 2011 and 2014 respectively. INnoVation was better this year too.

And nobody's arguing that Stats is horribly out of form. Just that Rogue's recent form is a bit better.

You continue to exaggerate massively.


How was Zest better in 2014? You are making that up. Zest won a GSL and a Kespa. How does that trump a GSL and an SSL? He finished third in points behind Bomber and Hyun with 5800. Stats has over 12000. Innovation had an absolutely monster year and Stats still has more than 2000 points.

FYI you gain points by playing well. This is not a figment of somebody's imagination. This is not an opinion of how he played. You EARN points by finishing high in significant tournaments.

Stats finished in the top 4 in 6 major tournaments. 6! He won 2 of them and finished 2nd in 2 of them. That is sick! 4 of those tournaments occurred after March.



WCS points don't tell the whole story. But arguing with you is and has always been pointless. You won't listen to rational arguments or people explaining to you that other metrics than the ones you employ are at work here.

Savage.

That being said, I don't exactly disagree....I thought it more in keeping with decorum to politely disregard the irrational posts, though.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Musicus
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany23576 Posts
October 23 2017 18:28 GMT
#72
On October 24 2017 03:23 Olli wrote:
GSL vs the World being an invitational doesn't invalidate the play that happened there.

It does if you want to compare the winner of the tournament with a player who did not have the chance to play there.
Maru and Serral are probably top 5.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:31:40
October 23 2017 18:31 GMT
#73
On October 24 2017 03:28 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 03:23 Olli wrote:
GSL vs the World being an invitational doesn't invalidate the play that happened there.

It does if you want to compare the winner of the tournament with a player who did not have the chance to play there.

Rogue not having the chance to play there simply means that we treat the tournament as a net zero for him. For Inno it was a net positive, because he won the tournament. For sOs it was a net negative because he lost to Neeb. And so on and so forth.

That is one valid way to treat GSL vs the World. There are others.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Musicus
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany23576 Posts
October 23 2017 18:37 GMT
#74
On October 24 2017 03:31 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 03:28 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 03:23 Olli wrote:
GSL vs the World being an invitational doesn't invalidate the play that happened there.

It does if you want to compare the winner of the tournament with a player who did not have the chance to play there.

Rogue not having the chance to play there simply means that we treat the tournament as a net zero for him. For Inno it was a net positive, because he won the tournament. For sOs it was a net negative because he lost to Neeb. And so on and so forth.

That is one valid way to treat GSL vs the World. There are others.

Okay sure, then let's do a Rogue showmatch series and never invite Inno to it and count them too.

Anyway, I was just stating my opinion and what would render this PR irrelevant to me. You or the writers don't have to agree and the articles are still great regardless of the ranking.
Maru and Serral are probably top 5.
franzji
Profile Joined September 2013
United States583 Posts
October 23 2017 18:39 GMT
#75
I don't get how tournament wins are valued so much higher than getting far in the tournament also. Rogue managed to get past ro8 only twice this whole year I think. meanwhile stats did it 7 times this year if you count Gyeonggi, that's 7 semi-finals or finals.

though you could mention that rogue could not even play in gsl vs. the world only 2 months ago because he didn't even have enough wcs points, lol.

consistency > two recent tournament wins in any betting or rating.
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 18:49:07
October 23 2017 18:47 GMT
#76
On October 24 2017 02:50 Rolltide wrote:
Show nested quote +
Mvp and Zest were both better in 2011 and 2014 respectively. INnoVation was better this year too.

And nobody's arguing that Stats is horribly out of form. Just that Rogue's recent form is a bit better.

You continue to exaggerate massively.


How was Zest better in 2014? You are making that up. Zest won a GSL and a Kespa. How does that trump a GSL and an SSL? He finished third in points behind Bomber and Hyun with 5800. Stats has over 12000. Innovation had an absolutely monster year and Stats still has more than 2000 points.

FYI you gain points by playing well. This is not a figment of somebody's imagination. This is not an opinion of how he played. You EARN points by finishing high in significant tournaments.

Stats finished in the top 4 in 6 major tournaments. 6! He won 2 of them and finished 2nd in 2 of them. That is sick! 4 of those tournaments occurred after March.


Out of the 7 major korean tourmanents in 2014 (GSL 1/2/3, GSL world cup, kespa cup, hot6 cup, and proleague) Zest won 4, got 2 ro4s and one ro8. His 2014, MVPs 2011, and Inno's 2017 are hands down the best runs of all time. Stats isn't far behind though

And WCS points are a usless comparison. The point distribution is completely different now, and Stats had more tournaments that he competed in due to proleague being a big focus back in 2014. Zest was still the number 1 ranked WCS korea player in 2014, so in that sense they're still even
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 19:02:39
October 23 2017 18:58 GMT
#77
On October 24 2017 03:37 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 03:31 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 03:28 Musicus wrote:
On October 24 2017 03:23 Olli wrote:
GSL vs the World being an invitational doesn't invalidate the play that happened there.

It does if you want to compare the winner of the tournament with a player who did not have the chance to play there.

Rogue not having the chance to play there simply means that we treat the tournament as a net zero for him. For Inno it was a net positive, because he won the tournament. For sOs it was a net negative because he lost to Neeb. And so on and so forth.

That is one valid way to treat GSL vs the World. There are others.

Okay sure, then let's do a Rogue showmatch series and never invite Inno to it and count them too.

Anyway, I was just stating my opinion and what would render this PR irrelevant to me. You or the writers don't have to agree and the articles are still great regardless of the ranking.

