|
On September 25 2012 14:54 Wrathsc2 wrote: the thing i dont understand is why she would need to do this lol. ur a girl...being in masters makes u popular enough...
Well that's like asking why rich people commit white collar crime.
|
On September 25 2012 14:48 Kennigit wrote: Yeah i just want to make sure i have everyone. only if you can ban every single pro who'r providing lvling service
|
On September 25 2012 14:49 PanN wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 14:47 Kennigit wrote: K so who do i ban, The girl and deathangel? The girl permanently at least. Says she's sorry yet she could have done anything to stop it, instead she let it go on. She lied to players she coached saying shes gm. She put down a "protoss player" that she didn't even beat, and apparently brags all around. She bragged, yet feels "sorry". I don't believe that garbage for a minute.
she is only sorry that she got caught.
|
On September 25 2012 14:57 Doomwish wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 14:49 PanN wrote:On September 25 2012 14:47 Kennigit wrote: K so who do i ban, The girl and deathangel? The girl permanently at least. Says she's sorry yet she could have done anything to stop it, instead she let it go on. She lied to players she coached saying shes gm. She put down a "protoss player" that she didn't even beat, and apparently brags all around. She bragged, yet feels "sorry". I don't believe that garbage for a minute. she is only sorry that she got caught.
Yeah no kidding. Anybody that believes her apology is completely blind.
|
On September 25 2012 14:54 -Cyrus- wrote: I don't think Deathangel deserves a permanent ban. As far as we know, he at the very least did not realize the gravity of his actions as the girl did. I think he deserves a chance to prove himself as a player even though he did make a mistake smurfing on her account.
No, he definitely knew what was going on. Perma ban IMO.
|
On September 25 2012 14:54 Wrathsc2 wrote: the thing i dont understand is why she would need to do this lol. ur a girl...being in masters makes u popular enough... You can be in bronze as a women and still get more viewers than a top masters guy.
|
On September 25 2012 14:54 Wrathsc2 wrote: the thing i dont understand is why she would need to do this lol. ur a girl...being in masters makes u popular enough...
I actually don't believe she was even diamond.
|
On September 25 2012 14:57 skyflyfish wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 14:48 Kennigit wrote: Yeah i just want to make sure i have everyone. only if you can ban every single pro who'r providing lvling service
If you can't currently see the difference between simple leveling services and the situation at hand, you will honestly never understand it.
|
On September 25 2012 14:57 skyflyfish wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 14:48 Kennigit wrote: Yeah i just want to make sure i have everyone. only if you can ban every single pro who'r providing lvling service
theres a big difference between a pro leveling an account and a pro playing under someone else s name to make them money.
|
On September 25 2012 14:57 skyflyfish wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 14:48 Kennigit wrote: Yeah i just want to make sure i have everyone. only if you can ban every single pro who'r providing lvling service
Every single pro who's providing leveling service isn't also a male playing in a females-only tournament under a female ID and then keeping the money for himself.
|
On September 25 2012 14:58 Angry.Zerg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 14:54 Wrathsc2 wrote: the thing i dont understand is why she would need to do this lol. ur a girl...being in masters makes u popular enough... I actually don't believe she was even diamond. Her account before the gigantic jump to GM was in plat
|
deathangel's reply is such a joke
|
DeathAngel, what is your reply to VeraLynn's post
|
On September 25 2012 14:47 Kennigit wrote: K so who do i ban, The girl and deathangel? The girl definitely. Hearing things in PMs that make me even more inclined to believe her "apology" is insincere and may be twisted either in facts or words to make DeathAngel appear more at fault than he is.
|
Man, I'm late. Would like to thank KawaiiRice, Gretorp, and desRow for sleuthing and bringing this article to the community. You deserve all the complements you're getting.
We should remember that this stuff takes time and effort. You can't get intellectually lazy when it comes to issues as serious as this, and it seems that the aforementioned "three amigos" have remained vigilant throughout their investigation and skillfully, as well as tactfully, brought this issue to light. Makes it more awesome to realize this. Also, is anyone else feeling the general positivity surrounding this thread? Like it's bad in one way, but in a sense it's good that this came to light. I <3 TL.
|
On September 25 2012 14:57 skyflyfish wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 14:48 Kennigit wrote: Yeah i just want to make sure i have everyone. only if you can ban every single pro who'r providing lvling service
The issue is not about being leveled. It's about the fact that she then pretended like she was a legitimate GM player and used that status for coaching. Also the fact that she paid deathangel to play on her stream for her etc.
|
Pretty sure the only way to settle this is a Kawaii Rice v. Death Angel showmatch. If Kawaii wins he gets the Veralynn earnings and Death Angel is officially banned from SC2. If Death Angel wins Kawaii will have to pay him a large fee for slander and publicly apologize.
This way we will have a showmatch actually worth something. After watching the Packers and Seahawks, (seriously fuk those refs) I believe controversy is essential, especially for a game where one can only identify a player through a screen name and a color.
|
On September 25 2012 15:02 My_Fake_Plastic_Luv wrote: Pretty sure the only way to settle this is a Kawaii Rice v. Death Angel showmatch. If Kawaii wins he gets the Veralynn earnings and Death Angel is officially banned from SC2. If Death Angel wins Kawaii will have to pay him a large fee for slander and publicly apologize.
This way we will have a showmatch actually worth something. After watching the Packers and Seahawks, (seriously fuk those refs) I believe controversy is essential, especially for a game where one can only identify a player through a screen name and a color.
So basically.. Trial by combat?
|
On September 25 2012 15:01 mGGLearning wrote: Man, I'm late. Would like to thank KawaiiRice, Gretorp, and desRow for sleuthing and bringing this article to the community. You deserve all the complements you're getting.
We should remember that this stuff takes time and effort. You can't get intellectually lazy when it comes to issues as serious as this, and it seems that the aforementioned "three amigos" have remained vigilant throughout their investigation and skillfully, as well as tactfully, brought this issue to light. Makes it more awesome to realize this. Also, is anyone else feeling the general positivity surrounding this thread? Like it's bad in one way, but in a sense it's good that this came to light. I <3 TL.
Well overall I'd say it's awesome that we have members of this community so dedicated to keeping e-sports honest that they'll go through the effort required to prove accusations like this.
|
On September 25 2012 15:02 My_Fake_Plastic_Luv wrote: Pretty sure the only way to settle this is a Kawaii Rice v. Death Angel showmatch. If Kawaii wins he gets the Veralynn earnings and Death Angel is officially banned from SC2. If Death Angel wins Kawaii will have to pay him a large fee for slander and publicly apologize.
This way we will have a showmatch actually worth something. After watching the Packers and Seahawks, (seriously fuk those refs) I believe controversy is essential, especially for a game where one can only identify a player through a screen name and a color. that's retarded
|
|
|
|