EPTNBA Playoffs 2013-2014 - Page 42
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
EDIT: Just give the mic to Jeff! | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
EDIT: They're certainly going to go for more than that. Probably well north of $1B. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
Ru ba
Serbia1812 Posts
not surprised about the ban ,I don't know how they gonna enforce it tho,what if the guy just comes in with bodyguards. I guess it's up to the people to mob him than lol | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
What a stupid question. They're interested in whomever has the most freaking money, regardless of skin color. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
EDIT: The Clippers will fetch, way, way more than that. The Kings just went for something like that price, LAC is a much better team with a more lucrative market. It's going to be over double that. As for banning him, we don't know what the league bylaws say. From what Silver's said, it sounds like they can force him out via vote by seizing the team and selling. | ||
|
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On April 30 2014 03:28 On_Slaught wrote: I wonder if Doc Rivers saying he wouldn't come back influenced his decision. Silver said he didn't fully decide until today. Docs decision was likely a precursor of a chilling effect upon the Clippers. It would become a black hole of the NBA while Sterling was there, forcing extreme action from the NBA. I don't think so. All Doc Rivers did was create even more publicity around the Sterling case. Could you imagine how the league would look after all this if sterling DID stay? I mean yeah, he's always been racist and there's been a little proof here and there, but it never got the widespread attention like it has now. More people knowing about it = more people upset = bigger shitstorm. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On April 30 2014 03:36 Itsmedudeman wrote: I don't think so. All Doc Rivers did was create even more publicity around the Sterling case. Could you imagine how the league would look after all this if sterling DID stay? I mean yeah, he's always been racist and there's been a little proof here and there, but it never got the widespread attention like it has now. More people knowing about it = more people upset = bigger shitstorm. Realistically I suppose the loss of sponsors was a much bigger problem for the NBA. | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On April 30 2014 03:37 On_Slaught wrote: Realistically I suppose the loss of sponsors was a much bigger problem for the NBA. Absolutely. The other owners are not going to like their wallets getting hit because of Sterling, and they would likely act if they have the capacity to do so (and it appears that they certainly do). | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Ru ba
Serbia1812 Posts
as far as I understood | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Ru ba
Serbia1812 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On April 30 2014 03:44 Ru ba wrote: The other owners can make him sell,If they vote unanimously at the board of governors he can't stay as a owner of that team. as far as I understood It's only 3/4 votes. They need 22 of the 30 to vote yes. | ||
| ||
