EPTFacebook Queens must be at least top 10 in your division to join ( don't worry play a few games and your top 10 ) Currently accepting top ten from bronze to DIAMOND!
edit: family members can join too so invite your moms
Facebook Bnet 2.0 Integration - Page 22
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
reddog1999
United States143 Posts
Facebook Queens must be at least top 10 in your division to join ( don't worry play a few games and your top 10 ) Currently accepting top ten from bronze to DIAMOND! edit: family members can join too so invite your moms | ||
|
{ToT}ColmA
Japan3260 Posts
| ||
|
ondik
Czech Republic2908 Posts
by the way, I'm REALLY interested what's the deal between blizzard and facebook with all this.. | ||
|
infecteddna
Slovenia243 Posts
| ||
|
zTz
United States476 Posts
On May 23 2010 08:29 ondik wrote: there's no way I'd ever add to facebook someone i don't know from real life. but hey, we've already got alternative spam mails, so i guess we'll have to make spam FB accounts with current worldwide facebook crazyness by the way, I'm REALLY interested what's the deal between blizzard and facebook with all this.. Yea so I'm suppose to share pictures of my family and my daughter with people on bnet who I want to game with? I guess facebook will suddenly have a surge in unactive accounts being made to play on bnet... Edit: as I slowly take my foot out of my mouth... This thread is regarding Blizzards beta friends list situation statement. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=126839 | ||
|
Tinithor
United States1552 Posts
| ||
|
JamesLame
Sweden25 Posts
| ||
|
Sosha
United States749 Posts
I like the quote from the OP: "Now I can add friends from FB to SC2, whom i've alrdy have added on SC2 anyway because if they're my friends on FB, and play SC2, chances are high that I wouldn't have waited for something like this integration to add my friends from FB". I think its dumb.. especially now considering the problems with the patch or this integration.. We could have done w/o blizz.. jeez <3 SC2 though.. just wish we'd get more time to play it before it goes down for a month, instead of getting silly patches that grants T all sorts of buffs and nerfs Protoss like whoa. | ||
|
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
| ||
|
Regulate140
Canada108 Posts
| ||
|
andeh
United States904 Posts
being greeted with Pepsi, Nike and Bank of America logos. that would be really good for the game to see have huge corporations outside of korea take an interest in sc2 actually. lifestyle sponsors are foreshadowing of making competitive games huge | ||
|
Regulate140
Canada108 Posts
| ||
|
OneBk
Sweden157 Posts
| ||
|
Bob123
Korea (North)259 Posts
Seriously; What was wrong with the BW/WC3 style battle.net? Was it really a problem with many people wanting to use the same nickname? Or that only 5 people could actually be top 5 in the ladder? To me, so far battle.net 2.0 has been more like battle.net 0.2. No chat channels; no /whisper, instead you have to add to friends list (???) which will now require giving up of personal provacy; Rediculous league/division system without purpose; And now the icing on the cake, facebook integration BLAHRG! | ||
|
No_eL
Chile1438 Posts
EMO SHIT!! | ||
|
ZomgTossRush
United States1041 Posts
The facebook integration team is different than the networking and server management team. I don't consider either aspect of SC2 to be related to each other in terms of quality. Just that one is already done and the other needs alot more work. This is more like waiting in a long line at a fast food restaurant and someone walking up to you and gives you a yo-yo. | ||
|
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
Any most of my RL friends who play SC I know about anyway, I wouldn't give a shit if my cousin's mum has a battle.net account. | ||
| ||
