|
United States8476 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:41 DarkLordOlli wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 05:18 TT1 wrote:On June 27 2013 03:15 DarkLordOlli wrote:On June 26 2013 19:54 TT1 wrote:On June 06 2013 06:54 Dodgin wrote:On June 06 2013 06:49 ROOTT1 wrote:On June 06 2013 06:45 Dodgin wrote:
I read your post, he shouldn't be in the " close but no cigar " category because he's not close. his record is bad, his games look bad. I'd love to see him look good but he doesn't look good. ah ok, so your one of those dudes(95% of tlers) who just waits for someone to win a gsl or go on a huge winstreak before calling them good. takes alot of knowledge to do that no, I've watched all his games and I think he plays poorly. especially his macro, It's just awful. there's a reason you're the only one in the entire thread lobbying for a spot for him on the list. wat did i tell u about fantasy bro.. 10-3 in his last 13 games tt To be fair, Fantasy did step it up a LOT only very recently. and i quote "ah ok, so your one of those dudes(95% of tlers) who just waits for someone to win a gsl or go on a huge winstreak before calling them good. takes alot of knowledge to do that" .. its easy to call someone good once he starts winning Yeah but I don't think he means just that, neither do I. The way he's been playing more recently is a lot more impressive than before. It just seems a lot smoother, he's macroing better, his decisionmaking is sharper. The wins are just a result of that I feel. Like, a few weeks ago he would not have played that well vs Life. He'd have gotten supply blocked multiple times, floated tons of money, etc. as he did before.
It's funny cause that's exactly what he did against Life. Yet he still managed to win.
|
Austria24417 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:45 monk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 05:41 DarkLordOlli wrote:On June 27 2013 05:18 TT1 wrote:On June 27 2013 03:15 DarkLordOlli wrote:On June 26 2013 19:54 TT1 wrote:On June 06 2013 06:54 Dodgin wrote:On June 06 2013 06:49 ROOTT1 wrote:On June 06 2013 06:45 Dodgin wrote:
I read your post, he shouldn't be in the " close but no cigar " category because he's not close. his record is bad, his games look bad. I'd love to see him look good but he doesn't look good. ah ok, so your one of those dudes(95% of tlers) who just waits for someone to win a gsl or go on a huge winstreak before calling them good. takes alot of knowledge to do that no, I've watched all his games and I think he plays poorly. especially his macro, It's just awful. there's a reason you're the only one in the entire thread lobbying for a spot for him on the list. wat did i tell u about fantasy bro.. 10-3 in his last 13 games tt To be fair, Fantasy did step it up a LOT only very recently. and i quote "ah ok, so your one of those dudes(95% of tlers) who just waits for someone to win a gsl or go on a huge winstreak before calling them good. takes alot of knowledge to do that" .. its easy to call someone good once he starts winning Yeah but I don't think he means just that, neither do I. The way he's been playing more recently is a lot more impressive than before. It just seems a lot smoother, he's macroing better, his decisionmaking is sharper. The wins are just a result of that I feel. Like, a few weeks ago he would not have played that well vs Life. He'd have gotten supply blocked multiple times, floated tons of money, etc. as he did before. It's funny cause that's exactly what he did against Life. Yet he still managed to win.
He did but... better. He had good control to make up for it and his macro wasn't all that horrible. I mean, a player of his calibre is bound to be a fucking beast when he starts to operate smoothly.
|
I think it's about time Bisu was #1
|
If only Innovation were a more interesting player (as a persona/character), but as is he's very bland. His skill is undoubtedly very impressive, yet that in my opinion is almost wasted if the person behind it is as boring as a sack of sand.
|
On June 27 2013 06:12 Elucidate wrote:
If only Innovation were a more interesting player (as a persona/character), but as is he's very bland. His skill is undoubtedly very impressive, yet that in my opinion is almost wasted if the person behind it is as boring as a sack of sand.
I don't think it's wasted at all, people should still be fully capable of admiring the skill he displays at StarCraft. Expecting him to be entertaining outside of the game is unfair considering his job is to play (and win, which requires practices not partying) Starcraft games.
|
On June 27 2013 06:12 Elucidate wrote:
If only Innovation were a more interesting player (as a persona/character), but as is he's very bland. His skill is undoubtedly very impressive, yet that in my opinion is almost wasted if the person behind it is as boring as a sack of sand.
Let's be fair, one interview doesn't really show all of your personality..
|
On June 27 2013 22:09 7mk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 27 2013 06:12 Elucidate wrote:
If only Innovation were a more interesting player (as a persona/character), but as is he's very bland. His skill is undoubtedly very impressive, yet that in my opinion is almost wasted if the person behind it is as boring as a sack of sand. Let's be fair, one interview doesn't really show all of your personality..
No but personality doesn't wait for an invitation before showing up the party either.
Granted I think a sack of sand is significantly less interesting than innovation but he's no FBH. And I'm okay with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
