• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:58
CEST 01:58
KST 08:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202547RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 548 users

Blizzard's thoughts on Swarm Hosts - Page 35

Forum Index > SC2 General
1050 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 53 Next
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
May 08 2014 22:03 GMT
#681
I think the idea for this buff is to allow you to split your hydras in the midgame to defend your bases vs. mutas rather than relying on heavy spore defenses. I don't think it accomplishes that though: 10 hydras aren't going to beat 20 mutas now, they won't beat them after.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
May 08 2014 22:04 GMT
#682
On May 09 2014 07:03 Whitewing wrote:
I think the idea for this buff is to allow you to split your hydras in the midgame to defend your bases vs. mutas rather than relying on heavy spore defenses. I don't think it accomplishes that though: 10 hydras aren't going to beat 20 mutas now, they won't beat them after.


I thought the goal was to allow mutas to actually attack far off bases without getting stopped by a mere 3-4 spores.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
May 08 2014 22:13 GMT
#683
On May 09 2014 07:04 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 09 2014 07:03 Whitewing wrote:
I think the idea for this buff is to allow you to split your hydras in the midgame to defend your bases vs. mutas rather than relying on heavy spore defenses. I don't think it accomplishes that though: 10 hydras aren't going to beat 20 mutas now, they won't beat them after.


I thought the goal was to allow mutas to actually attack far off bases without getting stopped by a mere 3-4 spores.


It is, but they need to buff hydras to compensate or else ZvZ will be muta vs muta wars again, which is why spores were buffed in the first place.

The idea was also to fix swarmhost vs swarmhost by making it so mass spores didn't just instant-gib broodlords yanked into them, but this doesn't accomplish that either.

It's just not a good change.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
May 08 2014 22:17 GMT
#684
On May 09 2014 06:39 MonkeyKing_slk wrote:
I doubt about the change on hydra. Clearly for now muta cannot directly fight hydra. Muta use high mobility to attack things that are not protected by hydra, or eat small group of hydra. With this buff everything still remain the same.

Well, stuff like that will help hydraplay vs mass muta, yet I fear that opening ling/bling into muta is just going to stomp fast hydralisks in the economy game. The opening dynamics probably will dictate mutas, but when both players go mutas, we know what happens.
It all comes down to third bases. Also Im not sure at all if this helps stalemates... BLs are still too slow to escape from the spores after bein pulled. At best, there are going to be a little less SHs and a little extra hydras I guess. Assuming your opponent is looking like going broods.
iknowFiRE
Profile Joined January 2012
Slovenia37 Posts
May 09 2014 00:58 GMT
#685
well if dkim is willing to give hydra +bio dmg to their antiair, it only stands to reason they consider giving carriers and bcs +cloak/burrow dmg, would fix swarmhost and carriers/bc simultaneously, please!
BurningRanger
Profile Joined January 2012
Germany303 Posts
May 09 2014 09:16 GMT
#686
Blizzard's way to deal with this is rather strange.
They see a problem with the Swarmhost, but don't want to change anything on it (yet). They rather change things that have nothing to do with them. A Swarmhost is not affected by any anti-bio-air damage (as long as it's not lifted by a Phoenix ).

Playing around with the anti-bio-air damage does actually show that they see a problem with Mutalisks. And yes there is.
The Spore Crawler buff against bio was only implemented to counter the strength of Mutas.
In TvZ what was first, the Muta regen buff or the Widow Mine, is not important, but since the WMs were nerfed, Mutas are really hard to beat due to their regen.

So instead of throwing this anti-bio-air damage buff from one unit or structure to another to see where it looks the least awkward, why not just nerf the Muta regen rate? We could forget about the anti-bio-air damage then and even TvZ balance should look way better then. I'm not too sure about PvZ to be honest, but as far as I have seen Zergs don't rely on Mutas too much there (I may be wrong though).