If Rogue had a showmatch series, I would have no problem counting it. Such a series would be information about Rogue's current form. There's no need to discard information simply because it is not exhaustive and doesn't inform us about Inno's current form.

I'm glad you can draw the distinction between appreciation and agreement though. That's a rare talent around here.

On October 24 2017 03:39 youngjiddle wrote:
I don't get how tournament wins are valued so much higher than getting far in the tournament also. Rogue managed to get past ro8 only twice this whole year I think. meanwhile stats did it 7 times this year if you count Gyeonggi, that's 7 semi-finals or finals.

though you could mention that rogue could not even play in gsl vs. the world only 2 months ago because he didn't even have enough wcs points, lol.

consistency > two recent tournament wins in any betting or rating.

You don't get it because you overlooked the multiple reiterations of how a PR measures current form. Allow me to repeat: PRs measure current form.

Consistency across 2017 is irrelevant. Immaterial. Outside the scope of this article, and all 16 articles in this Road to Blizzcon series. You are complaining that your speedometer does not tell you the color of your car.

2016 IEM results have no bearing whatsoever on a 2017 Blizzcon PR
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 19:05 GMT
#78
Olli when you make a rational argument I'll be glad to agree with it. Saying that rankings are based on recent form is as superficial and lame as one can get. I'm not the only one who thinks Stats should be ranked higher than Rogue so I guess many of us are illogical and stupid and bull headed eh.

If you can't engage in a vigorous debate then just admit it and walk away. I made points that destroyed your argument(Stats beat Rogue!!!!!) so to get back at me you give me a warning. You are just being a vindictive ass.



Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 19:14 GMT
#79
And WCS points are a usless comparison. The point distribution is completely different now, and Stats had more tournaments that he competed in due to proleague being a big focus back in 2014. Zest was still the number 1 ranked WCS korea player in 2014, so in that sense they're still even


The issue with WCS points is that Stats has by far the most of any player this year.

Putting Rogue ahead of Stats would be like putting SoO ahead of Zest in 2014. SoO was in better form in late October.
DSK
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
England1110 Posts
October 23 2017 19:15 GMT
#80
My favourite to win. Cheering for you, Stats!.
**@ YT: SC2POVs at https://www.youtube.com/c/SC2POVsTV | https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/SC2POVs @**
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 19:23 GMT
#81


Watch the vod and draw whatever conclusions you choose.
Gurbak
Profile Joined January 2017
France622 Posts
October 23 2017 19:39 GMT
#82
On October 24 2017 04:23 Rolltide wrote:
https://youtu.be/qs7lM66Za0g?t=25

Watch the vod and draw whatever conclusions you choose.

Rogue won the supertournament. Stats lost in ro16. The conclusion is obvious.
Pandain
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States12989 Posts
October 23 2017 19:45 GMT
#83
Wait it was a 3-2? How can you use a close series as your primal argument that one player is unquestionably better than the other as a whole. Even disregarding how close it was, if we used head to head as our metric, we might as well disregard this ranking and use the unofficial world champion one.


What I'll say is that you can definitely make arguments that stats should be higher ranked, maybe even as high as 1 depending on the metric. But I'm sure you agree there are strong arguments the other way around, such as just looking at the strength of rogues play in the last major tournament. And it's a bigger question than head to head, it's "who is an overall scarier player to play against". Rogue looked craaaaazy good against the absolute best players in a high stakes tournament where his blizzcon chances were on the line.


And I'm , for better or worse, ignoring most results between super tournament and blizzcon. They are unquestionably suspect in their validity since people are preparing their real and final builds for blizzcon.
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
October 23 2017 19:56 GMT
#84
On October 24 2017 04:05 Rolltide wrote:
Olli when you make a rational argument I'll be glad to agree with it. Saying that rankings are based on recent form is as superficial and lame as one can get. I'm not the only one who thinks Stats should be ranked higher than Rogue so I guess many of us are illogical and stupid and bull headed eh.

If you can't engage in a vigorous debate then just admit it and walk away. I made points that destroyed your argument(Stats beat Rogue!!!!!) so to get back at me you give me a warning. You are just being a vindictive ass.





KBB warned you for triple posting, which we've all told you a hundred times not to do.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
October 23 2017 20:02 GMT
#85
On October 24 2017 04:56 Olli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 04:05 Rolltide wrote:
Olli when you make a rational argument I'll be glad to agree with it. Saying that rankings are based on recent form is as superficial and lame as one can get. I'm not the only one who thinks Stats should be ranked higher than Rogue so I guess many of us are illogical and stupid and bull headed eh.

If you can't engage in a vigorous debate then just admit it and walk away. I made points that destroyed your argument(Stats beat Rogue!!!!!) so to get back at me you give me a warning. You are just being a vindictive ass.





KBB warned you for triple posting, which we've all told you a hundred times not to do.

Definition of insanity?
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
FXOTheoRy
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States519 Posts
October 23 2017 20:45 GMT
#86
These have been entertaining reads! No reason to get worked up over for fun rankings everyone, we all have our own opinions Rooting for Stats to win the whole thing, strongest player of 2017 in my book!
oyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoy
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 20:51 GMT
#87
KBB warned you for triple posting, which we've all told you a hundred times not to do.


Now look who is exaggerating.

SetGuitarsToKill
Profile Blog Joined December 2013
Canada28396 Posts
October 23 2017 20:53 GMT
#88
On October 24 2017 05:51 Rolltide wrote:
Show nested quote +
KBB warned you for triple posting, which we've all told you a hundred times not to do.


