EPTBoxer's Interview after the Qualifiers - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Cham
797 Posts
| ||
|
lukash
Slovakia6 Posts
I totally agree... This kind of thinking doesnt fit wit pro. He said, he will change race, deppending on patch... Currently, terran is for him most advantageous. | ||
|
Barett
Canada454 Posts
| ||
|
Raiznhell
Canada786 Posts
On October 11 2010 07:43 roborious wrote: What does this say about the legions of bronzers and even1k-1.5k diamond players (including most of the people on this forums). If boxer chose zerg and made a statement saying he was glad zerg was getting a buff, there would be no one saying "boxer isnt as good as other zergs right now. i dont think he understands sc2 enough to be able to identify imbalance" not to mention boxer has played well over 1k games when adding up his two accounts and is in the top 100 in the world right now on one of those accounts and in the korean top 200 with both :/ or at least was on that last bit. | ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
ChewbroCColi
Denmark108 Posts
Would be so epic lol :D:D:D | ||
|
Trion
Canada291 Posts
On October 11 2010 08:51 Jyvblamo wrote: I'm seeing a lot of blasphemers in this here thread. Harumph. Such as?... | ||
|
mrdx
Vietnam1555 Posts
Such as a guy above who said "i dont think he understands sc2 enough to be able to identify imbalance" - while he's probably one of the top 100 players who understand SC2 best right now. Not to mention that he was one of the best, if not the best strategy innovator / thinker / inspirer in competitive gaming that are playing SC2. Geez, I understand there are a lot of new comers on TL nowadays who are just eager to post their opinions about everything but can we have sign or something that says before you say something about certain topics/players, you must learn BW history a little first. | ||
|
bigjenk
United States1543 Posts
On October 11 2010 10:19 mrdx wrote: Such as a guy above who said "i dont think he understands sc2 enough to be able to identify imbalance" - while he's probably one of the top 100 players who understand SC2 best right now. Not to mention that he was one of the best, if not the best strategy innovator / thinker / inspirer in competitive gaming that are playing SC2. Geez, I understand there are a lot of new comers on TL nowadays who are just eager to post their opinions about everything but can we have sign or something that says before you say something about certain topics/players, you must learn BW history a little first. This and who exactly has been playing for a really long time? The first hands on for public was last years blizzcon and beta much later, not like anyone has a long history of experience with sc2. | ||
|
Kal_rA
United States2925 Posts
i thought kespa wasnt allowing their players to participate in gsl.... great news anyways  boxer was finished in bw... his last game vs yellow was clear indicator hahaboxer fighting! | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
Gotta disagree with you there, Boxer.  | ||
|
canikizu
4860 Posts
On October 11 2010 01:47 tacrats wrote: boxer isnt as good as other terrans right now. i dont think he understands sc2 enough to be able to identify imbalance I don't know about you, but I think a player who has rts experience and played 700+ games + custom games is able to identify imbalance. Or maybe you suggest that one has to play 1000+ games to understand the balance? | ||
|
canikizu
4860 Posts
On October 10 2010 23:58 Pekkz wrote: Prolly why theres 17 terrans and 5 zerg qualified so far. Could all be probability, or it could be imbalances. Blizzard and most progamers seem to think zerg still needs some buffs, and we will see after that comes out if they where right or wrong. Because there're 17000 T players and 5000 Z players participated? It'd be imba if there're 12 T and 12 Z qualify instead of 17 and 5. | ||
|
TymerA
Netherlands759 Posts
| ||
|
danbel1005
United States1319 Posts
 TLAF-Liquid`BoxeR plz? | ||
|
TymerA
Netherlands759 Posts
| ||
|
silentreality
Korea (South)222 Posts
A : 매번 테란을 하향을 하고 있어서 약간 불만이 있다. 블리자드에서 사용자 수나 팀플레이에 맞춰서 패치하는 경향이 있다. 또 저그가 우승했는데 저그 상향은 약간 이해가 안가는 부분이다. A: I am slightly displeased with the multiple Terran nerfs (including recent ones). Blizzard has tendency to balance games for team games and games with multiple players (I think implying FFA). Also Zerg has won recently so I don't understand why Zerg is receiving a buff. Thanks for the translations, I used to do translations part time 3-4 years ago till work pretty much consumed my soul. Anywho, I'd like to make a slight correction to the bolded text above, it should read, IMO, as follows: "Blizzard has a tendency to balance the game looking at the number of players for each race (사용자 수) or around team matches (팀플레이)." Anyway let's give thanks to translations when they're done, it's a thankless job  | ||
|
kojinshugi
Estonia2559 Posts
| ||
|
kojinshugi
Estonia2559 Posts
On October 11 2010 15:27 silentreality wrote: "Blizzard has a tendency to balance the game looking at the number of players for each race (사용자 수) or around team matches (팀플레이)." This makes a lot more sense. Not least of all because it's true. | ||
|
ooni
Australia1498 Posts
On October 11 2010 15:27 silentreality wrote: Q : 테란에 만족하는지? A : 매번 테란을 하향을 하고 있어서 약간 불만이 있다. 블리자드에서 사용자 수나 팀플레이에 맞춰서 패치하는 경향이 있다. 또 저그가 우승했는데 저그 상향은 약간 이해가 안가는 부분이다. A: I am slightly displeased with the multiple Terran nerfs (including recent ones). Blizzard has tendency to balance games for team games and games with multiple players (I think implying FFA). Also Zerg has won recently so I don't understand why Zerg is receiving a buff. Thanks for the translations, I used to do translations part time 3-4 years ago till work pretty much consumed my soul. Anywho, I'd like to make a slight correction to the bolded text above, it should read, IMO, as follows: "Blizzard has a tendency to balance the game looking at the number of players for each race (사용자 수) or around team matches (팀플레이)." Anyway let's give thanks to translations when they're done, it's a thankless job ha thx, think I overlooked that, if you see the time, it was around 3 am Aus when I translated it. I was hazy by the end of the interview. EDITed, although it just says number of players (for each race) would be the implied part. | ||
| ||
