• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:11
CEST 09:11
KST 16:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Earn Rewards for Every Prediction in the Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 625 users

[D] What SC2 is missing? - Page 58

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 56 57 58 59 60 70 Next
By.Fantasy
Profile Joined February 2011
Thailand123 Posts
April 19 2011 05:08 GMT
#1141
On April 19 2011 07:39 Nazza wrote:
3) BW mechanics are worse, thus SC2 is more fun

I'm not going to lie. SC2 mechanics are easier. But the OP makes arguments besides mechanics. Personally I think the effect SC2 mechanics have on the game are minimal, aside from acceleration/deceleration of certain units, and unit pathing.
.


Better mechanics = more fun?I play both and honestly most of the time I laugh and have more fun and laughs when playing BW.... Lol remember those stupid goons can't go up the ramp and they keep getting bugged? Soo Funny hahaha! then you lose after that? lolz It was so funny xD

SC2 has better mechanics sure but I never enjoyed forcefielding(1FFFFFFFF) and microing my units like in BW....I like what BW has to do when your in battle.. from splitting zealot storming stasising defusing mines... Some people might find stupid AI frustrating because all they care about is winning. But I have fun while playing BW...

In SC2 I have more fun people who waste their time insulting me and spamming me rather than actually playing it...

P.S I only recently started playing BW and SC2.... And I only watched like 3 VODS....
My english is not very good.
andrewwiggin
Profile Joined September 2010
Australia435 Posts
April 19 2011 05:12 GMT
#1142
sc2 is a different game. I never played BW competitively before (was too young to care), but I can tell you now I love SC2.

all you people comparing BW to SC2 are comparing two DIFFERENT games. That's where your problem lies.

You're the older person who has nostalgia about an older time, and wants to satisfy that nostalgia by changing what exists now.

But as suprising as this may be... ALOT OF PEOPLE LOVE SC2 AS IT IS NOW!

Me included. =)

Techno
Profile Joined June 2010
1900 Posts
April 19 2011 05:12 GMT
#1143
Perfectly played 200/200 Terran play won't be achieved for many years. It will be a thing of beauty.
Hell, its awesome to LOSE to nukes!
Elefanto
Profile Joined May 2010
Switzerland3584 Posts
April 19 2011 05:19 GMT
#1144
On April 19 2011 14:12 andrewwiggin wrote:
sc2 is a different game. I never played BW competitively before (was too young to care), but I can tell you now I love SC2.

all you people comparing BW to SC2 are comparing two DIFFERENT games. That's where your problem lies.

You're the older person who has nostalgia about an older time, and wants to satisfy that nostalgia by changing what exists now.

But as suprising as this may be... ALOT OF PEOPLE LOVE SC2 AS IT IS NOW!

Me included. =)



You don't get it at all.
People with a BW background don't want a new bw, they have bw with a thriving korean scene.

They want to help sc2 with their knowledge and insight in what made bw what it is today.
The games are different, but the basic fundamentals are the same.

And those experienced people (op) can see, that the game has great potential, but through his past he knows how the already good game can become EVEN better.
wat
Resolve
Profile Joined August 2010
Singapore679 Posts
April 19 2011 05:20 GMT
#1145
I started watching SC2 back in beta when I randomly came across Husky & HD. Eventually I found teamliquid and after SC2 was released I followed mostly the big tournaments and stopped watching H&H. While following the growing SC2 scene, I also popped by the BW section in TL and started watching BW VODS / Streams. It took a while to get used to the graphics and it was (and still is) hard to understand what was going on in the game. I started reading up on the BW matchups to try to improve my viewing experience. It is amazing. BW is. I cannot claim to be a gosu at understanding the game (because I don't even play it lol), but seeing all the cute things the players do to inch themselves to a small advantage is exciting. The difficulty of executing all these cute micro while macroing thanks to the retarded UI of BW makes it all the more impressive, but that's not the main point. In fact, I feel that the improvement in the SC2 UI is great. Disregarding the terrible UI, the flow of the game is still much more interesting to watch.

