EPTCoach Pop: "It is only fitting, that after I served loyally for 19 years as Tim Duncan’s assistant, that he returns the favor."
https://twitter.com/Rockets_Insider/status/1153407330870071296?s=19
Bonus
NBA Offseason 2019 - Page 10
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Twinkle Toes
United States3605 Posts
Coach Pop: "It is only fitting, that after I served loyally for 19 years as Tim Duncan’s assistant, that he returns the favor." https://twitter.com/Rockets_Insider/status/1153407330870071296?s=19 Bonus | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16769 Posts
On July 19 2019 01:30 ZenithM wrote: In general I don't like arguments that go "Bench player A has better +/- than Starter B, so Starter B should be benched". It's something JJR says quite a lot, even if he presents it in more nuanced ways. The Satoransky > John Wall thing remains a classic to me :D. Anyway, we all know the Raptors bench mob was historically good 2 years ago. But low-minute bench players play mostly vs other bench players (vanilla +/- is basically worthless if you want to compare them to starters), and see very few occurrences of play in a starters vs starters setup, so things like RPM are not that reliable either. In the playoffs, Derozan's lack of a 3 pointer messes up spacing on offense badly. In the playoffs, the offensive rating for the Raptors was a lot worse with Derozan on the floor. In 2017 it was 102/112. in 2018 it was 109/123. This year the Spurs offense was as productive with Derozan as they were without him. Offense is supposed to be the strength of Derozan's game. He is a poor defender. In a good system that makes up for his flaws he CAN BE average as a defender. A year ago I thought getting rid of Derozan was a good move. After looking into it a bit more deeply I'd say getting rid of Derozan was a great move. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On July 25 2019 02:15 IgnE wrote: what would your proposed solution be? i don’t really see why players shouldn’t be able to move around Lowe is making the essential apologist's argument. He lists significant ramifications and then says "it's no big deal" Players can move around. They've been doing it for decades. I agree with JimmiC that raising the max or even removing it all together would be a solution. It's interesting that so few of the recent moves are motivated by money. You don't see people saying "they aren't paying me enough." I like that dynamic a lot more. We could also ramp up the Bird Rights angle with bigger salaries. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On July 25 2019 02:15 IgnE wrote: what would your proposed solution be? i don’t really see why players shouldn’t be able to move around Players moving around is, IMO, bad for the league, or at the very least not good for it. I understand that people get a lot of traffic about player movement, but that doesn't make the league money. They don't own the information about player movement. They don't own every website that speculates about where Lebron is going in 2021. The only things that reliably make the NBA money are ratings (weak evidence that player movement hurts this), gate (decent evidence movement hurts this), and apparel (no evidence either way). My solution would be a combo with jimmy's. 1. Remove the max, 2. Remove the ability for the "last year option". A 5 year contract isn't 4+1, its just 5. This would apply to teams and players so it actually could get through the CBA, and I think its a good plan. Not that players won't just sign shorter contracts (they might), but if they do they actually face down injury risk instead of having a 1 year security blanket at the end of every contract. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16769 Posts
The TV rights fees for these teams are not real. they are theoretical amounts that these corporations pay themselves. These umbrella corps shuffle the money around to gain the best net tax advantage for the entire corporation not just for the NBA team. | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
the players wouldnt want it as 95% of the players would never see that kind of money anyways and would instead lose money. the owners wouldnt want it as what happens when a guy u are paying 80mil a year gets injured? its actually quite easy to see if a league is losing money, is the cap going up? if it is, then they are not losing money. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16769 Posts
https://nypost.com/2011/11/13/nhl-union-gets-book-smart/ then its tough to tell what is really going on. | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On July 25 2019 10:09 JimmyJRaynor wrote: unless the league is systematically hiding revenues https://nypost.com/2011/11/13/nhl-union-gets-book-smart/ then its tough to tell what is really going on. well the PA is just dumb to not audit every year as they have the right to do that. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
| ||
