EPTPeople need a good hard lesson that they are not entitled to direct interaction with players and officials for organizations.
Slayers to disband - Page 170
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Bashing of any sort will result in temp bans. | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
People need a good hard lesson that they are not entitled to direct interaction with players and officials for organizations. | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:30 TotalBiscuit wrote: I wouldn't have thought someone with 5,000 posts would be so prone to lying, but apparently they are. That is not what I stated AT ALL. What I actually said is very easy to find via my posting history. So long story short, quit lying like a child, it's embarrassing to read. If you twisted my words anymore they'd get dizzy. Some of you are fucking crazy, it's as simple as that. The reason we release statements is that interacting with people like you in the community is headache inducing and makes me want to punch a kitten. I know right? Somehow things go from "There's a korean statement coming out Sunday. We will release our statement Sunday night, and are working with a translator for a detailed response from Crank in the new few days" to "TB said the timing is important - they are trying to time it so Jessica can't respond to them". Because in a few days Jessica will suddenly become unable to respond to rebuttals. Oh the internet, sometimes the drama becomes just silly. | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
clause # 1: do the whole "he's going to release a statement." clause # 2: got accused of PR bullshit clause # 3: deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Those are the three separate action to the initial subject. By that definition they are deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Its either that or TB isn't able to use simple conjunction English words. Edit: now I think about it, it could very well be the later case, disappointed man. | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:30 TotalBiscuit wrote: I wouldn't have thought someone with 5,000 posts would be so prone to lying, but apparently they are. That is not what I stated AT ALL. What I actually said is very easy to find via my posting history. So long story short, quit lying like a child, it's embarrassing to read. If you twisted my words anymore they'd get dizzy. Some of you are fucking crazy, it's as simple as that. The reason we release statements is that interacting with people like you in the community is headache inducing and makes me want to punch a kitten. Don't punch kittens TB, pat pat. It's with in the right of any organization to deliver public statements when they want in a manner of their choosing, as long as it doesn't obscure the truth of the issue and remains professional. I believe it's called PR. | ||
|
Oktyabr
Singapore2234 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:38 Xiphos wrote: Subject = We clause # 1: do the whole "he's going to release a statement." clause # 2: got accused of PR bullshit clause # 3: deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Those are the three separate action to the initial subject. By that definition they are deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Its either that or TB isn't able to use simple conjunction English words. Or your comprehension is terrible. I could easily infer that he's being accused of: 1)PR bullshit AND 2)deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. You're trying too hard, lol. | ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
And i apologize for not seeing the first statement (was too much eSF-Stuff wrapped around it), but if you read the last 3 pages, they're all quoting the posting i did read, in which you did not mention CranK's statement, but just Axiom's. So it's not entirely my fault and i still can understand everyone who missed the first statement (which happens to be nearly 25 pages or so back). Still mate, you're kinda way too rude. Talking about a crazy and fucked up community, while being personal yourself all the time, meh. edit: @ TB | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:38 Xiphos wrote: Subject = We clause # 1: do the whole "he's going to release a statement." clause # 2: got accused of PR bullshit clause # 3: deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Those are the three separate action to the initial subject. By that definition they are deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Its either that or TB isn't able to use simple conjunction English words. Edit: now I think about it, it could very well be the later case, disappointed man. (We tried to just do the whole "he's going to release a statement") / (and got accused of) / (PR bullshit and deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it.) The problem is entirely you. | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:44 Oktyabr wrote: Or your comprehension is terrible. I could easily infer that he's being accused of: 1)PR bullshit AND 2)deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. You're trying too hard, lol. You just sucks at English. lmao User was warned for this post | ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:46 WolfintheSheep wrote: The problem is entirely you. Fixed that fox you. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
You just sucks at English. Statement of the century. | ||
|
Oktyabr
Singapore2234 Posts
Not really. I recognize that the sentence structure isn't perfect, but I don't spend 4 posts harping on it, while deliberately misinterpreting it in order to put him in bad light even after he has already indicated his frustration in his first reply back to you. And you just "sucks" at English? Really? The irony here... | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