Now look who is exaggerating.


It's not that big of an exaggeration.
Community News"As long as you have a warp prism you can't be bad at harassment" - Maru | @SetGuitars2Kill
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 23 2017 21:00 GMT
#89
Wait it was a 3-2? How can you use a close series as your primal argument that one player is unquestionably better than the other as a whole. Even disregarding how close it was, if we used head to head as our metric, we might as well disregard this ranking and use the unofficial world champion one.


Had Rogue won that match I guarantee you people would be using that as an argument for why he should be ranked ahead of Stats.

p1cass0
Profile Joined May 2016
46 Posts
October 23 2017 21:26 GMT
#90
To be honest, the reason Rogue being so hype right now is mostly his STORY about the last-minute-victory to Blizzcon. No one considered him as one of the best before ST2. His ST2 run was impressive but not dominant. Those wins against INno and herO were very clutch. And he performed after ST2 just like an average korean. Don't forget the fact that zerg was pretty favoured in the last two months. Talking about recent form, herO is the real beast.
Twinkle Toes
Profile Joined May 2012
United States3605 Posts
October 23 2017 22:48 GMT
#91
On October 24 2017 06:26 p1cass0 wrote:
To be honest, the reason Rogue being so hype right now is mostly his STORY about the last-minute-victory to Blizzcon. No one considered him as one of the best before ST2. His ST2 run was impressive but not dominant. Those wins against INno and herO were very clutch. And he performed after ST2 just like an average korean. Don't forget the fact that zerg was pretty favoured in the last two months. Talking about recent form, herO is the real beast.

And his beast-mode late game ZvT!
Bisu - INnoVation - Dark - Rogue - Stats
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
October 23 2017 22:50 GMT
#92
On October 24 2017 06:26 p1cass0 wrote:
To be honest, the reason Rogue being so hype right now is mostly his STORY about the last-minute-victory to Blizzcon. No one considered him as one of the best before ST2. His ST2 run was impressive but not dominant. Those wins against INno and herO were very clutch. And he performed after ST2 just like an average korean. Don't forget the fact that zerg was pretty favoured in the last two months. Talking about recent form, herO is the real beast.

I considered him to be one of the best before ST2.

His recent performances in premier tournaments:
IEM Shanghai- Win
GSL- Lost 2-3 in the Ro8
SSL Challenge- 4th though he played like he didn't care. (not surprising that he focused on other tournaments that granted him 2017 WCS points rather than potential points if he gets to premier in 2018)

Had he played in GSL vs The World, I'd have ranked him as #1 and Innovation as #2 going in since it was right after IEM Shanghai.

That was at least in the discussion of top form over the last few months.
Zaros
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United Kingdom3692 Posts
October 23 2017 22:55 GMT
#93
In current offline form Rogue is simply better than stats, he has won 2 of the last 4 recent offline tournaments beating hero, innovation, dark. He might have lost recent head to head vs stats but this is a power ranking head to heads can't be taken as the only relevant thing.

As for recent online results I don't think anyone who is qualified for blizzcon is playing their best at the moment probably more important to keep your powder dry.
Snarosc
Profile Joined January 2016
France66 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-23 23:16:00
October 23 2017 23:03 GMT
#94
I can already see Innovation being #1 just for the sake of Innovation being Innovation.
This terran fanboyism is becoming ridiculous at this point.

Just looking at Inno's last 10 matches : 5W - 5L

2 Loss against Stats
1 Loss against herO
1 Loss against aLive
1 Loss against TY

5 wins against :

Solar
Trap
Creator
aLive
Bunny.

Losing against the Top, winning against the mids.

WOW... The definition of peaking... GOAT.
Stats is the best player of LotV.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
October 23 2017 23:47 GMT
#95
On October 24 2017 08:03 Snarosc wrote:
I can already see Innovation being #1 just for the sake of Innovation being Innovation.
This terran fanboyism is becoming ridiculous at this point.

Just looking at Inno's last 10 matches : 5W - 5L

2 Loss against Stats
1 Loss against herO
1 Loss against aLive
1 Loss against TY

5 wins against :

Solar
Trap
Creator
aLive
Bunny.

Losing against the Top, winning against the mids.

WOW... The definition of peaking... GOAT.

..............

1. This Blizzcon PR, like every other PR, measures current form. Therefore, it completely disregards any results older than a few months.
2. GOAT is a title awarded to the player with the most achievements across their career lifetime. Therefore, it completely disregards current form.
3. Every single one of the 10 matches you cited was played online, during the time immediately preceding Blizzcon. Online tourneys are an unreliable indicator of form in the best of times, and right before Blizzcon is about as far from that as could possibly be.

Welding three different measures of three separate things into the most poorly-supported attack on the alleged bias of TL writers I have ever had the misfortune to read.........truly, I am impressed. It takes real work to craft an argument so utterly wrong in every aspect imaginable.

Oh, and the accusation of "Terran fanboyism" took the cake. That level of hypocritical irony is usually reserved for Alex Jones and his ilk.

Thank you. Mondays can always use a good long laugh.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Snarosc
Profile Joined January 2016
France66 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-24 01:51:31
October 24 2017 01:47 GMT
#96
On October 24 2017 08:47 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 08:03 Snarosc wrote:
I can already see Innovation being #1 just for the sake of Innovation being Innovation.
This terran fanboyism is becoming ridiculous at this point.

Just looking at Inno's last 10 matches : 5W - 5L

2 Loss against Stats
1 Loss against herO
1 Loss against aLive
1 Loss against TY

5 wins against :

Solar
Trap
Creator
aLive
Bunny.

