EPT4k posts and you're not aware of that meme ? O_o
On topic, my FPL team is just going more and more downwards every week. Not having KT as a team is really hard to overcome.
Fantasy Proleague '12-13 Round 1 - Page 83
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
View results and standings here. | ||
|
VyingsP
France174 Posts
4k posts and you're not aware of that meme ? O_o On topic, my FPL team is just going more and more downwards every week. Not having KT as a team is really hard to overcome. | ||
|
Creegz
Canada354 Posts
On December 30 2012 05:05 VyingsP wrote: 4k posts and you're not aware of that meme ? O_o On topic, my FPL team is just going more and more downwards every week. Not having KT as a team is really hard to overcome. Mine too, I picked Stephano as captain. Zero was a bad anti-team move. I finally traded him out after he lost me 12 points. My team is not great, only thing giving me points really is Best, JYP and SKT1  | ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On December 30 2012 05:05 VyingsP wrote: 4k posts and you're not aware of that meme ? O_o On topic, my FPL team is just going more and more downwards every week. Not having KT as a team is really hard to overcome. Yeah, anyone who had Flash + KT on their FPL was pretty much carried to the top. Hell, you could have an all KT FPL and probably win. Flash, Stats, Lizzy, Action, Wooki, Crazy (or add in someone like Dear) and you pwn mad noobs. Didn't think KT would be so dominant. | ||
|
Ophe
Sweden388 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
| ||
|
rice_devOurer
United States773 Posts
On December 30 2012 04:36 slowbacontron wrote: The answer to your question is on the very page you're posting on. Reading is a useful skill toi have. wait, so does this mean that i can join? i regret not signing up. | ||
|
Proseat
Germany5113 Posts
On December 30 2012 09:21 rice_devOurer wrote: wait, so does this mean that i can join? i regret not signing up. Yes, as soon as this round wraps up and things have been re-set, you will be able to join in the fun. On December 30 2012 07:43 R1CH wrote: Pretty happy with how I'm doing considering I had Sea and Stephano in week 1. Yeah, I agree, I will not be able to catch you anymore in our group.  My initial lineup was too conservative a pick. And I was also (and still am) stuck with Sea (and HoeJJa). But as the weeks went by I made more and more progress and getting the hang of it. I'm looking forward to Round 2. I wonder how (or if) you will tweak the system to fit with an all-kill format?By the way, R1CH, there are two things I wonder about that you may be able to answer: 1) On the Trade tab, at the bottom in the player tables, you can see how many participants (and who) own (O), bought (B), or sold (S) a player. While skimming through it, I came upon Anti-  Stephano who is listed as {O = 427, B = 458, S = 1} for the last update. Shouldn't the B value at least not exceed the O value (especially when S > 0)? I would assume the used formula is O = O' + B - S (O' being the old value, O the new one) but that doesn't add up here (O' would be negative)?What's also strange is that I bought Anti-  BeSt this week and I am listed on his anti O list, but not on his anti B list:http://www.teamliquid.net/fantasy/proleague/Owns.php?r=12&player=2500&anti=1 http://www.teamliquid.net/fantasy/proleague/Owns.php?r=12&player=2500&buy=1&anti=1 I sold Anti-  Light (to buy him as non-anti) and I show up on his anti S list and O list, but not on his B list:http://www.teamliquid.net/fantasy/proleague/Owns.php?r=12&player=2533&sell=1&anti=1 http://www.teamliquid.net/fantasy/proleague/Owns.php?r=12&player=2533&buy=1 http://www.teamliquid.net/fantasy/proleague/Owns.php?r=12&player=2533 2) Both on the Stats and Trade tabs in the player tables there is a column called "Adj TrVal" and "TrVal", respectively. How do these correlate? Is "TrVal" the initial trade value at the start of the round and only "Adj TrVal" as the adjusted trade value will fluctuate each week? I wonder because when I sort by "TrVal" the players are not in the order of the initial cost ($)? Thanks for shedding some light on this.  | ||
|
z0rz
United States350 Posts
| ||
|
Devise
Canada1131 Posts
| ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On December 30 2012 10:15 Proseat wrote: Yes, as soon as the this round wraps up and things have been re-set, you will be able to join in the fun. Yeah, I agree, I will not be able to catch you anymore in our group. My initial lineup was too conservative a pick. And I was also (and still am) stuck with Sea (and HoeJJa). But as the weeks went by I made more and more progress and getting the hang of it. I'm looking forward to Round 2. I wonder how (or if) you will tweak the system to fit with an all-kill format?By the way, R1CH, there are two things I wonder about that you may be able to answer: 1) On the Trade tab, at the bottom in the player tables, you can see how many participants (and who) own (O), bought (B), or sold (S) a player. While skimming through it, I came upon Anti-Stephano who is listed as {O = 427, B = 458, S = 1} for the last update. Shouldn't the B value at least not exceed the O value (especially when S > 0)? I would assume the formula O = O' + B - S (O' being the old value, O the new) but that doesn't add up here (O' would be negative)? Thanks for shedding some light on this. On anti, you are buying for greater, so wouldn't it make sense that O<B S=1 for the trade penalty, right? Or maybe it's Current Own Value, Buy Value, and then Sell Cost. In which case it still makes sense because Stephano has lost value since he was bought. Maybe I'm just an idiot and don't understand what you're talking about though | ||
|
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
A 4-0 by CJ tonight would be REALLY nice. | ||
|
Proseat
Germany5113 Posts
On December 30 2012 11:01 Dosey wrote: On anti, you are buying for greater, so wouldn't it make sense that O<B S=1 for the trade penalty, right? Or maybe it's Current Own Value, Buy Value, and then Sell Cost. In which case it still makes sense because Stephano has lost value since he was bought. Maybe I'm just an idiot and don't understand what you're talking about though No, it's not cost, nor does it have anything to do with the trading rules. It's the number of FPL participants who own (O), bought (B), or sold (S) a player that week. You can even click on the values to see who it is. R1CH will know what I mean. EDIT: link of original unabridged post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=17383280 | ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On December 30 2012 11:34 Proseat wrote: No, it's not cost, nor does it have anything to do with the trading rules. It's the number of FPL participants who own (O), bought (B), or sold (S) a player that week. You can even click on the values to see who it is. R1CH will know what I mean. Ah I misread what you were asking. Makes sense now. | ||
|
TehV747
180 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
| ||
|
Diks
Belgium1880 Posts
| ||
|
Incanus
Canada695 Posts
As far as I can tell trade tax goes on top of the value shown (in this case -1), and isn't included. | ||
|
ryuu_
United States1266 Posts
| ||
|
CellTech
Canada396 Posts
| ||
|
Proseat
Germany5113 Posts
On December 30 2012 15:43 Incanus wrote: Can someone explain why I have -1 for trading Light for Flying on my anti-team this last round? Light got 1 point for being on a winning team (Woonjin) and 1 point for being on the lineup, while Flying got 1 point for being on the winning team (Woonjin). Shouldn't it be +1? As far as I can tell trade tax goes on top of the value shown (in this case -1), and isn't included. You're talking about the Trade Gain, aren't you? The results for today's matches aren't updated yet. So the -1 for points gained from trade is only the trade tax so far. | ||
| ||