SC2 feels to me, a more shallow game than BW. Whether this is good or not for the spectators is arguable. It's easier for casual players to come into the scene, because of the fancy graphics and relatively simple state of the game. But after a certain point, something seems to be missing in some of the matchups if you knew what brood war can offer. SC2 is an amazing game, but BW is on another class of its own. Why should we settle for something less, when we have already seen what can be achieved in the previous game?

I still mostly watch SC2, because BW is harder to follow (I can't speak korean T_T). But I urge those who are satisfied with the current SC2 to try to watch and understand the BW games, because that may change your entire opinion on this issue. BW is only boring to watch if you don't have a clue on what's happening in the game. Please go past that step before criticising any "nostalgic BW fanboys", because they have extremely valid points to make.

Recommended Games / Threads
+ Show Spoiler +
Check these threads for games :
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=197538
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=178052
========================================


========================================


By.Fantasy
Profile Joined February 2011
Thailand123 Posts
April 19 2011 05:23 GMT
#1146
On April 19 2011 14:12 andrewwiggin wrote:
sc2 is a different game. I never played BW competitively before (was too young to care), but I can tell you now I love SC2.

all you people comparing BW to SC2 are comparing two DIFFERENT games. That's where your problem lies.

You're the older person who has nostalgia about an older time, and wants to satisfy that nostalgia by changing what exists now.

But as suprising as this may be... ALOT OF PEOPLE LOVE SC2 AS IT IS NOW!

Me included. =)



This post is not about SC2 to being more BW its more of SC2 trying to learn what BW has done.

I only started recently playing Starcraft 2 and BW.(I played more FPS than RTS) You can call that nostalgia if you like. But I think everyone is missing the point of this thread. If you ever think about it BW is the best game you can compare SC2 with... Starcraft 2 has its charms of its own and I love it... I love BW too why can't we just all be friends?
My english is not very good.
Lumire
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States607 Posts
April 19 2011 05:30 GMT
#1147
On April 19 2011 14:20 Resolve wrote:
SC2 feels to me, a more shallow game than BW. Whether this is good or not for the spectators is arguable. It's easier for casual players to come into the scene, because of the fancy graphics and relatively simple state of the game. But after a certain point, something seems to be missing in some of the matchups if you knew what brood war can offer. SC2 is an amazing game, but BW is on another class of its own. Why should we settle for something less, when we have already seen what can be achieved in the previous game?

I still mostly watch SC2, because BW is harder to follow (I can't speak korean T_T). But I urge those who are satisfied with the current SC2 to try to watch and understand the BW games, because that may change your entire opinion on this issue. BW is only boring to watch if you don't have a clue on what's happening in the game. Please go past that step before criticising any "nostalgic BW fanboys", because they have extremely valid points to make.


I agree 100%, I came to TL during beta after plugging from HD and Husky and played SC2 exclusively
except during beta downtime which i played BW for like 2 weeks, but about 3 months ago i started poking in BW threads and eventually decided to watch a few vods/streams and one thing led to another and quit SC2 all together for BW about 2 and a half months ago and haven't touched it since, and doubt i ever will.

I encourage everyone to at some point just ignore SC2 exists for a week and try BW instead, its really fun even just losing over and over starting out and theres a ton of helpfull people in OP Teamliquid on iccup.
|| o.o
GhostBladE
Profile Joined March 2011
United States6 Posts
April 19 2011 06:04 GMT
#1148
It's good to compare the two and see that yeah maybe Blizzard can do a little better balancing and fix some things to the game, but you also can't compare a 9 month old game with a 12 year old game that had years to grow and be balanced and all the interesting things you can do, and we haven't even gotten into the first expansion yet for sc2 so there is still so much more room to grow.
Bluetea
Profile Joined August 2010
United States185 Posts
April 19 2011 06:53 GMT
#1149
Your first two pictures are unfair for analysis purposes. Of course there are more "things" going on in the BW picture: there are more units involved. Add HTs and a raven to the top picture and then there are more "things" going on in the SC2 picture.

Of course I agree that BW required more micro and the battles were more dynamic, but why flaw your argument with imbalanced pictures?
All these bitches is my sons.
osten
Profile Joined March 2008
Sweden316 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 07:07:25
April 19 2011 07:06 GMT
#1150
But it's unfair. Some people seem to have rational capability to identify the difference between a sequel and a remake, but also to ignore that basis, and then simply compare the game only to BW, without comparing it to other games too. There is no reason not to compare it just as much to WC3 and see what we can get from that game to improve SC2. The thread talks about what SC2 is missing.

