EPTI don't think anyone would argue that terran just has the strongest code S lineup.
Top Tier Korean ZvT and TvZ TLPD statistics - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
I don't think anyone would argue that terran just has the strongest code S lineup. | ||
|
Hall0wed
United States8486 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: How the fuck is 64% not good? Obviously it is all relevant. Compare that 64% to some of the win% in other matchups and 64% is quite weak. | ||
|
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:28 cozzE wrote: Zerg's are allowed to dominate the shit out of ZvP yet when they're dominated by very highly mechanically skilled Terrans that simply can't be allowed. Your logic here is clearly flawed and it's a blatant balance whine. I'm not trolling/baiting etc. I'm just calling out something that is obvious. Meanwhile protoss generally dominate these "very highly mechanically skilled terrans" Also, there arent many zergs that have a very high winrate vs protoss. Especially right now. EDIT: Same zergs vs protoss DRG - 72.97% Nestea - 75.86% Leenock - 44.19% Curious - 61.11% July - 57.45% Symbol - 61.54% | ||
|
MaNaVoId
492 Posts
| ||
|
acrimoneyius
United States983 Posts
Makes you wonder if they'll ever put in a marine range upgrade (but that would possibly screw up TvP) | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:24 Gator wrote: conclusion: having 300 apm and sick multitasking makes you good at TvZ Being good at the game makes you... good at the game? O.o | ||
|
neoghaleon55
United States7435 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:24 Mentalizor wrote: When you "only" have a 50 game sample (DRG's ZvT is 50games) small mistakes, missmicroes can easilly cost 2-5 games. if just 5 games a lost due to mistakes, that will alter your statistics by 10% which is pretty much. Get bigger samples before comparing statistics. They are just not viable to look at. The optimal minimum sample size is 20. Above 20, the n value does not relevantly contribute over all (n-1) to the statistics. I'm sure you remember from your AP stats class and college. The statistics presented in the OP are greater than 20 sample sizes and thus are relevant. | ||
Azzur
Australia6267 Posts
DRG's win/loss against terran was in the backdrop of terran domination and when protoss was struggling. This means that when he gets into the end stages of tournaments, he is facing good terrans. On the other hand, protoss struggling means that his win-rate against protoss may be higher because he faces weaker opponents. Now, protoss is doing well, and you can begin to see a fall in his win rate. | ||
|
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
| ||
|
WeaponX.7
Canada52 Posts
| ||
|
MaNaVoId
492 Posts
| ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: How the fuck is 64% not good? It's relative. DRG is arguably the best Zerg in the world right now, and his ZvT had been perceived as amazing. To discover that it is actually his weakest MU, and his rival MMA has a TvZ 16% higher, is pretty surprising. | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
| ||
|
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
| ||
|
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:34 Whatson wrote: Thank you OP for firmly supporting my belief that MMA is a TvZ god... MMA is shining proof that just blindly dropping marines all over the place is hard to handle for zerg and almost always cost efficient. | ||
|
X3GoldDot
Malaysia3840 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:28 cozzE wrote: Zerg's are allowed to dominate the shit out of ZvP yet when they're dominated by very highly mechanically skilled Terrans that simply can't be allowed...... Your logic here is clearly flawed and it's a blatant balance whine. I'm not trolling/baiting etc. I'm just calling out something that is obvious. ROFL, top protosses are killing zerg right now, get ur facts straight b4 complaining. | ||
|
Gecko4lif
United States42 Posts
Terrans Puma (Yes he is korean but he is Eg so I consider him one of us) vZ: 59-29 (67.05%) Happy vZ: 184-77 (70.50%) Thorzain vZ: 89-63 (58.55%) BraT Ok vZ: 133-85 (61.01%) Sjow vZ: 164-133 (55.22%) Lucifron vZ: 24-15 (61.54%) Zerg Stephano vT: 188-102 (64.83%) Nerchio vT: 323-176 (64.73%) violet (Same situation as puma) vT: 75-38 (66.37%) Ret vT: 101-82 (55.19%) Sen vT: 57-41 (58.16%) sLivko vT: 59-67 (46.83%) There is still a bit of a gap | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:35 TheRabidDeer wrote: MMA is shining proof that just blindly dropping marines all over the place is hard to handle for zerg and almost always cost efficient. Which is exactly why i do it ^^ | ||
|
Diomedes7
67 Posts
| ||
|
hunts
United States2113 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: How the fuck is 64% not good? 64% may be good for a sub par player, but nnot for a champion like DRG or nestea | ||
| ||
