Official Fantasy NASL Thread - Page 8

On April 20 2011 23:52 Snaphoo wrote:
My GSL fantasy team is also not updating... have the site creators given up on their project, or is this a mistake?

On April 21 2011 05:03 Matk41 wrote:


First of all, please post in the Fantasy GSL thread for matters concerning Fantasy GSL teams.

Secondly, which team is yours? I can check to see if things are updating properly. Also keep in mind that GSL updates, at this time, will not be done live and may be delayed as all of us who run the site are in university and are writing finals right now.

On April 21 2011 05:50 udgnim wrote:


the TL thread link on the fantasy GSL page

http://fantasystarcraft.net/gsl_6

links to the Fantasy NASL thread

On April 21 2011 05:03 Matk41 wrote:


First of all, please post in the Fantasy GSL thread for matters concerning Fantasy GSL teams.

Secondly, which team is yours? I can check to see if things are updating properly. Also keep in mind that GSL updates, at this time, will not be done live and may be delayed as all of us who run the site are in university and are writing finals right now.

On April 21 2011 07:04 azn_dude1 wrote:
I feel like the point system is a little too imbalanced. Since you get triple the points for winning than for losing, it's hard to justify why you would want to spend that many points for the higher players. If you look at the leaderboards, the people have many cheap players who might not be the best, but since they have so many, the player's wins give a lot of points while losses barely affect their score.

You can look at it as if you have two players in the same match, that's a guaranteed 4 points, possibly 6. The more times that occurs, the more points you'll get regardless. Hence, the more players you have, the more points you'll earn, regardless of how badly they do, since you're guaranteed points if they play and win just one.

On April 26 2011 00:15 Hammurabio wrote:
Scoring errors:
Slush won both of his matches 2-1. He should be at 10 points, not 11.
Strelok won both of his matches, but only has 6 points. Zero points for a walkover win?
Mana should be at 4 points, not 6. His matches were 2-0 & 0-2.

I only checked my team, not all the players.

On April 26 2011 03:08 throttled wrote:


Sheth beat Artosis 2-0. 11 is the correct amount.

Points are awarded for map wins, not match wins. Walkover = no maps played.

You're correct with Mana, 4 points total, 2-2 on maps.

On April 26 2011 03:08 throttled wrote:
Points are awarded for map wins, not match wins. Walkover = no maps played.

On April 21 2011 07:04 azn_dude1 wrote:
I feel like the point system is a little too imbalanced. Since you get triple the points for winning than for losing, it's hard to justify why you would want to spend that many points for the higher players. If you look at the leaderboards, the people have many cheap players who might not be the best, but since they have so many, the player's wins give a lot of points while losses barely affect their score.

You can look at it as if you have two players in the same match, that's a guaranteed 4 points, possibly 6. The more times that occurs, the more points you'll get regardless. Hence, the more players you have, the more points you'll earn, regardless of how badly they do, since you're guaranteed points if they play and win just one.

On April 26 2011 03:58 Hammurabio wrote:


My fault, I did not read the rules fully. But now you have a bunch more scoring errors on the walkover matches.

TT1 vs QXC - TT1 should be -2 instead of 4. QXC should be -2 instead of -4.

Brat_OK vs MC - Brat_OK should be 1 instead of 8.

July vs White_Ra - July should be -2 instead of 4. White_Ra should be 5 instead of 3.

On April 26 2011 03:32 Insanious wrote:

Slush =/= Sheth...

Slush went 2-1 and 2-1 = 10 points
Sheth went 2-0 and 2-1 = 11 points

On April 26 2011 08:01 Insanious wrote:
wrong...