When, because you certainly can, you compare it to BW, don't just make irregular statements about the quality, such as A was so good in BW but is not in SC2? What can be in both games, except maybe a concept? Nothing. If you met someone saying "WC3 had heroes, SC2 should do that too", you would rage, but you are in essence doing the exact same thing. Just because you are pulling gold nuggets from a perfect game, dosen't mean you can impose on the quality of a new game, in it's infant stages.

Your point would be exactly as legitimate as using a C&C concept, i.e. the spy, and then pull down an essay about why C&C is so awesome, where SC2 is not. Don't do that with any game as base. Just be smarter people.
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
April 19 2011 07:38 GMT
#1151
People who are saying that oldschoolers just want a BW 2.0 completely miss the point. Hell, I didn't even play BW competitively, just some games here and there and watch. And still I completely get what they mean.

You could introduce completely different units in SC2, you don't have to re-introduce lurkers, vultures, etc. - obvious things being obvious. But this doesn't change the fact that the current setup of units is far too less demanding. The only unit that REALLY changes from so-so to awsome with enough skill envolved are blink stalkers. Introducing blink stalkers was brilliant in my opinion, there are still so many unexplored ways to play with them. Just think about it that way: we don't need "more BW-units" but we need more units like the blink stalker. Borderline crappy when a-moved, but incredible in the hands of someone who has mastered the blink skills.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4838 Posts
April 19 2011 08:00 GMT
#1152
On April 19 2011 16:38 sleepingdog wrote:
The only unit that REALLY changes from so-so to awsome with enough skill envolved are blink stalkers. Introducing blink stalkers was brilliant in my opinion, there are still so many unexplored ways to play with them. Just think about it that way: we don't need "more BW-units" but we need more units like the blink stalker. Borderline crappy when a-moved, but incredible in the hands of someone who has mastered the blink skills.

The blink Stalker is awesome, but I still resent the elimination of Dragoon micro. Perhaps some other unit could pick up the Dragoon's brilliant combination of clumsy and nimble?
My strategy is to fork people.
Chaosvuistje
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands2581 Posts
April 19 2011 08:14 GMT
#1153
On April 19 2011 17:00 Severedevil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2011 16:38 sleepingdog wrote:
The only unit that REALLY changes from so-so to awsome with enough skill envolved are blink stalkers. Introducing blink stalkers was brilliant in my opinion, there are still so many unexplored ways to play with them. Just think about it that way: we don't need "more BW-units" but we need more units like the blink stalker. Borderline crappy when a-moved, but incredible in the hands of someone who has mastered the blink skills.

The blink Stalker is awesome, but I still resent the elimination of Dragoon micro. Perhaps some other unit could pick up the Dragoon's brilliant combination of clumsy and nimble?

The ultralisk fills the role of mentally challenged and fast pretty well. Have you ever tried getting an ultralisk to the front of your force? Its maddening!
Ribbon
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5278 Posts
April 19 2011 09:10 GMT
#1154
On April 19 2011 14:23 By.Fantasy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2011 14:12 andrewwiggin wrote:
sc2 is a different game. I never played BW competitively before (was too young to care), but I can tell you now I love SC2.

all you people comparing BW to SC2 are comparing two DIFFERENT games. That's where your problem lies.

You're the older person who has nostalgia about an older time, and wants to satisfy that nostalgia by changing what exists now.

But as suprising as this may be... ALOT OF PEOPLE LOVE SC2 AS IT IS NOW!

Me included. =)



This post is not about SC2 to being more BW its more of SC2 trying to learn what BW has done.


"We're not saying it should be like Brood War, just that it should have all the elements of Brood War we liked".

There's a lot of things Brood War does well that SC2 doesn't do. That's not an accident.

I don't want SC2 to be as good as Brood War. Brood War is as good as Brood War, and if SC2 doesn't break away from the Brood War formula, on purpose, it'll never be anything but a pale imitation.

