On November 18 2019 04:03 GTR wrote:
https://twitter.com/WillBrinson/status/1196131027078565888

this got challenged and stood as called.

fuck the nfl.

basically the same shit as the premier league with VAR

REFS CANT EVER MAKE MISTAKES WE ARE PERFECT DONT LOOK AT THE REPLAY

Emnjay808

United States10665 Posts

November 17 2019 19:21 GMT

#1723

oh boy.

i rather clean the kitchen, living room and bathroom than finish this vikings game.

fuck

ZerOCoolSC2

9037 Posts

November 17 2019 19:32 GMT

#1724

Looks like I'm benching Mahomes next week for Jackson. I'm screwed either way because both put up numbers.

Unless someone wants to trade a top RB for him...

WindWolf

Sweden11767 Posts

November 17 2019 20:00 GMT

#1725

I like Frank Reich as HC/Play caller of the Colts. On 3rd & Goal he decides to let Quenton Nelson (Offensive Guard) play running back. While the run was just short, I like that he is not afraid to run a trick play every now and then.

UsedEgg3

126 Posts

November 17 2019 20:51 GMT

#1726

It's pretty clear that refs shouldn't have final say on reviewing their own (missed) penalty calls.

QuanticHawk

United States32132 Posts

November 17 2019 21:10 GMT

#1727

On November 18 2019 04:12 Shellshock wrote:

Show nested quote +

basically the same shit as the premier league with VAR

REFS CANT EVER MAKE MISTAKES WE ARE PERFECT DONT LOOK AT THE REPLAY

that one is clearly PI but at least soccer has the benefit of its key challenge plays usually but not always being offsideas and did it cross the goal which are based on a plain old line.

ZerOCoolSC2

9037 Posts

November 17 2019 22:02 GMT

#1728

If my pats end up in a whole against the eagles, I will scream.

Shellshock

United States97276 Posts

November 17 2019 22:04 GMT

#1729

On November 18 2019 06:10 QuanticHawk wrote:

Show nested quote +

that one is clearly PI but at least soccer has the benefit of its key challenge plays usually but not always being offsideas and did it cross the goal which are based on a plain old line.

the penalty kick reviews have been highly controversial in the premier league this year with it usually favoring the initial call on the field

UsedEgg3

126 Posts

November 17 2019 22:57 GMT

#1730

I have started 7 different QBs in FF this year: Cousins, Roethlisberger, Cousins again (dropped him after week 4), Rivers, Stafford, Daniel Jones (got 31 pts for me against the Jets), Foles (sucked today).

Thought I had finally settled in after picking up Stafford but ofc he's now missing the first games of his career. This also really dicks me over with Golladay at WR, and I already have Thielen out with the hamstring. There are no remotely decent QBs left to pick up at this point in the season which is why I grabbed Foles this week.

Up til now I averaged 117 pts per game (2nd in the league), but I'm about to be 6-5, and things are looking bleak.

Shellshock

United States97276 Posts

November 17 2019 22:58 GMT

#1731

I picked up Jameis recently because he gets a lot of empty stats that translate to decent fantasy points even though the Bucs dont win anything

cLutZ

United States19574 Posts

November 17 2019 23:43 GMT

#1732

This fumble/no fumble in Eagles-Pats is exactly why the old catch rule was the way it was. It ended up unreviewed because of another ref fuck up, but it should have been a fine under the new rule.

JimmiC

Canada22817 Posts

November 18 2019 00:07 GMT

#1733

--- Nuked ---

Shellshock

United States97276 Posts

November 18 2019 00:20 GMT

#1734

CHOKE CITY by the Cards

ZerOCoolSC2

9037 Posts

November 18 2019 00:30 GMT

#1735

It's Jimmy G so...expected outcome.

redlightdistrict

382 Posts

November 18 2019 00:33 GMT

#1736

Chick-Fil-A needs to fire its entire marketing staff. They have a bunch of commercials during Sunday football but wait...THEY ARE CLOSED ON SUNDAY! I was watching the ad thinking "hey chicken sounds good right now" oh wait i cant buy any. For fucks sake -_-;

BB might consider making Edelman QB once Brady retires. Dude has completed every pass hes made with the Pats over the years

cLutZ

United States19574 Posts

November 18 2019 01:20 GMT

#1737

On November 18 2019 09:07 JimmiC wrote:
Because the old rule had 0 issues......

I never had issues with it, same with most people, until some dopey guys like Cowherd managed to confuse themselves and started spreading the confusion. Mostly this was because they for some reason thought we needed special catch rules in the endzone, or something.

JimmiC

Canada22817 Posts

November 18 2019 01:40 GMT

#1738

--- Nuked ---

cLutZ

United States19574 Posts

November 18 2019 01:42 GMT

#1739

Those were clearly not catches, and would not have been confusing to anyone if they happened at the 50 yard line. The difference is people wanted a catch rule that magically made even a hint of possession a catch if you were over the goal line.