EPTOn May 22 2010 00:33 Amber[LighT] wrote:
The problem is there's more idiot newb posts that are "theorizing" something as opposed to the good players actually trying different strategies out. For every 5 or so "what's better to do? 9 Overlord or 11 Overlord?" threads there's maybe one quality discussion thread usually created by the same 4-5 people.
I don't want to hear about why mid-gold or silver players think the roach is imbalanced and discuss it for god knows how long.
Democracy fails when the majority consists of the bad players lol.
Also Beyonder, there's no way to make a forum appear invisible unless you have rights to view it? Such as the mafia forum? It would be like a VIP SC2 Discussion and strategy forum, just combine the two.
The problem is there's more idiot newb posts that are "theorizing" something as opposed to the good players actually trying different strategies out. For every 5 or so "what's better to do? 9 Overlord or 11 Overlord?" threads there's maybe one quality discussion thread usually created by the same 4-5 people.
I don't want to hear about why mid-gold or silver players think the roach is imbalanced and discuss it for god knows how long.
Democracy fails when the majority consists of the bad players lol.
Also Beyonder, there's no way to make a forum appear invisible unless you have rights to view it? Such as the mafia forum? It would be like a VIP SC2 Discussion and strategy forum, just combine the two.
Again, this is a problem solved by increased rule enforcement (they aren't supposed to be "theorizing" without lots of good replays) and making people more aware of the search function. There is no need to pile on another level of complexity to how the site works or segregate users at all.