Because "We deliberately timing..." apparently passes your understanding of English grammar. I suggest you stop wasting posts on petty semantics, because no one in their right mind is actually going to agree with you. | ||
|
ian952
Canada124 Posts
| ||
|
Xiphos
Canada7507 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:53 WolfintheSheep wrote: Because "We deliberately timing..." apparently passes your understanding of English grammar. I suggest you stop wasting posts on petty semantics, because no one in their right mind is actually going to agree with you. Say what you like. TB could have easily said "We got accused of PR bullshit in deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it." which would have made much more sense. He fucked it up and just to embarrassed to admit. And people you really stop valuing people higher than you in life just because of their 'fame'. On October 21 2012 11:52 Oktyabr wrote: Not really. I recognize that the sentence structure isn't perfect, but I don't spend 4 posts harping on it, while deliberately misinterpreting it in order to put him in bad light even after he has already indicated his frustration in his first reply back to you. And you just "sucks" at English? Really? The irony here... Because I'm a man here (unlike some other particular individual), I'll have to admit that it was down at very quick pace so yes I accidentely slipped in the 's'. There. But you are completely wrong because out of the 4 posts, only 1 was to systematically breaking down the word while the first one was really an intro to my thoughts, and the other two being a debate to a few people that decided to play the 'memory selection' game with themselves. | ||
|
Fyrewolf
United States1533 Posts
That's not even a proper english sentence. You are failing at writing english. Totalbiscuit's statement is grammatically correct and you are trying to argue something that just isn't true. His statement "We tried to just do the whole 'he's going to release a statement' and got accused of PR bullshit and deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it." is perfectly fine. It is literally impossible to interpret the part about timing to be separate as it is not preceded by a new verb(thus is still using "got accused of") and is using the past verb of couldn't rather than can't which would be necessary for the context you are trying to imply he is using. It's just not the case. You really need to work on your english. | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:55 ian952 wrote: You guys have to understand TB. Jessica has already killed MC, it's going to be a piece of cake to destroy Crank considering he was also on Slayers. TB doesn't want Crank's career to be ruined. There are two sides to every story, and I would not be the least bit surprised if most of the MMA/Crank drama boils down to 2 young people confronting an abrasive personality. | ||
Jimz1469
116 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:38 Xiphos wrote: Subject = We clause # 1: do the whole "he's going to release a statement." clause # 2: got accused of PR bullshit clause # 3: deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Those are the three separate action to the initial subject. By that definition they are deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it. Its either that or TB isn't able to use simple conjunction English words. Edit: now I think about it, it could very well be the later case, disappointed man. I don't post much on here and I greatly appreciate the in depth information on these boards but this sort of peanut gallery criticism taking one line totally out of context like a political commercial in the making makes me want to throw up. You should work for Fox News. | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:56 Xiphos wrote: Say what you like. TB could have easily said "We got accused of PR bullshit in deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it." which would have made much more sense. He fucked it up and just to embarrassed to admit. And people you really stop valuing people higher than you in life just because of their 'fame'. Yes, if absolutely no one else has issues interpreting his sentence properly, it's because you're the only sane man in the crowd. You spent an entire page of discussion harping on grammar and pretending that it meant something scandalous. It didn't. Deal with it. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On October 21 2012 11:56 Xiphos wrote: Say what you like. TB could have easily said "We got accused of PR bullshit in deliberately timing the statement so Jessica couldn't respond to it." which would have made much more sense. He fucked it up and just to embarrassed to admit. And people you really stop valuing people higher than you in life just because of their 'fame'. Because I'm a man here (unlike some other particular individual), I'll have to admit that it was down at very quick pace so yes I accidentely slipped in the 's'. There. But you are completely wrong because out of the 4 posts, only 1 was to systematically breaking down the word while the first one was really an intro to my thoughts, and the other two being a debate to a few people that decided to play the 'memory selection' game with themselves. "only 1 was to systematically breaking down the word" That doesn't even mean anything. My god, just admit that you were wrong and stop this "Your grammar wasn't perfect, therefore you're in the wrong here." Everyone understood what he meant. | ||
|
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
 | ||
| ||
