data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
GSL Season 2 Code S players (Polt & NaNiwa seeded) - Page 14
Forum Index > SC2 General |
EternalAce
Denmark8 Posts
![]() | ||
pepe08
Germany566 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:08 Elean wrote: They really don't want to seed Puma... He is by far the player with the most achievements in the foreign scene. /edit nvm, i cant read... | ||
Consummate
Australia191 Posts
How Gom is to blame is beyond me, but you see this everytime a foreigner is knocked out of the tournament. | ||
Elean
689 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:11 FakeDeath wrote: Are you serious? I thought GOM said they will invite players with great achievements in the foreign scene regardless of nationality into Code S. I don't know, maybe Puma declined because he wants to try code A qualifier again. | ||
Seraphone
United Kingdom1219 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:10 ceaRshaf wrote: 3rd place is better than 8th but again, only you look at trophies. I look at who they actually beat. And Ret and Demuslim if they perform once more like this to prove that wasn't a lucky day (like hypro) then sure, it means they got what it takes to beat koreans. And you still bring the strategies from the naniwas games. The 2 gate proxy in the 3rd game vs Nestea was 10 times more brilliant (especially from a metagame point of view) than the 9 gates of huk in every matchup. And stop defending Stephano, he doesn't want to compete in GSL anyways. So why are you allowed to ignore results, but only take account of who a player beat and yet completely ignore what actually happened in the match? That seems extremely selective and dumb. So in your bizzare world of wanting Naniwa to get Code S at all costs what matters is not where you finish in tournament but how many good (and of course good is relative to whether you played Naniwa or not seen as Oz in PvP is apparently worth less than Leenock in ZvP) players you beat but what has even less relevance than where you finished in a tournament is how you actually won your games. That makes total sense... | ||
Zeon0
Austria2995 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:05 Rhaegar_tar wrote: Seraphone didn't say anything that bash all foreigners, i uderstand his points...Huk was third in MLG(he beat Oz and ret-who beat MVP-) and lost only to MKP, while Naniwa beat Nestea and Leenock(not the best ZvP out there) and lost to MKP and DRG. get your facts right, HuK lost to MKP and DRG, just like Naniwa. | ||
Tanatos
United States381 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:11 FakeDeath wrote: Are you serious? I thought GOM said they will invite players with great achievements in the foreign scene regardless of nationality into Code S. Polt got seed. Also Violet was the winner of IEM San Paulo. I believe Violet deserve the seed more than Puma and Naniwa. | ||
FakeDeath
Malaysia6060 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:15 Tanatos wrote: Polt got seed. Also Violet was the winner of IEM San Paulo. I believe Violet deserve the seed more than Puma and Naniwa. I agreed with you.IMO Violet has been improving a lot and have been posting very good results lately. Stephano,Violet and Puma deserve the Code S more than Naniwa. | ||
zuperketla
Norway212 Posts
![]() | ||
Elean
689 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:15 Tanatos wrote: Polt got seed. Also Violet was the winner of IEM San Paulo. I believe Violet deserve the seed more than Puma and Naniwa. Violet ? for winning IEM San Paulo where koreans decided not to go because it was too far ? Yeah, right. This clearly outweight: 2nd IEM WC, 1 game away from taking the title Assembly 3rd 2nd Dreamhack winter, 1 game away from taking the title 2 times NASL champion 1rst IEM Cologne. | ||
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:15 Tanatos wrote: Polt got seed. Also Violet was the winner of IEM San Paulo. I believe Violet deserve the seed more than Puma and Naniwa. i disagree, violets achievements are not comparable to Pumas or even Polts in the foreign scene. And Naniwa IS a foreigner and that gives him a small bonus. | ||
Slardar
Canada7593 Posts
| ||
Asha
United Kingdom38149 Posts
| ||
Tofugrinder
Austria899 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:10 Logros wrote: You agree with Polt seed but not Naniwa? Polt dropped out of GSL in the first round of Code A only a few weeks ago. If you say well foreigner tournaments because Polt just won Assembly, then why disregard Naniwa's 2nd place at Providence (beating Nestea, Huk and DRG), his win of the global invitational (over MVP and Nestea) and his good run at the winter arena. after what Naniwa did in GSL I would life ban him from GSL,but other than that, Polt has shown really good results lately and Naniwa didn't do much lately - Providence was long time ago. There are obvisiously many koreans who had better results in the last months than naniwa | ||
RPR_Tempest
Australia7795 Posts
| ||
ThaSlayer
707 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:21 Elean wrote: Violet ? for winning IEM San Paulo where koreans decided not to go because it was too far ? Yeah, right. This clearly outweight: 2nd IEM WC, 1 game away from taking the title Assembly 3rd 2nd Dreamhack winter, 1 game away from taking the title 2 times NASL champion 1rst IEM Cologne. I think Puma's results are way more consistent than Naniwa's. He def deserves a seed IMO. Providence was pretty way back. | ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
vandelayindustries
United States290 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:26 Tofugrinder wrote: after what Naniwa did in GSL I would life ban him from GSL,but other than that, Polt has shown really good results lately and Naniwa didn't do much lately - Providence was long time ago. There are obvisiously many koreans who had better results in the last months than naniwa What, seriously? | ||
Nonnar
Sweden50 Posts
Haha, thank you good sir, this post made my day ![]() I think both Polt and Naniwa deserved the invites. Naniwas GSL record may be horrible but his overallrecord and his collection of scalps is extremely impressive. Hopefully he will prove himself now and silence the haters ![]() Polt & Naniwa Fighting!! | ||
Soma.bokforlag
Sweden448 Posts
On March 12 2012 22:26 Tofugrinder wrote: after what Naniwa did in GSL I would life ban him from GSL,but other than that, Polt has shown really good results lately and Naniwa didn't do much lately - Providence was long time ago. There are obvisiously many koreans who had better results in the last months than naniwa what have naniwa did that was controversial in the gsl? i know he threw a meaningless game in a little AoL-tourney.. but what have he done in gsl? | ||
| ||