Just for completeness: The problem of the Muta regen is that, as long as the Zerg just pokes and prods with them without losing any, the flock keeps on growing, eventually getting to numbers that can snipe anything that was actually meant to counter them (e.g. Thors). The high regen rate lets the Zerg player harass very often though, without leaving the opponent time to breath or even counterattack/-harass. The Mutas can basically harass one spot, then fly to another and by the time they get there, they're all back to full health. The opponent quite much has no choice but to turtle up like crazy or risk being picked apart slowly but surely.
With lower regen on Mutas the Zerg player can still choose to harass very much, but he'll eventually lose Mutas that he has to rebuild. Or he chooses to wait for them to fully regen, which would now take longer, giving the opponent the chance to strike back instead of running in circles inside his own base.
My Livestream: http://www.twitch.tv/burningranger | My youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/BurningR4nger
MarlieChurphy
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
United States2063 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-10 00:24:49
May 09 2014 10:02 GMT
#687
These suggested changes are stupid and bad.

That hydra buff is fucking absurd. People need to realize that it will do +4 vs every other unit the zerg has. Game will basically turn into mass hydra. I don't even think banes would play a part because hydras will be 2 shotting banes all game long.

No one would ever go air. roaches would melt. lings would melt. ultras would melt. swarmhosts would be the only thing to even hold them off.

And of course broodlords are the counter, but then we have abduct.


They just need to change the way the SH operates. Reduce the life of the locusts to like 3 each, make them spawn way faster (like lurker attack speed), and reduce the range of the locusts.


Honestly though, that is highly unlikely as blizz is supremely stubborn with this very poorly designed unit. A more realistic option is simply to add another upgrade to the infestation pit for swarm hosts.

Maybe something like remove this unit from the game for 200/200
RIP SPOR 11/24/11 NEVAR FORGET
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25188 Posts
May 09 2014 10:19 GMT
#688
Only does bonus to air bio man
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Ganseng
Profile Joined July 2011
Russian Federation473 Posts
May 09 2014 11:03 GMT
#689
i wonder if they just adjusted spore dmg to like 15+20 vs air instead of 15+30 so that spores kill mutas in 4 shots instead of 3 shots, and didn't mess with hydras, wouldn't that be a better option?
sparklyresidue
Profile Joined August 2011
United States5523 Posts
May 09 2014 11:08 GMT
#690
On May 09 2014 19:02 MarlieChurphy wrote:
These suggested changes are stupid and bad.

That hydra buff is fucking absurd. People need to realize that it will do +4 vs every other unit the zerg has. Game will basically turn into mass hydra. I don't even think banes would play a part because hydras will be 2 shotting banes all game long.

No one would ever go air. roaches would melt. lings would melt. ultras would melt. swarmhosts would be the only thing to even hold them off.

And of course broodlords are the counter, but then we have abduct.


They just need to change the way the SH operates. Reduce the life of the swarm hosts to like 3 each, make them spawn way faster (like lurker attack speed), and reduce the range of the locusts.


Honestly though, that is highly unlikely as blizz is supremely stubborn with this very poorly designed unit. A more realistic option is simply to add another upgrade to the infestation pit for swarm hosts.

Maybe something like remove this unit from the game for 200/200

every other AIR unit zerg has
roach still better
Like Tinkerbelle, I leave behind a sparkly residue.
random hero
Profile Joined October 2013
Germany31 Posts
May 09 2014 11:17 GMT
#691
I think swarmhosts are great, at least for me as a spectator. They give the chance that a game can (rarely) develop into a ridicuous 90 minute stalemate. Actually more some kind of exhaustion game between the two players, because they constantly fight for mineraly efficiency to wear out the opponent. It would suck if this would happen all the time, but so far its a relatively minor appearance (to me).

I like the concept of swarmhost, they are indeed a dreadful menace to the enemy, they can slowly and heartlessly destroy your valuable units for free. I fear swarm host. But there is little more satisfieing in SC2, especially from spectator point of view, than finally blinking on top of the helpless swarmhosts, after long outmaneuvering, or a strong colossus frontal attack, and to freaking roast those b******.

