| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Daxten
Germany127 Posts
since there is a discussion how much impact your screen has to the game, here are some screens i made for another forum - Screen is always centered to building / unit that is selected 16: 9 (1920x1050) + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/561/screenshotvi.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/5585/screenshot000e.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/8121/screenshot001bn.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/7532/screenshot002rn.jpg) 16:10 (1680x1050) + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/7859/screenshot003t.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/5658/screenshot005pk.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/9849/screenshot004bj.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8676/screenshot006mx.jpg) 4:3 (1024x768) + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/3231/screenshot007i.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/4535/screenshot009t.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/8625/screenshot008j.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/9085/screenshot010t.jpg) | ||
|
caution.slip
United States775 Posts
i can't even notice a difference between 16  and 16:10 thouh | ||
|
Zhek
Canada342 Posts
| ||
|
bLah.
Croatia497 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i49.tinypic.com/w7zaeo.jpg) | ||
|
Puosu
7098 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
huge ass difference :o | ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
just because this comparison doesn't seem too fair | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
Anyways, once I get my hands on that game I'll play it with maximum zoom (except for early game and important micro situations I guess). By the way, is there a way to switch between 2 zoom/direction settings? I guess not since there is no F2-4 either... | ||
|
Klockan3
Sweden2866 Posts
On February 20 2010 03:51 freelander wrote: is 1024x768 the highest 4:3 resolution? just because this comparison doesn't seem too fair Doesn't matter what resolution you play on, the aspect ratio is what matters. Otherwise everyone would be forced to buy some huge monitors.. | ||
|
bLah.
Croatia497 Posts
| ||
|
Polis
Poland1292 Posts
| ||
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
tan(FovX/2)*tan(FovY/2)=const which basically makes what you see equal for all aspect ratios. So the widescreens show more on the side, and 4:3 shows more vertically. Probably the reason for it becoming wider, but not narrower on widescreen is that the default function for creating a Perspective Projection matrix takes the angle for the Y opening and an aspect ratio. So they did something like "Perspective( 50deg , Width/Height , near , far)" | ||
|
wo0py
Netherlands922 Posts
On February 20 2010 04:13 MasterOfChaos wrote: they should have made it so tan(FovX/2)*tan(FovY/2)=const which basically makes what you see equal for all aspect ratios. So the widescreens show more on the side, and 4:3 shows more vertically. Probably the reason for it becoming wider, but not narrower on widescreen is that the default function for creating a Perspective Projection matrix takes the angle for the Y opening and an aspect ratio. So they did something like "Perspective( 50deg , Width/Height , near , far)" Haha MoC showing off his gaming programming skills! But yea, they should have a good reason to do it this way. There is actually also a quite difference between 16: 9 and 16: 10 if you ask me. | ||
|
crabapple
United States397 Posts
On February 20 2010 04:13 MasterOfChaos wrote: they should have made it so tan(FovX/2)*tan(FovY/2)=const which basically makes what you see equal for all aspect ratios. So the widescreens show more on the side, and 4:3 shows more vertically. Probably the reason for it becoming wider, but not narrower on widescreen is that the default function for creating a Perspective Projection matrix takes the angle for the Y opening and an aspect ratio. So they did something like "Perspective( 50deg , Width/Height , near , far)" definitely agree that they should keep some sort of constant area viewable, whether it is widescreen or not. thus u would choose between more vertical or more widt, instead of giving total advantage to the wide. | ||
|
NeVeR
1352 Posts
| ||
|
prototype.
Canada4215 Posts
On February 20 2010 03:58 spinesheath wrote: There is no need to go widescreen at all - widescreen allows you to see more to the left and right, while 4:3 is larger vertically. 4:3 might even be better than wide because your vision is more equally distributed. it's actually the same vertically only horizontal view is different | ||
|
caution.slip
United States775 Posts
has more width.isn't 16:19 1920x1080 (not 1980x1050) i wish there were smaller resolutions that were 16 | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On February 20 2010 04:53 prototype. wrote: it's actually the same vertically only horizontal view is different Ya I figured that out too by now. My bad. I would have assumed that they implemented it somewhere along the lines of what MoC suggested... | ||
|
Daxten
Germany127 Posts
On February 20 2010 05:03 caution.slip wrote: ah i see, yeah 16 has more width.isn't 16:19 1920x1080 (not 1980x1050) i wish there were smaller resolutions that were 16 y it's just a typo ill edit it | ||
|
Wuselmops
Germany346 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img7.abload.de/img/sc2_fov36k6.gif) | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
FEL
Patches Events
AI Arena Tournament
FEL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
IntoTheTV X SOOP
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