Losing against the Top, winning against the mids.

WOW... The definition of peaking... GOAT.

..............

1. This Blizzcon PR, like every other PR, measures current form. Therefore, it completely disregards any results older than a few months.
2. GOAT is a title awarded to the player with the most achievements across their career lifetime. Therefore, it completely disregards current form.
3. Every single one of the 10 matches you cited was played online, during the time immediately preceding Blizzcon. Online tourneys are an unreliable indicator of form in the best of times, and right before Blizzcon is about as far from that as could possibly be.

Welding three different measures of three separate things into the most poorly-supported attack on the alleged bias of TL writers I have ever had the misfortune to read.........truly, I am impressed. It takes real work to craft an argument so utterly wrong in every aspect imaginable.

Oh, and the accusation of "Terran fanboyism" took the cake. That level of hypocritical irony is usually reserved for Alex Jones and his ilk.

Thank you. Mondays can always use a good long laugh.


1) Funny, what a familiar sound, again tickling my ears : "online results don't matter".... when it serves your point.
Just one little problem on this one : we're just a few days before Blizzcon, 3 days actually, aaaand the last offline tournament was about a month ago (No no, ok ... I admit it.. ST2 was only 23 days ago).
Best indicator to measure "current form" right ? We all know nothing changes in a month of SC2.

But anyway, let's forget about online results for a second, as you wish :

Stats won Starleague.. Literally a month ago, dominating the tournament from start to finish.
When at the same time Innovation ended up 5th, not even in the playoffs, and Rogue, well... he barely made it out of Challenge with a 2-3 score in 4th place. Man, to qualify being 4th in a 6 people group, felt like watching Portugal playing Football right there.

Anyway, a week before that, Innovation won GSL... Finishing 2nd in Ro16 group stage, Winning 3-2 in Ro8 and 4-3 in semis as well as in Finals, ending up as one, if not the least dominant GSL champion of any season we've ever had. (Oh btw Stats only finished 3rd/4th of that very same tournament)

Now, the last tournament, ST2, happened one week after SSL, and saw Rogue taking the tournament in his first result in over 3 months time (basically off the radar before that).


... I mean, looking at these results, What a fool am I to even argue that Stats shouldn't be below Rogue & Innovation.

But hey, I just forgot who I was talking to :

"Lmao at all the raging Stats fanboys. Blizzcon starts in a few days and your favorite player can demonstrate exactly where he belongs in the PR.
PRs measure current form, and Stats peaked around March."

"Ayyyy go for it.
I want to feast on Stats-fanboy salt and tears."


.. Is .. Is that you just... hours ago on this very same thread ? Oh man, "Mondays can always use a good long laugh". Indeed.
Stats is the best player of LotV.
Boggyb
Profile Joined January 2017
2855 Posts
October 24 2017 02:02 GMT
#97
On October 24 2017 10:47 Snarosc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 08:47 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 08:03 Snarosc wrote:
I can already see Innovation being #1 just for the sake of Innovation being Innovation.
This terran fanboyism is becoming ridiculous at this point.

Just looking at Inno's last 10 matches : 5W - 5L

2 Loss against Stats
1 Loss against herO
1 Loss against aLive
1 Loss against TY

5 wins against :

Solar
Trap
Creator
aLive
Bunny.

Losing against the Top, winning against the mids.

WOW... The definition of peaking... GOAT.

..............

1. This Blizzcon PR, like every other PR, measures current form. Therefore, it completely disregards any results older than a few months.
2. GOAT is a title awarded to the player with the most achievements across their career lifetime. Therefore, it completely disregards current form.
3. Every single one of the 10 matches you cited was played online, during the time immediately preceding Blizzcon. Online tourneys are an unreliable indicator of form in the best of times, and right before Blizzcon is about as far from that as could possibly be.

Welding three different measures of three separate things into the most poorly-supported attack on the alleged bias of TL writers I have ever had the misfortune to read.........truly, I am impressed. It takes real work to craft an argument so utterly wrong in every aspect imaginable.

Oh, and the accusation of "Terran fanboyism" took the cake. That level of hypocritical irony is usually reserved for Alex Jones and his ilk.

Thank you. Mondays can always use a good long laugh.


1) Funny, what a familiar sound, again tickling my ears : "online results don't matter".... when it serves your point.
Just one little problem on this one : we're just a few days before Blizzcon, 3 days actually, aaaand the last offline tournament was about a month ago (No no, ok ... I admit it.. ST2 was only 23 days ago).
Best indicator to measure "current form" right ? We all know nothing changes in a month of SC2.

But anyway, let's forget about online results for a second, as you wish :

Stats won Starleague.. Literally a month ago, dominating the tournament from start to finish.
When at the same time Innovation ended up 5th, not even in the playoffs, and Rogue, well... he barely made it out of Challenge with a 2-3 score in 4th place. Man, to qualify being 4th in a 6 people group, felt like watching Portugal playing Football right there.

Anyway, a week before that, Innovation won GSL... Finishing 2nd in Ro16 group stage, Winning 3-2 in Ro8 and 4-3 in semis as well as in Finals, ending up as one, if not the least dominant GSL champion of any season we've ever had. (Oh btw Stats only finished 3rd/4th of that very same tournament)

Now, the last tournament, ST2, happened one week after SSL, and saw Rogue taking the tournament in his first result in over 3 months time (basically off the radar before that).


... I mean, looking at these results, What a fool am I to even argue that Stats shouldn't be below Rogue & Innovation.