I like the tension they create. As long as swarmhost vs. swarmhost or urltralon stalemate games don't become the standard, I'm absolutely fine with them. Love them! I don't get the general hate..

1984 is now
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
May 09 2014 14:06 GMT
#692
On May 09 2014 20:17 random hero wrote:
I think swarmhosts are great, at least for me as a spectator. They give the chance that a game can (rarely) develop into a ridicuous 90 minute stalemate. Actually more some kind of exhaustion game between the two players, because they constantly fight for mineraly efficiency to wear out the opponent. It would suck if this would happen all the time, but so far its a relatively minor appearance (to me).

I like the concept of swarmhost, they are indeed a dreadful menace to the enemy, they can slowly and heartlessly destroy your valuable units for free. I fear swarm host. But there is little more satisfieing in SC2, especially from spectator point of view, than finally blinking on top of the helpless swarmhosts, after long outmaneuvering, or a strong colossus frontal attack, and to freaking roast those b******.

I like the tension they create. As long as swarmhost vs. swarmhost or urltralon stalemate games don't become the standard, I'm absolutely fine with them. Love them! I don't get the general hate..



I like SH because they remind me of siege tanks in brood war. Long range monsters you can never directly engage that forces the enemy army to maneuver like a mad man. They have problems, yes, and the ZvZ problem with them is absurd, at least air superiority in tvt (both bw and sc2) allows mech vs mech to break each other, in ZvZ the only counter to mass swarm host is even more swarm hosts.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
May 09 2014 14:12 GMT
#693
On May 09 2014 23:06 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 09 2014 20:17 random hero wrote:
I think swarmhosts are great, at least for me as a spectator. They give the chance that a game can (rarely) develop into a ridicuous 90 minute stalemate. Actually more some kind of exhaustion game between the two players, because they constantly fight for mineraly efficiency to wear out the opponent. It would suck if this would happen all the time, but so far its a relatively minor appearance (to me).

I like the concept of swarmhost, they are indeed a dreadful menace to the enemy, they can slowly and heartlessly destroy your valuable units for free. I fear swarm host. But there is little more satisfieing in SC2, especially from spectator point of view, than finally blinking on top of the helpless swarmhosts, after long outmaneuvering, or a strong colossus frontal attack, and to freaking roast those b******.

I like the tension they create. As long as swarmhost vs. swarmhost or urltralon stalemate games don't become the standard, I'm absolutely fine with them. Love them! I don't get the general hate..



I like SH because they remind me of siege tanks in brood war. Long range monsters you can never directly engage that forces the enemy army to maneuver like a mad man. They have problems, yes, and the ZvZ problem with them is absurd, at least air superiority in tvt (both bw and sc2) allows mech vs mech to break each other, in ZvZ the only counter to mass swarm host is even more swarm hosts.


Tanks in brood war didn't have 67 range.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24194 Posts
May 09 2014 14:14 GMT
#694
I actually quite enjoy SHs when they're not fighting themselves too, and think, like BurningRanger, that the real problem lays in muta regen being so strong it forces to nullify any air play attempt if you don't want every ZvZ to be mutas vs mutas. Recent trends show that mutas could be strong too in ZvT, so I think it could be a good thing if a balance test map with a toned down muta regen was launched.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
May 09 2014 14:18 GMT
#695
On May 09 2014 23:14 [PkF] Wire wrote:
I actually quite enjoy SHs when they're not fighting themselves too, and think, like BurningRanger, that the real problem lays in muta regen being so strong it forces to nullify any air play attempt if you don't want every ZvZ to be mutas vs mutas. Recent trends show that mutas could be strong too in ZvT, so I think it could be a good thing if a balance test map with a toned down muta regen was launched.


