Cross Realm Conundrum - Page 19
Forum Index > SC2 General |
ocho
United States172 Posts
| ||
Atticus.axl
United States456 Posts
Blizzard, I want chat rooms, and i agree with the OP. | ||
marconi
Croatia220 Posts
![]() | ||
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
![]()
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
| ||
eazo
United States530 Posts
| ||
Scrubbo
Greece7 Posts
I'm incredibly disappointed by the direction that Blizzard is heading | ||
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
| ||
NastyMarine
United States1252 Posts
| ||
uNiGNoRe
Germany1115 Posts
I'm about that far |---| away from not buying the game I've waited so many years for. | ||
Fish_Baguettes
Australia589 Posts
| ||
Lollersauce
United States357 Posts
![]() | ||
DoX.)
Singapore6164 Posts
| ||
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:42 uNiGNoRe wrote: Their message is clear: "We don't want to put any effort into the new Battle.net at all. You'll have to play on private servers if you want any basic functions." I'm about that far |---| away from not buying the game I've waited so many years for. It's worse: "We don't want to put any effort into the new Battle.net and we are going to sue your ass if you mess with our intellectual property by hosting your own server." That said, /signed with the OP. | ||
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
/shit storm | ||
Plaaguu
United States406 Posts
| ||
bubblegumbo
Taiwan1296 Posts
How can something that obvious not be apparent? Asking players to spend 3x$60 just so that they can compete on either 3 realms is ridiculous. Even if the sponsors are willing to do that for their clanmates, who is going to do that for the up-and-coming player in the scene? Do they actually know the community and demography they are targeting? Just let the player pick his region of choice when he logs in. If he lags in the region he selected, obviously that is not Blizzard's fault, but the player's. | ||
Kantutan
Canada1319 Posts
/signed | ||
konadora
![]()
Singapore66071 Posts
/signed | ||
Perfect Balance
Norway131 Posts
All of these elements could be implemented with the snap of a finger. It's not because they can't, or avoid it - they WON'T. The question that remains, is why. My money is on the money. | ||
| ||