But hey, I just forgot who I was talking to :

"Lmao at all the raging Stats fanboys. Blizzcon starts in a few days and your favorite player can demonstrate exactly where he belongs in the PR.
PRs measure current form, and Stats peaked around March."

"Ayyyy go for it.
I want to feast on Stats-fanboy salt and tears."


.. Is .. Is that you just... hours ago on this very same thread ? Oh man, "Mondays can always use a good long laugh". Indeed.

Stats won the SSL finals 4-3. That's not dominating.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-24 03:04:48
October 24 2017 02:25 GMT
#98
On October 24 2017 10:47 Snarosc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 08:47 pvsnp wrote:
On October 24 2017 08:03 Snarosc wrote:
I can already see Innovation being #1 just for the sake of Innovation being Innovation.
This terran fanboyism is becoming ridiculous at this point.

Just looking at Inno's last 10 matches : 5W - 5L

2 Loss against Stats
1 Loss against herO
1 Loss against aLive
1 Loss against TY

5 wins against :

Solar
Trap
Creator
aLive
Bunny.

Losing against the Top, winning against the mids.

WOW... The definition of peaking... GOAT.

..............

1. This Blizzcon PR, like every other PR, measures current form. Therefore, it completely disregards any results older than a few months.
2. GOAT is a title awarded to the player with the most achievements across their career lifetime. Therefore, it completely disregards current form.
3. Every single one of the 10 matches you cited was played online, during the time immediately preceding Blizzcon. Online tourneys are an unreliable indicator of form in the best of times, and right before Blizzcon is about as far from that as could possibly be.

Welding three different measures of three separate things into the most poorly-supported attack on the alleged bias of TL writers I have ever had the misfortune to read.........truly, I am impressed. It takes real work to craft an argument so utterly wrong in every aspect imaginable.

Oh, and the accusation of "Terran fanboyism" took the cake. That level of hypocritical irony is usually reserved for Alex Jones and his ilk.

Thank you. Mondays can always use a good long laugh.


1) Funny, what a familiar sound, again tickling my ears : "online results don't matter".... when it serves your point.
Just one little problem on this one : we're just a few days before Blizzcon, 3 days actually, aaaand the last offline tournament was about a month ago (No no, ok ... I admit it.. ST2 was only 23 days ago).
Best indicator to measure "current form" right ? We all know nothing changes in a month of SC2.

But anyway, let's forget about online results for a second, as you wish :

Stats won Starleague.. Literally a month ago, dominating the tournament from start to finish.
When at the same time Innovation ended up 5th, not even in the playoffs, and Rogue, well... he barely made it out of Challenge with a 2-3 score in 4th place. Man, to qualify being 4th in a 6 people group, felt like watching Portugal playing Football right there.

Anyway, a week before that, Innovation won GSL... Finishing 2nd in Ro16 group stage, Winning 3-2 in Ro8 and 4-3 in semis as well as in Finals, ending up as one, if not the least dominant GSL champion of any season we've ever had. (Oh btw Stats only finished 3rd/4th of that very same tournament)

Now, the last tournament, ST2, happened one week after SSL, and saw Rogue taking the tournament in his first result in over 3 months time (basically off the radar before that).


... I mean, looking at these results, What a fool am I to even argue that Stats shouldn't be below Rogue & Innovation.

But hey, I just forgot who I was talking to :

"Lmao at all the raging Stats fanboys. Blizzcon starts in a few days and your favorite player can demonstrate exactly where he belongs in the PR.
PRs measure current form, and Stats peaked around March."

"Ayyyy go for it.
I want to feast on Stats-fanboy salt and tears."


.. Is .. Is that you just... hours ago on this very same thread ? Oh man, "Mondays can always use a good long laugh". Indeed.

First of all, thanks for addressing all my points. Your comprehensive reply about conflating current form with lifetime achievement was most enlightening.....oh wait. Well, I guess I shouldn't have expected anything more from you.

Now to address your own "points:"

1. "Funny, what a familiar sound, again tickling my ears : "online results don't matter".... when it serves your point."

Online results do matter. They just matter less than offline ones. In every scenario. That's my stance, and has always been my stance. Just because you like to use self-serving results doesn't mean everyone else stoops to the same lows. Go on, show me a single post where I ever claimed that online results matter more than offline. I'll wait. And laugh.

2. "Best indicator to measure "current form" right ? We all know nothing changes in a month of SC2."

Certainly form can and does change in a month. We just don't have any way of reliably measuring that change right now. That's what Blizzcon is for, yknow the big offline tournament coming in a few days. You may have heard of it. In the meantime, we have to predict with what offline results we have, suboptimal though they may be. Imagine that, using big offline tournament results to predict a big offline tournament. Revolutionary, I know.

3. Some listing of offline results that appears to be accurate, though presented in a blatantly biased manner. Not that I'd expect any better from you.

4. "... I mean, looking at these results, What a fool am I to even argue that Stats shouldn't be below Rogue & Innovation."

Nice shifting the goalposts. If you can't win the argument, just change the subject! It works for Donald Trump, right? Your original post made a grand total of 0 mentions of Rogue. It mentioned Stats only in the context of Inno's online matches, nothing to do with Stats's ranking in this PR. It focused completely on Inno, and why Inno somehow would only be #1 due to "Terran fanboyism," citing some recent online results as evidence for slumping. Anytime you want to address the original discussion is fine. Knowing you, I won't hold my breath.

At least you are honest about admitting that you are a fool, though. I appreciate that.

