EPTComplexity transfers NaNiwa to Quantic Gaming - Page 37
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Please make sure to read the statement from Naniwa that is linked in the full article before commenting. | ||
|
Kira__
Sweden2672 Posts
| ||
|
soulist
United States932 Posts
On December 09 2011 07:02 Zalithian wrote: It appears as if Naniwa LIED about Complexity and his situation. How you can see it as wrong that Jason was clarifying things is beyond me. Because maybe Jason cares about having good publicity therefore he would lie to make it seem like his brand didn't do anything wrong? Naniwa doesnt give a rats ass of what people think of him or he wouldnt have done the things he does. If I had to trust anyone in this situation I would trust Naniwa because he has no reason lie while Jason(complexity) does in order to keep a good image for their sponsors. | ||
|
FidoDido
United States1292 Posts
Major, Sase, Naniwa, Destiny, pretty good line up if you ask me | ||
|
leperphilliac
United States399 Posts
http://esfiworld.com/sc2/news/complexity-sells-naniwa-contract-quantic Of particular interest is the anonymous source that says Naniwa is extremely hard to work with and believes that he actually needs professional help. In Korea when I lived there clinical therapy wasn't very common, so I don't think Naniwa will have any opportunity get professional help there. Maybe being with Sase will stabilize him somewhat? | ||
|
vyru5
Singapore4 Posts
| ||
|
synaptik
Canada644 Posts
im glad complexity got rid of him though, shows that they're not above dumping a valuable asset if its destroying its rep and values. 10 bucks on nani not lasting a year on quantic. | ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
| ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
| ||
|
ronpaul012
United States769 Posts
| ||
|
Imbajoe
United States857 Posts
| ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:51 Golgotha wrote: Haters gonna hate. nani is a smart kid. he knows what he is doing. really good to hear that QIM is more Korea oriented. Except they are not QIM anymore, they dissolved that partnership. | ||
|
Maenander
Germany4927 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:45 leperphilliac wrote: Hm ESFI recently published their article on the whole transfer thing. http://esfiworld.com/sc2/news/complexity-sells-naniwa-contract-quantic Of particular interest is the anonymous source that says Naniwa is extremely hard to work with and believes that he actually needs professional help. In Korea when I lived there clinical therapy wasn't very common, so I don't think Naniwa will have any opportunity get professional help there. Maybe being with Sase will stabilize him somewhat? It could have been a nice article without an anonymous informer slinging mud, "he needs to seek professional help" sounds more like standard internet flaming than an informed opinion. | ||
|
ABear
United States161 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:45 leperphilliac wrote: Hm ESFI recently published their article on the whole transfer thing. http://esfiworld.com/sc2/news/complexity-sells-naniwa-contract-quantic Of particular interest is the anonymous source that says Naniwa is extremely hard to work with and believes that he actually needs professional help. In Korea when I lived there clinical therapy wasn't very common, so I don't think Naniwa will have any opportunity get professional help there. Maybe being with Sase will stabilize him somewhat? Wow that was an interesting article. Thanks for posting. | ||
|
Hydroxyl
206 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:22 Xxavi wrote: But with regards to this news, it doesn't surprise me. Naniwa doesn't seem to be a professional player, don't know whether he knows what that word is anyway. This impression you get from all of news that have come out so far since his ban from ESL. He seems to be having a bit of retard moments being too frank in public and saying what he thinks, and this way, talking trash to many people, even those who might be thinking they are friendly with him. So it is a no surprise. It will not be a surprise if he is isolated in Korea for his antics, and I fully expect that. However, Complexity doing their shitty interview with him where he trash talks about IMmvp and IMNesTea and a bit disrespectful to DRG (who is their partner from colMVP). Whoever did interview didn't think about censoring it even if Naniwa has not enough brain to censor his own words. Probably they thought it damages Naniwa more, if it damages, and not Complexity. Still, I had a bad impression from the fact that a Complexity staff interviews him, and even dwells on those trash talking moments, and then thinks it's OK to publish. I have a feeling that whoever did interview didn't even care about colMVP link, so he might have been completely cool with trash talking about MVP. To be honest pretty much everyone, from the casters themselves to the likes of Slasher, decided to start and feed this storyline of Naniwa the BM guy, by telling Nestea he got bm'ed by Naniwa in an interview without, voluntarily, thinking themselves, and telling Nestea, about the context and the real sence of what Naniwa was saying. Why? Because, according to them, instead of Starcraft content, it is what viewers want, and, since they think it will bring viewers to their show and tweets to their twitter, they are likely to transform esport into a "reality" (understand "artificial") show. Irony and faceplam ensuees as their storyline backfires in Naniwa's face and they feel like (to their words, they who put the fire to the forest) it has been too far, and Naniwa just takes the hate for unconsciously being the actor in the scenario they wrote. Now do they care if Naniwa takes home the dollars, or if someone else does, in fact Leenock, because he couldn't stand the pressure from the community's backlash? Of course not, they get their audience anyway, and the winner's money is gone nonetheless. Now you will see White knights appearing as it will serve their deeds, but tomorrow no damn care will given, as it will be another day of business, and no one will care about the progammers that are left behind. | ||
|
SkimGuy
Canada709 Posts
| ||
|
legendre20
United States316 Posts
| ||
|
Spicy_Curry
United States10573 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:55 Maenander wrote: It could have been a nice article without an anonymous informer slinging mud, "he needs to seek professional help" sounds more like standard internet flaming than an informed opinion. Using an anonymous source in an article completely discredits whoever edits the ESFI stories. Without a source who is willing to go on record you have nothing. What that basically means is that ESFI's journalist took a literal dump on Naniwa. For all we know that anonymous source could be the writer. How can he call himself a journalist, A statement like that CANNOT be made without having someone go on record. | ||
|
Full.tilt
United Kingdom1709 Posts
On December 09 2011 10:45 leperphilliac wrote: Hm ESFI recently published their article on the whole transfer thing. http://esfiworld.com/sc2/news/complexity-sells-naniwa-contract-quantic Of particular interest is the anonymous source that says Naniwa is extremely hard to work with and believes that he actually needs professional help. In Korea when I lived there clinical therapy wasn't very common, so I don't think Naniwa will have any opportunity get professional help there. Maybe being with Sase will stabilize him somewhat? That is so fucking pathetic to put in an anonymous source like that who is not related to any of the organisations involved. May as well take a quote from some random troll on TL... | ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
On December 09 2011 11:05 Spicy_Curry wrote: Using an anonymous source in an article completely discredits whoever edits the ESFI stories. Without a source who is willing to go on record you have nothing. What that basically means is that ESFI's journalist took a literal dump on Naniwa. For all we know that anonymous source could be the writer. How can he call himself a journalist, A statement like that CANNOT be made without having someone go on record. This is a bit overblown...how often to major, credible news souces cite "unnamed" and "anonymous" sources? All the time actually. Also, just because they name someone does not always add credit either. It just means to have to take it for the rumor it is, that is a lot of times how journalism works. I am not saying it is right, but it is what it is. | ||
|
reneg
United States859 Posts
First destiny, now NaNi, they're building quite the force | ||
| ||
