|
On February 21 2014 21:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 21:37 Arevall wrote:I wouldn't even dare to say that a penalty is better than 1:40 of 5vs3 without looking up the stats data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" It's such a huge advantage that I would not be shocked at all if the stats said that over a min of 5 on 3 had a higher scoring % than penalty shots.
I have a memory of hearing someone say that a penalty is an 80% save. But that was several years ago and probably for the Swedish league. And 20% scoring 5-4 is barely just ok, so naturally 5-3 is much higher.
Man, I'm rocking the statistics today.
|
On February 21 2014 21:45 Otolia wrote: Apparently Finland plans is to bet all on counter-attacks which is good when you don't have your best offensive players. All Finland games I've ever seen vs somewhat equal opponents have always been like this
|
On February 21 2014 21:46 zezamer wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 21:45 Otolia wrote: Apparently Finland plans is to bet all on counter-attacks which is good when you don't have your best offensive players. All Finland games I've ever seen vs somewhat equal opponents have always been like this
How many games have u seen? 2?
|
On February 21 2014 21:48 Juissi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 21:46 zezamer wrote:On February 21 2014 21:45 Otolia wrote: Apparently Finland plans is to bet all on counter-attacks which is good when you don't have your best offensive players. All Finland games I've ever seen vs somewhat equal opponents have always been like this How many games have u seen? 2?
already fighting within the ranks, not looking good suomi!
|
On February 21 2014 21:48 Juissi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 21:46 zezamer wrote:On February 21 2014 21:45 Otolia wrote: Apparently Finland plans is to bet all on counter-attacks which is good when you don't have your best offensive players. All Finland games I've ever seen vs somewhat equal opponents have always been like this How many games have u seen? 2? like all games past ro8 in MM/olympics last 10ish years. our strategy has never been based on holding the puck all the time like canada/russia
im talking about tight games, not some easy 6-1
|
On February 21 2014 21:46 AlternativeEgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 21:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:On February 21 2014 21:37 Arevall wrote:I wouldn't even dare to say that a penalty is better than 1:40 of 5vs3 without looking up the stats data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" It's such a huge advantage that I would not be shocked at all if the stats said that over a min of 5 on 3 had a higher scoring % than penalty shots. I have a memory of hearing someone say that a penalty is an 80% save. But that was several years ago and probably for the Swedish league. And 20% scoring 5-4 is barely just ok, so naturally 5-3 is much higher. Man, I'm rocking the statistics today. In the NHL the top teams run a PP that scores about 23% of the time and kill off about 86% of their penalties, both 5on4 and 5on3.
For just 5 on 3 the best teams are scoring over 40% of the time.
Weak charging call......
|
On February 21 2014 21:54 Orcasgt24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 21:46 AlternativeEgo wrote:On February 21 2014 21:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:On February 21 2014 21:37 Arevall wrote:I wouldn't even dare to say that a penalty is better than 1:40 of 5vs3 without looking up the stats data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" It's such a huge advantage that I would not be shocked at all if the stats said that over a min of 5 on 3 had a higher scoring % than penalty shots. I have a memory of hearing someone say that a penalty is an 80% save. But that was several years ago and probably for the Swedish league. And 20% scoring 5-4 is barely just ok, so naturally 5-3 is much higher. Man, I'm rocking the statistics today. In the NHL the top teams run a PP that scores about 23% of the time and kill off about 86% of their penalties, both 5on4 and 5on3. For just 5 on 3 the best teams are scoring over 40% of the time.
Are you presenting legit stats? That's not how you stat. You shoot 'em from the hip
|
On February 21 2014 22:01 AlternativeEgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2014 21:54 Orcasgt24 wrote:On February 21 2014 21:46 AlternativeEgo wrote:On February 21 2014 21:39 Orcasgt24 wrote:On February 21 2014 21:37 Arevall wrote:I wouldn't even dare to say that a penalty is better than 1:40 of 5vs3 without looking up the stats data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" It's such a huge advantage that I would not be shocked at all if the stats said that over a min of 5 on 3 had a higher scoring % than penalty shots. I have a memory of hearing someone say that a penalty is an 80% save. But that was several years ago and probably for the Swedish league. And 20% scoring 5-4 is barely just ok, so naturally 5-3 is much higher. Man, I'm rocking the statistics today. In the NHL the top teams run a PP that scores about 23% of the time and kill off about 86% of their penalties, both 5on4 and 5on3. For just 5 on 3 the best teams are scoring over 40% of the time. Are you presenting legit stats? That's not how you stat. You shoot 'em from the hip data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4601a/4601a5532d755d907e09e385cff6346a35f3a2f0" alt="" I did the averaging by shooting from the hip lol. NHL.com has VERY VERY VERY detailed stats
|
On February 21 2014 21:42 fLyiNgDroNe wrote: how come i'm cheering for both Lundkvist and Selanne? Fun game so far! both swell guys. i will be happy with either earning the honor to lose to the free and righteous future american champions
|
On February 21 2014 00:08 Luolis wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2014 23:56 Nausea wrote:On February 20 2014 22:42 kroko wrote:At the moment Crosby has as many points as Finlands backup goalkeeper. 2. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4601a/4601a5532d755d907e09e385cff6346a35f3a2f0" alt="" ![[image loading]](http://static.iltalehti.fi/sotshi-2014/tuttietu20214mp_sb.jpg) Fins, cocky as always. I actually think Finland will win over Sweden, but who knows. Maybe we will play at least one good game this tournament. Thats funny. I always remember swedes and especially swedish newspapers being sure that they win. Yeah, you speak the truth. It's pretty ridiculous actually.
I saw a poll about who ppl thought would win the gold. This poll was started when the semi-finalists were finalized.
Sweden 55% USA 19% Finland 14% Canada 12%
This is pretty much how it always it.
On February 21 2014 00:08 JimmyJRaynor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2014 22:38 Jer99 wrote: Not sure if its posted yet; according to sports center, tavares is out for the rest of the NHL season with an MCL and meniscus injury another Raynor insight ends up being bang on the money! Tavares out for the year with an MCL tear. The way Nicholson was muffling his answers and covering his mouth... i just knew Tavares' knee was totally fucked. And, in the women's vs. men's hockey and which is more entertaining. Doug Maclean, a guy who knows a thing of two about hockey on every level, has stated the most entertaining game so far was USA v. Canada in women's hockey. the Swiss v. Sweden bronze medal game was great. heads will roll in sweden's women's program for this loss. What program? lol.
|
|
|
|
|
GOAAAALLLLLLL!!!!
SUOMI. SUOMI. SUOMI!
|
hank that was some shit pavelec would give up yo
|
OJ !!!
|
against that ugly pumpkin headed mother fucker i hate him
|
|
defend n counter attack, ez goal now just def
|
|
|
|