4. "But hey, I just forgot who I was talking to :"

Somebody who isn't as moronically biased as you? Yeah, I suppose you did forget that.

5. ".. Is .. Is that you just... hours ago on this very same thread ? Oh man, "Mondays can always use a good long laugh". Indeed."

Actually, Stats is one of my favorite players. I'm a huge fan of his Rain-esque defensive macro style. Unlike you, I don't allow that favoritism of the player, or his race, to bleed over into assessing how well he is actually playing. It's called rationality, you might want to try it sometime.


All in all, I have to say that you continue to impress. It's been so long since I encountered such a sorry excuse for a post here on TL. I daresay your post would fit right in with Bnet rantings. Or even, just maybe, Twitch chat?

Do please try again, it's so very entertaining to read what you have to say. Though, I've seen more than enough of your Twitch chat ravings about how everything and everyone under the sun is somehow conspiring against Protoss to know how this ends. I know it must be terribly difficult to construct an argument longer than a sentence fragment, and without even any emotes no less. But please, continue.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Kaizor
Profile Joined May 2015
Singapore909 Posts
October 24 2017 03:49 GMT
#99
It wouldn't be a tl power ranking without controversy.

And if my memory is correct, last years blizzcon pr was even worse. So this one is a slight improvement.
Hit me up if you need chinese translations. soO fighting !!
Phredxor
Profile Joined May 2013
New Zealand15076 Posts
October 24 2017 04:30 GMT
#100
What a swell thread.

I'd probably have Stats at #2 myself but i think the top 3 are more or less interchangeable.
zealotstim
Profile Joined February 2015
United States455 Posts
October 24 2017 05:25 GMT
#101
Wow stats has a much lower win rate than I expected. Probably due to his usual opponents being others on this list.
FrkFrJss
Profile Joined April 2015
Canada1205 Posts
October 24 2017 05:34 GMT
#102
On October 24 2017 13:30 Phredxor wrote:
What a swell thread.

I'd probably have Stats at #2 myself but i think the top 3 are more or less interchangeable.


I'd say that even with herO and Dark not having the same results in a similar time period, I think 1-2 could be any of Stats, Rogue, or INnoVation, and 3-5 could be any of herO and Dark and the previously mentioned trio. Of course, Dark definitely looks less scary after his loss in ST2, but with his close losses to both Stats and INnoVation, he's up there in the top 5.

Even though the Master's Coliseum was an online tournament, it was still worth 10K. But when combined with his results in ST2, herO beat Dark, INnoVation, Rogue, and soO in a tournament within the last three weeks. The Master's Coliseum was online, but a 10K prizepool is nothing to dismiss so easily. It's not like the Ting Open 4, where Neeb offraced against Scarlett in the winner's finals.

I think the top Koreans are incredibly close with TY and soO within shouting distance and GuMiho calling from a block or two away.

"Keep Moving Forward" - Walt Disney
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
October 24 2017 05:59 GMT
#103
On October 24 2017 14:34 FrkFrJss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 13:30 Phredxor wrote:
What a swell thread.

I'd probably have Stats at #2 myself but i think the top 3 are more or less interchangeable.


I'd say that even with herO and Dark not having the same results in a similar time period, I think 1-2 could be any of Stats, Rogue, or INnoVation, and 3-5 could be any of herO and Dark and the previously mentioned trio. Of course, Dark definitely looks less scary after his loss in ST2, but with his close losses to both Stats and INnoVation, he's up there in the top 5.

Even though the Master's Coliseum was an online tournament, it was still worth 10K. But when combined with his results in ST2, herO beat Dark, INnoVation, Rogue, and soO in a tournament within the last three weeks. The Master's Coliseum was online, but a 10K prizepool is nothing to dismiss so easily. It's not like the Ting Open 4, where Neeb offraced against Scarlett in the winner's finals.

I think the top Koreans are incredibly close with TY and soO within shouting distance and GuMiho calling from a block or two away.

Gumiho used to just shout louder, until that upjumped nouveau riche kid Neeb bought up the empty lot and built a new house there.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
lptuser
Profile Joined October 2017
5 Posts
October 24 2017 09:13 GMT
#104
I think the joke is not that powerrank should be based on current form(should be big part of it) but that stats’ current form is gauged based on his ST2 and master of coliseum’s results.

Name me one reason that stats would use his real strategy and build in those two tournaments. He didn’t need the points. Not starleague titles to win and the prize combined wouldnt beat winning one round at blizzcon, so why risk leaking real builds for opponents to study. It was in his best interest to play standard or fake builds and gave out as little information as possible. If you watched his ST2 game, you know what I mean. OTOH, players like hero is known to perform well at this kind of low stake tournaments(stakes are high for rogue though in ST2) By the same token, Rogue’s result in master’s coliseum should weigh very little in powerrank. Same goes for innovation (he had reserve in losing to Rogue and was almost intentionally not defending oracles in his TVP in master of coliseum). For Rogue, all that we knew was he was giving it all in ST2, and GSL S3, since he needed every point he could get.

The most recent data points you should use for players like Stats and inno are GSL s3 and SSL s2 because they compete for starleague championships(prestige and legacy) and are saving it for blizzcon(high prize pool and big stage). So to me, rogue’s current form while impressive(winning a tournament where exactly 4 players really cared so much about), is less so than Stats and Inno. Let alone the overall result. It is easy to say Stats is just a consistent good player. LOL, the guy peaked all year and had the luxury to cruise in small stages. Rogue/Dark for #3/4 is a toss up for me. I view Dark’s loss vs all-out Inno in GSL more impressive(Dark dictated the games) than Rogue winning vs a lousy Inno who was experimenting builds(again if you look at actual game content you know what I mean here) in ST2.
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-24 09:15:05
October 24 2017 09:14 GMT
#105
The GSL match between Stats and Rogue is worth watching just as a Starcraft fan. It is epic!