Mutas are too strong in ZvT, ZvP, and ZvZ. They were overbuffed by blizzard for HotS. Blizzard had no way to fix it in ZvZ other than a really stupid spore crawler buff. Protoss has no answer other than phoenix (nothing ground based works, and it's a serious design problem when you cannot defeat air harass units with ground based defenses no matter how hard you try), and terran's massive anti-air army is struggling against them, despite marines, thors, widow mines, and very strong static defense (turrets are super good).
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
polpot
Profile Joined April 2012
3002 Posts
May 09 2014 14:25 GMT
#696
On May 09 2014 20:17 random hero wrote:
I think swarmhosts are great, at least for me as a spectator. They give the chance that a game can (rarely) develop into a ridicuous 90 minute stalemate. Actually more some kind of exhaustion game between the two players, because they constantly fight for mineraly efficiency to wear out the opponent. It would suck if this would happen all the time, but so far its a relatively minor appearance (to me).

I like the concept of swarmhost, they are indeed a dreadful menace to the enemy, they can slowly and heartlessly destroy your valuable units for free. I fear swarm host. But there is little more satisfieing in SC2, especially from spectator point of view, than finally blinking on top of the helpless swarmhosts, after long outmaneuvering, or a strong colossus frontal attack, and to freaking roast those b******.

I like the tension they create. As long as swarmhost vs. swarmhost or urltralon stalemate games don't become the standard, I'm absolutely fine with them. Love them! I don't get the general hate..


I agree, the Swarmhost is a great unit, it give some depth to the zerg arsenal and allow defensive macro play
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24194 Posts
May 09 2014 14:25 GMT
#697
[B]Mutas are too strong in ZvT, ZvP, and ZvZ. They were overbuffed by blizzard for HotS. Blizzard had no way to fix it in ZvZ other than a really stupid spore crawler buff. Protoss has no answer other than phoenix (nothing ground based works, and it's a serious design problem when you cannot defeat air harass units with ground based defenses no matter how hard you try), and terran's massive anti-air army is struggling against them, despite marines, thors, widow mines, and very strong static defense (turrets are super good).


Exactly, and people are only starting to realize that because let's face it, release widow mine was imba and P has excellent ways to play against mutas (though you kinda need pheonix, yeah). I really wish muta regen was put under further scrutiny.
superpanda27
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
111 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-09 14:32:50
May 09 2014 14:31 GMT
#698
On May 09 2014 18:16 BurningRanger wrote:
Blizzard's way to deal with this is rather strange.
They see a problem with the Swarmhost, but don't want to change anything on it (yet). They rather change things that have nothing to do with them. A Swarmhost is not affected by any anti-bio-air damage (as long as it's not lifted by a Phoenix ).

Playing around with the anti-bio-air damage does actually show that they see a problem with Mutalisks. And yes there is.
The Spore Crawler buff against bio was only implemented to counter the strength of Mutas.
In TvZ what was first, the Muta regen buff or the Widow Mine, is not important, but since the WMs were nerfed, Mutas are really hard to beat due to their regen.

So instead of throwing this anti-bio-air damage buff from one unit or structure to another to see where it looks the least awkward, why not just nerf the Muta regen rate? We could forget about the anti-bio-air damage then and even TvZ balance should look way better then. I'm not too sure about PvZ to be honest, but as far as I have seen Zergs don't rely on Mutas too much there (I may be wrong though).

Just for completeness: The problem of the Muta regen is that, as long as the Zerg just pokes and prods with them without losing any, the flock keeps on growing, eventually getting to numbers that can snipe anything that was actually meant to counter them (e.g. Thors). The high regen rate lets the Zerg player harass very often though, without leaving the opponent time to breath or even counterattack/-harass. The Mutas can basically harass one spot, then fly to another and by the time they get there, they're all back to full health. The opponent quite much has no choice but to turtle up like crazy or risk being picked apart slowly but surely.
With lower regen on Mutas the Zerg player can still choose to harass very much, but he'll eventually lose Mutas that he has to rebuild. Or he chooses to wait for them to fully regen, which would now take longer, giving the opponent the chance to strike back instead of running in circles inside his own base.


