EPTGSTL May Teams - no IM - Page 28
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Fawkes
Canada1935 Posts
| ||
|
Dissonance23
United States259 Posts
| ||
|
_Nova_
United States167 Posts
On May 11 2011 03:58 Fawkes wrote: Slayers looks like they might have an easy time to the finals again! Again..? They won last time, but getting there was not easy. Lol. oGs, then Startale, then IM. They had it harder than ANY other team, they definitely deserved that win. | ||
|
Seide
United States831 Posts
On May 11 2011 03:59 Dissonance23 wrote: Not even going to bother watching without IM in it. Honestly, points from past GSTLs should be awarded based on season. Overreacting much lol? Theres plenty of good teams and players even without IM. Though IM instead of fOu would make the top bracket more interesting on paper. | ||
Cyanocyst
2222 Posts
On May 11 2011 04:01 _Nova_ wrote: Again..? They won last time, but getting there was not easy. Lol. oGs, then Startale, then IM. They had it harder than ANY other team, they definitely deserved that win. I think he meant, that they have a good chance of going to the finals once again. He wasn't commenting on the difficulty of winning the last GSTL. Just that they the have an easy path this time around. As they should being the reigning seeded champions. | ||
|
Maskedsatyr
Singapore1245 Posts
On May 11 2011 03:59 Dissonance23 wrote: Not even going to bother watching without IM in it. Honestly, points from past GSTLs should be awarded based on season. Lets not overreact here. GSTL will still be more awesome than most other tourneys. | ||
|
SwirlQ
United States148 Posts
| ||
|
MetalLobster
Canada532 Posts
GSTL point system should reward teams by performance per season just like GSL, not by amount of members. I think I will pass on this GSTL and wait for the super tournament. | ||
|
sVnteen
Germany2238 Posts
On May 11 2011 03:49 Seide wrote: Yeah I agree, it is legit. It definately was not an easy tourney, but you will always find those who say otherwise. yeah i totally agree with this as well | ||
|
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
A basketball analogy would be, would you let the Lakers/Celtics/Knicks play in the playoffs even if they're not in the top 8 of their conference? You can argue that IM is one of the best teams, I would agree, but there's no definitive metric to prove that. As well, past performance isn't indicative of future performance (sure, Nestea and MVP are past GSL winners, but so is FruitDealer - one's performance at any time can fluctuate quite significantly). The only metric available is the one GOM set out - # of Code A/S players. Sure, it is flawed, but it is the methodology they are using. Maybe GOM needs to revise its scoring method, but personally I think it's okay - based on results IM will be in next time and can dominate once again =) | ||
|
alch
Canada17 Posts
| ||
|
Cyanocyst
2222 Posts
On May 11 2011 03:59 Dissonance23 wrote: Not even going to bother watching without IM in it. Honestly, points from past GSTLs should be awarded based on season. I agree, its not Nearly as exciting without IM in it for me. They were the only team that showed confidence in their Zerg players. Not to mention i think, Nestea and Losira are the top 2 Zergs in the world. Im surprised they would hold GSTL before Code A qualifiers, because Technically Fou doesn't have Choya or Leenock in code A currently. Meaning their rating is inflated, or rather ambiguous. I hope Min, Yughio, Revival, Coca, Kyrix, Zenio, FruitDealer, Violet and DRG get sufficient playing time. If not its gonna be such a TvP TvT or PvP fest. | ||
|
Twistacles
Canada1327 Posts
We need lighter colors. | ||
|
rysecake
United States2632 Posts
On May 11 2011 02:59 Ciel wrote: I dont like IMMvp anyway so I glad I see him less but its unfortunate that top zergs like Losira and Nestea lost their chances to play cuz of him. whatanab Yes so unfortunate. Except the last time Nestea played Mvp, he got his ass kicked 3-1. But please continue your lecture about why it's all mvp's fault. | ||
|
fer
Canada375 Posts
On May 10 2011 14:16 ReachTheSky wrote: Top teams get decided by results. Surely you can't be considered a top team if you don't have the current results to back it up. The other teams that are ahead of IM have proven, by showing results, that they are indeed a top team. I do agree that IM is a very good team, but if they aren't proving it consistantly then where is the credibility? You nailed it. I whole heartedly agree with you; 100%. I support GOMtv completely disregarding their previous tournament placements to rank a team, as that would be clearly the most illogical thing one could think of. | ||
|
Tyrr
United States216 Posts
| ||
|
Torumfroll
290 Posts
IM is a strong team with more depth than people are giving them credit for. Hopefully Genius and Keen have some epic ceremonies to make up for the lack of IM in the league. | ||
|
xhkz
Canada34 Posts
| ||
|
Dissonance23
United States259 Posts
On May 11 2011 04:04 Seide wrote: Overreacting much lol? Theres plenty of good teams and players even without IM. Though IM instead of fOu would make the top bracket more interesting on paper. It's my NesTea and Losira fanboyism  And the IM team in whole I guess. | ||
|
Geegeez
Canada226 Posts
On May 11 2011 04:24 Torumfroll wrote: Hopefully Genius and Keen have some epic ceremonies to make up for the lack of IM in the league. Here's what MVPKeen thinks of the lack of IM: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/rynIH.gif) | ||
| ||