I think it is retarded to discount a match just because it was close. The money difference between 1st and 2nd place in Anaheim is $140,000! Close does not mean shit it is who wins! Who wants to lose Premier league by one goal or the super bowl by a point or the world series by a run? You still lost!

I'm not a Stats fan boy as one poster calls some of us. I'm certainly not anti Rogue. What you have in that match is a cool collected player in Stats vs a player who thought that losing would be the end of his Blizzcon chances. Rogue was emotional in that match.

Now Rogue does have a history of playing well at Blizzcon. He made the semi finals in 2015. He beat Maru 3-0 and then beat Hydra 3-2 before getting spanked by sOs 3-0 in the semi final.
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
October 24 2017 09:16 GMT
#106
Well said Iptuser. I agree with your entire post.

lptuser
Profile Joined October 2017
5 Posts
October 24 2017 10:07 GMT
#107
On October 24 2017 04:45 Pandain wrote:
Rogue looked craaaaazy good against the absolute best players in a high stakes tournament where his blizzcon chances were on the line.


Rogue played well in ST2 no doubt about it. High stake tournaments? No. Where his blizzcon chances were on the line? Ok maybe stake were high for him, sos, maru and classic. The list ends there, sorry aLive. Rewatch the games without listening to casters’ hypes (“best day in sc2’s history” on ST2’s last day by tastosis, are you kidding me?). I saw Rogue played really well against an Inno who was experimenting and hiding builds (look at how different his builds were in GSL semi/finals when he wa taking his opponents seriously).

He also looked good vs hero who usually peaks in a $10k tournament so I will give you that.

On October 24 2017 04:45 Pandain wrote:
And I'm , for better or worse, ignoring most results between super tournament and blizzcon. They are unquestionably suspect in their validity since people are preparing their real and final builds for blizzcon.


What made you so convinced in the validity of results by players not named Rogue, sOs, Classic, and Maru in ST2?
Zaros
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United Kingdom3692 Posts
October 24 2017 10:10 GMT
#108
On October 24 2017 19:07 lptuser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 04:45 Pandain wrote:
Rogue looked craaaaazy good against the absolute best players in a high stakes tournament where his blizzcon chances were on the line.


Rogue played well in ST2 no doubt about it. High stake tournaments? No. Where his blizzcon chances were on the line? Ok maybe stake were high for him, sos, maru and classic. The list ends there, sorry aLive. Rewatch the games without listening to casters’ hypes (“best day in sc2’s history” on ST2’s last day by tastosis, are you kidding me?). I saw Rogue played really well against an Inno who was experimenting and hiding builds (look at how different his builds were in GSL semi/finals when he wa taking his opponents seriously).

He also looked good vs hero who usually peaks in a $10k tournament so I will give you that.

Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 04:45 Pandain wrote:
And I'm , for better or worse, ignoring most results between super tournament and blizzcon. They are unquestionably suspect in their validity since people are preparing their real and final builds for blizzcon.


What made you so convinced in the validity of results by players not named Rogue, sOs, Classic, and Maru in ST2?


seems like you are making excuses, no one would give up a chance of victory in a GSL even a super tournament just to hide builds for a tournament 1 month away.
lptuser
Profile Joined October 2017
5 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-24 10:32:45
October 24 2017 10:26 GMT
#109
On October 24 2017 19:10 Zaros wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2017 19:07 lptuser wrote:
On October 24 2017 04:45 Pandain wrote:
Rogue looked craaaaazy good against the absolute best players in a high stakes tournament where his blizzcon chances were on the line.


Rogue played well in ST2 no doubt about it. High stake tournaments? No. Where his blizzcon chances were on the line? Ok maybe stake were high for him, sos, maru and classic. The list ends there, sorry aLive. Rewatch the games without listening to casters’ hypes (“best day in sc2’s history” on ST2’s last day by tastosis, are you kidding me?). I saw Rogue played really well against an Inno who was experimenting and hiding builds (look at how different his builds were in GSL semi/finals when he wa taking his opponents seriously).

He also looked good vs hero who usually peaks in a $10k tournament so I will give you that.

On October 24 2017 04:45 Pandain wrote:
And I'm , for better or worse, ignoring most results between super tournament and blizzcon. They are unquestionably suspect in their validity since people are preparing their real and final builds for blizzcon.


What made you so convinced in the validity of results by players not named Rogue, sOs, Classic, and Maru in ST2?


seems like you are making excuses, no one would give up a chance of victory in a GSL even a super tournament just to hide builds for a tournament 1 month away.


Seems like you dismiss points as excuses. I know it’s called GSL super tournament but its similarity to GSL ends there. Who would give up a chance of victory in ST2 just for blizzcon? Reread this sentence and tell me you are serious.