In order for SC2 to succeed, it has to do something new. "It's like X, but better" has never been a successful formula. It never will be. It never can be. I made a Capcom joke earlier. How many times have they tried to recapture the magic of Mega Man 2? They've made some pretty good games in the attempt, but they never really beat it. Mega Man 3 was "Mega Man 2, but better". And yet...it kind of wasn't as good. Mega Man 4? Enh. Mega Man 5. 6. 7. 8 was actually kind of bad. Even 9 and 10, which got to use the nostalgia factor, never quite made it to that level.

Capcom tried making a sequel then that broke the formula pretty hard. It was "dumbed down for the masses" with easier levels that didn't require pixel perfect jumps. Single-use E-tanks were replaced with permanent upgrades that collected spare energy for later, another dumbing down of the game for the masses who couldn't handle the more mechanically challenging Mega Man 2. It was faster, with characters flying all over the screen during boss fights. Instead of getting upgrades after beating levels, you had to hunt them down in the levels. You had to backtrack, something every previous Mega Man game made a point of avoiding. On top of that, the story was a jarring shift in tone with only a passing allusion to the existence of anything that game before.

And yet, somehow, Mega Man X is considered one of the best games on the SNES, which spun off into a bunch of attempts to recapture the magic by making Mega Man X but better.

Now, obviously, there are some flaws in that comparison (Mega Man isn't even multiplayer, let alone an e-sport!), but I'd much rather a Starcraft 2 that was like Mega Man X, a game that had success going in a different direction, and is comparable to the classic game it's based on, but different enough that people can prefer one or the other for different reasons.

I don't want SC2 to end up like Mega Man 3: A game that was pretty good, but ultimately remembered as "That game that wasn't quite as good as the classic".

I don't want a Starcraft 2 that's just a rehash of ground Brood War trod better. I want one that's successful doing it's own thing, kind of similar to BW but notably different. Ten years from now, I want there to still be threads on Team Liquid talking about how SC2 is awful, while people like me cite the incredibly epic Stargirl vs Miniwheat finals of GSL XXXVI as examples of why SC2 is better than BW and there's a big epic 50 page flamewar that ends in everyone getting banned.

And that'll only happen if the games are different enough that one's not considered a better version of the other.
osten
Profile Joined March 2008
Sweden316 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 09:46:31
April 19 2011 09:44 GMT
#1155
Well I agree but.... You don't understand how good Megaman 9 and 10 is. Not at all. You used that analogy quite errenous. If Blizzard did a scbw remake in that same way, we would have an aaaawesome game. Not SC2, but an awesome game nontheless.
Nazza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia1654 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 10:56:06
April 19 2011 10:46 GMT
#1156
On April 19 2011 14:08 By.Fantasy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2011 07:39 Nazza wrote:
3) BW mechanics are worse, thus SC2 is more fun

I'm not going to lie. SC2 mechanics are easier. But the OP makes arguments besides mechanics. Personally I think the effect SC2 mechanics have on the game are minimal, aside from acceleration/deceleration of certain units, and unit pathing.
.


Better mechanics = more fun?I play both and honestly most of the time I laugh and have more fun and laughs when playing BW.... Lol remember those stupid goons can't go up the ramp and they keep getting bugged? Soo Funny hahaha! then you lose after that? lolz It was so funny xD

SC2 has better mechanics sure but I never enjoyed forcefielding(1FFFFFFFF) and microing my units like in BW....I like what BW has to do when your in battle.. from splitting zealot storming stasising defusing mines... Some people might find stupid AI frustrating because all they care about is winning. But I have fun while playing BW...

In SC2 I have more fun people who waste their time insulting me and spamming me rather than actually playing it...

P.S I only recently started playing BW and SC2.... And I only watched like 3 VODS....

i'm saying that its false, if you actually read the statement below.