Blizzard is mostly addressing the concerns of ZvZ swarmhosts not ZvP or ZvT swarmhosts. It is not an easy fix in the other matchups whereas the swarmhost strategy in ZvZ needs a stronger counter strategy since there does not seem to be one.

It's not all about the muta, it's about the inability to use air against the turtle swarmhost due to Vipers and the spore crawler's bonus damage to bio-air. With this proposed changed it allows broodlords more time and more damage output against spore crawlers and eventually against swarmhosts. It is so hard for another player to beat an entrenched swarmhost player hiding behind a good amount of static D and vipers.

This again makes mutas more viable for longer in ZvZ if opponent is not going muta themselves. Opposed to spore crawlers, a roach hydra force can be more mobile in dealing with a larger muta flock when previously it would be hard to if the roach hydra player does not have a good amount of hydras. In other to quash the SH vs SH, I think they need to make the broodlord and only the broodlord un-abductable as making all massive units un-abductable would drastically change ZvT and ZvP.

-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
May 09 2014 14:36 GMT
#699
On May 09 2014 23:25 polpot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 09 2014 20:17 random hero wrote:
I think swarmhosts are great, at least for me as a spectator. They give the chance that a game can (rarely) develop into a ridicuous 90 minute stalemate. Actually more some kind of exhaustion game between the two players, because they constantly fight for mineraly efficiency to wear out the opponent. It would suck if this would happen all the time, but so far its a relatively minor appearance (to me).

I like the concept of swarmhost, they are indeed a dreadful menace to the enemy, they can slowly and heartlessly destroy your valuable units for free. I fear swarm host. But there is little more satisfieing in SC2, especially from spectator point of view, than finally blinking on top of the helpless swarmhosts, after long outmaneuvering, or a strong colossus frontal attack, and to freaking roast those b******.

I like the tension they create. As long as swarmhost vs. swarmhost or urltralon stalemate games don't become the standard, I'm absolutely fine with them. Love them! I don't get the general hate..


I agree, the Swarmhost is a great unit, it give some depth to the zerg arsenal and allow defensive macro play

Or they could give us useful Lurkers instead if you want defensive macro play. They would force tanks or Collosi or air units from both Terran or Toss. They would revive tank use in TvZ outside of pure Mech play.
kaluro
Profile Joined November 2011
Netherlands760 Posts
May 09 2014 14:39 GMT
#700
On May 07 2014 02:30 Noocta wrote:
Show nested quote +
Drastic changes to the way the Swarm Host currently works could affect the game negatively, as the unit plays a key role in various matchups.


But.. WHERE ?
Seriously, I haven't seen Swarm Host being used outside of the stalemate type of games. At all.

Why not changing the cause of the problem instead of always going around it....


The cause of the problems are:

In ZvZ the powerful static defense makes it possible to go mass swarm hosts without having a direct counter to it.
In ZvP Swarm hosts aren't a problem and can be dealt with adequately, stalemates don't occur.
In ZvT The problem is ravens with point defense drones. Once they get a critical mass of ravens, The game will never go anywhere unless the terran decides to do something. But david kim already said that Ravens are being looked into.

Swarm hosts are a reaction to certain terran/protoss plays and also a counter-reaction to zvz swarmhost plays.
They are not a cause.
www.twitch.tv/kaluroo - 720p60fps - Remember the name! - Don't do your best, do whatever it takes.
Prev 1 33 34 35 36 37 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 2m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 183
Nathanias 181
StarCraft: Brood War
Sexy 50
NaDa 18
Bale 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever722
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1301
taco 257
Coldzera 226
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox90
Liquid`Ken36
Other Games
summit1g11628
tarik_tv8991
Grubby2170
Day[9].tv781
C9.Mang0213
Maynarde112
ViBE110
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1335
BasetradeTV48
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta74
• Hupsaiya 37
• RyuSc2 37
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota23224
League of Legends
• Doublelift3840
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur222
Other Games
• Scarra1418
• imaqtpie1062
• Day9tv781
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
10h 2m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 11h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.