But I didn’t answer that question. Stats did and so did Inno. To be fair Rogue played really well that I’n not saying if Stats or Inno played to their full strength they would have won. But it’s clear from actual games that they were experimenting builds. They were executing those builds very seriously, since ST2 was a great practice opportunity for them. But still, I guarantee you they won’t use those builds in Blizzcon(nor did they in GSL S3 vs equal opponents)

Again in Korea, STs are at best on the level of Kespa cups: not nearly as prestigious as starleagues. Hence winning it felt like a consolation for Soo. When it was the last offline tournament before the real deal, its validity as measure of players’ real strength should be taken with a grain of salt to say the least (again not so much for the mentioned 4 players)

Edit: Did I mention players like herO peaks at $10k tournaments and other guys turn it up on big stages? Hint: the reason is not that herO is ‘unlucky’ in his peak timings. Top dogs simply aren’t 100% serious sometimes.
Phredxor
Profile Joined May 2013
New Zealand15076 Posts
October 24 2017 10:51 GMT
#110
Stats clearly been hiding builds ever since he qualified in March anyway. Nobody stands a chance.
lptuser
Profile Joined October 2017
5 Posts
October 24 2017 10:55 GMT
#111
Not saying Rogue isn’t a monster by any means. But the only useful data points for Stats is saying he’s having the best form one could hope for (ok maybe dual star league champs is, but no one ever did that in one season.)

If you take 80% current form and 20% overall achievement Stats still wins by having one of best results any player had in any year and arguably the same recent form. If not, Rogue might as well be rank 1 since the same argument would fail harder for ranking inno above him.

My rant ends with this post. Been lurking on TL for years but this pr is just too ridiculous so I registered to post. Stats gets too little credit for doing so much(being the professor on a team with TY and being ace on a team with zest, somehow still giving westerners the impression that he’s just a hardworking great player, best individual yearly result in history and gets ranked #3 due to not performing as well in tournaments like ST..). Sorry for my bad english. I understand sometimes the ranking like this needs elements of surprise and if that’s the case I fell for it but I had to.
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
October 24 2017 11:12 GMT
#112
This is not the best individual year a player has had. And WCS points are a horrible way to measure that.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
Sakat
Profile Blog Joined October 2014
Croatia1599 Posts
October 24 2017 11:51 GMT
#113
Rogue is probably the best Zerg atm and is in insane form. Reminds me a lot of Soulkey back in 2013 or a 2014 soO, that type of insane Zerg that doesn't let you leave your corner of the map. But I don't think that justifies his ranking above Stats because it is clear that both him and Inno are the two contenders for player of the year due to them being double Starleague champions with consistent form and great results across the board while Rogue just recently started turning heads.

I'd say it mostly comes down to what you value more. Something I would like to point out is that Rogue in relation to the aforementioned two has a clear weakness in his play (historically) and that is somewhat poor strategic decision-making and mentality in a long series, especially in a preparation based tournament. He has a tendancy to try overly risky builds too often per series and fall apart mentally. That is why he was such a monster in PL which is bo1, but never got past the ro8 in a Starleague setting.

I believe that given time to prepare both Stats and Inno would come out on top of Rogue 9/10 times. But since Blizzcon is not a prep based tournament, I would say that their chances are quite equal from the ro4 onwards, but should they meet earlier I would favour Stats/Inno.

The top three really is a toss-up in my eyes. I would prefer Rogue it #3 (due to the reason I just stated) and Stats at #2 but dependig on criteria it could easily be just as likely to have Rogue #1
My boy Ptak defeated two GSL champions!
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
October 24 2017 15:06 GMT
#114
This feels like the proper time to say I've been hiding my builds on the ladder and am ready for the next GSL qualifier.

Hurricane better tremble in fear.
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Wintex
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Norway16838 Posts
October 26 2017 16:24 GMT
#115
Sometimes I feel like the language in this article kind of was a bit jumpy? The text is cool, but the comma usage makes me a bit tired, as if you are rapidly switching between accelerating and pumping the brakes of a car.

Stats is gonna win tho. Let`s go.
The Bomber boy
highsis
Profile Joined August 2011
259 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-10-28 18:22:41
October 28 2017 18:22 GMT
#116
Today's showing does not even warrant top 15. When I see players playing so bad out of the blue I never figured out why that kind of thing happens.

Unlike other physical sports, progamers lose forms too quickly often without reasons. Hopefully it's the case of jetlag but I fear it isn't.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech99
BRAT_OK 75
ForJumy 40
Codebar 40
MindelVK 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 2109
Shuttle 1726
Larva 470
hero 453
firebathero 257
ggaemo 231
Soma 217
Rush 171
Mong 142
Sharp 60
[ Show more ]
sSak 58
Bonyth 51
Aegong 33
Backho 32
Terrorterran 23
Dota 2
Gorgc4276
Dendi1146
XcaliburYe92
Counter-Strike
fl0m3709
ScreaM978
Foxcn137
oskar128
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby1225
Liquid`Hasu260
Khaldor124
Other Games
crisheroes747
RotterdaM335
Beastyqt276
PiGStarcraft225
mouzStarbuck203
Fuzer 163
ViBE147
C9.Mang0140
TKL 140
Hui .119
ArmadaUGS98
KnowMe85
Trikslyr63
StateSC225
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta25
• iHatsuTV 7
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 15
• 80smullet 8
• Michael_bg 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Nemesis2473
• C_a_k_e 2093
• WagamamaTV341
League of Legends
• TFBlade900
Counter-Strike
• imaqtpie928
• Shiphtur201
Upcoming Events
BSL Team Wars
22m
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Online Event
16h 22m
SC Evo League
17h 22m
Online Event
18h 22m
OSC
18h 22m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
20h 22m
CSO Contender
22h 22m
[BSL 2025] Weekly
23h 22m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 15h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 16h
[ Show More ]
SC Evo League
1d 17h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 20h
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Dewalt vs Team Bonyth
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
2 days
RotterdaM Event
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Mini vs TBD
Soma vs sSak
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-08-13
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.