Also, personally i'm not saying that SC2 should be exactly like BW. some units in BW just do not fit in with modern mechanics like autocast. Defilers? A unit that has infinite mana that can one-shot everything and nullify all damage. Yeah that's really balanced with smartcast. Scouts? Other useless units/abilities? No thanks.
No one ever remembers second place, eh? eh? GIVE ME COMMAND
Kirigix
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium15 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-19 11:03:43
April 19 2011 11:02 GMT
#1157
Let me ask a question: Isnt it a bit hippocryting to say, that "we dont want sc2 to change into BW but learn from it" This basicly means, that sc2 in your opinion, should take alot things from BW and thus, becoming BW itself with exception of few units and better graphics. But yet, you are trying hard to claim that you are not wanting sc2 to become BW.

I know, and you know it too; you want sc2 to transform into BW, no matter how you are trying to disguise your intentions. I am not the one who gets fooled here.
Resolve
Profile Joined August 2010
Singapore679 Posts
April 19 2011 11:11 GMT
#1158
On April 19 2011 20:02 Kirigix wrote:
Let me ask a question: Isnt it a bit hippocryting to say, that "we dont want sc2 to change into BW but learn from it" This basicly means, that sc2 in your opinion, should take alot things from BW and thus, becoming BW itself with exception of few units and better graphics. But yet, you are trying hard to claim that you are not wanting sc2 to become BW.

I know, and you know it too; you want sc2 to transform into BW, no matter how you are trying to disguise your intentions. I am not the one who gets fooled here.

So, what's your point? That none of the merits of BW should be even considered in its sequel? Hm :|
Asunanas
Profile Joined April 2011
53 Posts
April 19 2011 11:12 GMT
#1159
Thanks for the great post.
However, the thing is that BW has been out for so long that people have been easily been able to get so good. If you're asking for a nerf/buff to units, then it'll change the entire game again.

I think one fundamental thing you've forgot to think about is what the real purpose of Starcraft 2 was for. Starcraft 2 was for the entire audience of BW to look foward to new gameplay, new units, etc.
Admittedly, Starcraft 2 is still flawed and there are many wrong mechanics within the game. But, think about how long Blizzard spent polishing their first game. Starcraft 2 won't be the game that we all want right away, that's why we have patches every now and then, to change the game to make is better for everyone.

Also, Starcraft 2 wasn't released soley for e-sports, SC2 was released for entertainment purposes, so is WoW, all game are released to entertain the audience of whoever buys them.

I'll agree with most of your post, SC2 is a very linear game, and compared to SC1, you don't have to be as good to play as a popular professional. But still, let it develop, and I'm sure that we'll all be screaming at how amazing it is.
Seriously though, how long has this game been released? Starcraft 2 is probably one of the main reasons why e-sports is becoming so exponentially popular today. think about it, it's been released for so little time and yet so many tournaments have come and gone and are still on their way.

I'm sure that many more will come with Starcraft 2, compared to BW, it's still a very young game.
Kirigix
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium15 Posts
April 19 2011 11:23 GMT
#1160
On April 19 2011 20:11 Resolve wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 19 2011 20:02 Kirigix wrote:
Let me ask a question: Isnt it a bit hippocryting to say, that "we dont want sc2 to change into BW but learn from it" This basicly means, that sc2 in your opinion, should take alot things from BW and thus, becoming BW itself with exception of few units and better graphics. But yet, you are trying hard to claim that you are not wanting sc2 to become BW.

I know, and you know it too; you want sc2 to transform into BW, no matter how you are trying to disguise your intentions. I am not the one who gets fooled here.

So, what's your point? That none of the merits of BW should be even considered in its sequel? Hm :|

Point is, that here is people who try very hard to claim that they dont want sc2 to become BW like one guys besides be mentioned. But they are wrong, despite their disguised arguments, they do want SC2 to become BW.
Prev 1 56 57 58 59 60 70 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 49m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JimRising 638
WinterStarcraft570
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 502
TY 451
actioN 216
PianO 138
Noble 127
sSak 69
Yoon 45
yabsab 16
Sacsri 16
Dota 2
XaKoH 389
ODPixel268
Fuzer 17
XcaliburYe12
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K334
Other Games
summit1g8353
shahzam1165
monkeys_forever243
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick35537
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH366
• Hupsaiya 64
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2103
League of Legends
• Lourlo1608
• Stunt451
• HappyZerGling88
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
2h 49m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
8h 49m
WardiTV European League
8h 49m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
16h 49m
RSL Revival
1d 2h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 5h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.