EPTEG vs mouz rivalry on twitter - Page 35
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Fleshcut
Germany592 Posts
| ||
|
IndridCold
United States385 Posts
Mouz has won the last two eg masters cups as a team, win for them. EG has won more 1v1 foreign tournaments (but has also attended far more i'm fairly safe to assume) win for them. EG has some GSL success, not much but in comparison to other teams outside TL and korea but its something, win for them. Mouz sending morrow and hopefully more players to Korea could change that. EG has more publicity with all the shows their players do, the EG lair, the streaming. win for them (although in europe could be closer) Overall its healthy to have a good rivalry against teams, i love it. I'm a EG fan now, but i liked Mouz alot in wc3 and i like thier players now as well. We really need a huge team league to breed more of these types of rivalries between all the teams.... mouz, 4k, mTw, and mYm rivalries in the WC3L was very interesting and always produced such good clan wars in wc3. We need that in sc2, all these 1v1 tournies are cool but i feel like the backbone of the scene needs to turn its focus more towards team leagues. Also it needs to turn away from all this travel from our stars but thats a different story entirely.... Anyways love the twitter trash talk between 2 great teams and 2 teams that need to be respected by fans of both. | ||
|
karpo
Sweden1998 Posts
On December 03 2011 19:32 Geo.Rion wrote: wow, you have some serious issue, MLG is regarded as the best or at least top3 tournament on the international scene, and has the most weight, what is your problem? If you read his post again you'll see that it's about measuring skill, not about how good the tournament is for viewers. | ||
|
KimJongChill
United States6429 Posts
 | ||
|
zeru
8156 Posts
| ||
|
BoomNasty
United States265 Posts
On December 03 2011 19:39 zeru wrote: Mouz already won it. EG masters cup twice :p and regarding their CS teams, lets just say Mouz has 68% win rate over 500+ official games since 2002, while EG has 54% win rate over 200+ official games since 2002. Every american 1.6 team is a free win against top euro teams the past 10 years though, since the days when team 3d broke. and mouz has always been a feared top 1.6 team. go look at one my posts earlier... they are 2-2 in head-to-head matches | ||
|
zeru
8156 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
BoomNasty
United States265 Posts
On December 03 2011 19:42 zeru wrote: Yes, look at 4 head to head games instead of 500 or 200 total games :p you really arent making sense now... you try to use team battles as support for your case... and when i say they are 2-2 you agree so your point is null... makes no sense | ||
|
zeru
8156 Posts
| ||
|
Ventris
Germany1226 Posts
| ||
|
BoomNasty
United States265 Posts
On December 03 2011 19:45 zeru wrote: I used overall statistics to show how much better mouz is overall. Using 4 head to head games as sample size is beyond silly. again go look at one my earlier posts where i go through EG having around 8 major tournament accomplishes in the past year while mouz has 1 in the past year... this of course referring to non team leagues | ||
|
Terminal
United Kingdom2109 Posts
| ||
|
zeru
8156 Posts
| ||
|
BoomNasty
United States265 Posts
On December 03 2011 19:50 zeru wrote: Again, i used the word overall. Not past year. One of mouz 1.6 players died in a car accident this(?) year. this is a sc2 forum, go take your CS stuff elsewhere. and for sc2 the last year is pretty much overall | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
DeadBull
421 Posts
But i think that mouz has a way better overall team | ||
|
KinQuh
Finland810 Posts
| ||
dfs
Russian Federation4050 Posts
On December 03 2011 19:55 DeadBull wrote: EG has more money ---> better players. But i think that mouz has a way better overall team More money means better players? Thats so wrong... This is not NBA man. | ||
| ||
