|
TGT is great. There are so many ridiculous concepts I can pursue. So many Johnny cards.
On August 25 2015 11:16 WaveofShadow wrote:
Somebody help me build a deck that'll get me a few more wins so I can get Rank 10 rewards. I'm at rank 13 atm and just too lazy to do any research/work myself. (Would love rank 5 too but I've never gotten that high up before)
I'm lazy and don't plan on trying for anything past Rank 15. That's largely because I don't care about golden cards and dust them if I already have the card and also because the returns for doing so are low unless you're pushing for Rank 5.
If you're dusting everything the rewards per rank are basically:
+ Show Spoiler +Rank 20 - 55 dust
Rank 19 - 60 dust
Rank 18 - 65 dust
Rank 17 - 70 dust
Rank 16 - 75 dust
Rank 15 - 155 dust
Rank 14 - 160 dust
Rank 13 - 165 dust
Rank 12 - 170 dust
Rank 11 - 175 dust
Rank 10 - 205 dust
Rank 9 - 210 dust
Rank 8 - 215 dust
Rank 7 - 220 dust
Rank 6 - 225 dust
Rank 5 - 505 dust
Rank 4 - 510 dust
Rank 3 - 515 dust
Rank 2 - 520 dust
Rank 1 - 525 dust
Legendary - 550 dust
That's 100 durst for going from Rank 20 to 15, while 15 to 10 is only another 50 dust. 10 to 5, however, is 300 dust and definitely worth it if you can swing that.
|
Dam I was being lazy at rank 7. Guess I need to start power farming.
|
I feel the last week since the incentive was announced ranked play has been more difficult. Don't know if there's more people tryharding or I was just playing poorly/meta.
|
I find it's always pretty easy to rank up during the day but it's a lot harder when the sun starts going down. Now I'm a little screwed as what to use since if people are going to go with the new shaman it should destroy control warrior ;(. Also with no decay you can just do a little grinding during the morning where it's super easy.
|
I just need to play one game of ranked to get the rewards since I'm still plat4 or whatever right?
|
I lost so many stars trying out different Warlock decks -.-
Handlock is still the most consistent, but still has some issues against Aggro if you get poor draws.
Zoo is still stupid good, but I can't figure out any of the new cards that work well in it >
Fearsome Doomguard was a nice addition the Voidcaller deck I'm working on, which just runs kinda midrange-y but with Voidcaller/Doomguard/Fearsome Doomguard/Mal'ganas/Jaraxxus.
I'm also trying out a pure early curve Demon deck. It doesn't use a lot of new stuff, but it's actually not been too bad.
I want Golden Warlock, gotta focus instead of jumping classes
|
Oh wait you guys are talking about hearthstone ugh.
Screw you guys I'm going home.
|
On August 25 2015 22:52 Requizen wrote:I lost so many stars trying out different Warlock decks -.- Handlock is still the most consistent, but still has some issues against Aggro if you get poor draws. Zoo is still stupid good, but I can't figure out any of the new cards that work well in it > Fearsome Doomguard was a nice addition the Voidcaller deck I'm working on, which just runs kinda midrange-y but with Voidcaller/Doomguard/Fearsome Doomguard/Mal'ganas/Jaraxxus. I'm also trying out a pure early curve Demon deck. It doesn't use a lot of new stuff, but it's actually not been too bad. I want Golden Warlock, gotta focus instead of jumping classes
My most played class is priest and I am nowhere close to ever earning a golden portrait. After all this time I have 130 wins and level 56. No way in hell will I ever play enough constructed for the portrait. It's just ridiculous.
|
I have golden druid and I never play hearthstone.
But I only play the one deck and never arena.
|
313 wins on shaman is the highest I have, followed with warrior 204, lock 180 and mage 159.
|
After my gold warrior I'm getting there with Rogue at 310,warlock 235 and Mage 216. Think I got that gold warrior in like 3 months but I've been playing rogue for 2 years
|
Something like 125 on Rogue, 105 on Warlock and Hunter (because when I have to keep 40 gold quests I favour Rogue/Warlock -> Hunter 'cause they're over quickly), around... 80-90? on Warrior, and then 20-30 on every other class.
So that's around 500 total I think, but too spread to give me a golden portrait.
|
On August 25 2015 10:28 Ketara wrote:
I dunno, I'd probably be super into a girl who cosplayed Kogmaw.
Also wow Google automatically capitalized Kogmaw. I wonder what others it'll do Lux Ahri riven wukong syndra jinx garen hmm....
Google is biased towards the sexy champions. I approve.
Im wondering what you mean by google in this sentence. chrome browser uses auto correct in LL post field? Nexus phone auto correct in browser? I just dont understand for some reason.
Also yes obviously Jinx should be capitalized.
|
United States23745 Posts
Blah, had a pretty mediocre job interview today. Wish I was better at those. Oh well, learned a few things things.
|
On August 26 2015 00:14 onlywonderboy wrote:
Blah, had a pretty mediocre job interview today. Wish I was better at those. Oh well, learned a few things things.
Sorry to hear that buddeh, I hope it went better than you thought it did!
|
Yeah golden portrait might happen in like a year or two lol.
|
This is some pretty interesting(Ie: shitty) HS design stuff with Mistcaller + Show Spoiler +
I don't know why blizzard refuses to have card descriptions that actually reflect what the cards over having very simple descriptions that merely tell a board sense what it does.
|
On August 26 2015 00:21 mordek wrote:
Yeah golden portrait might happen in like a year or two lol.
Only 142 on Lock right now... ugh gonna be a while lol
|
United States23745 Posts
On August 26 2015 00:17 Requizen wrote:Show nested quote +On August 26 2015 00:14 onlywonderboy wrote:
Blah, had a pretty mediocre job interview today. Wish I was better at those. Oh well, learned a few things things. Sorry to hear that buddeh, I hope it went better than you thought it did!
One of those situations where I thought of way better answers to their questions on the ride home.
I really dislike the entire interview process in general though, I'm real bad at talking myself up.
|
On August 26 2015 00:23 Numy wrote:This is some pretty interesting(Ie: shitty) HS design stuff with Mistcaller + Show Spoiler +https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB85s2S0-lM I don't know why blizzard refuses to have card descriptions that actually reflect what the cards over having very simple descriptions that merely tell a board sense what it does.
Eh, this seems more of a implementation problem than a text problem. These are all edge cases that probably weren't thought about/noticed during development.
Blizzard does goof up their templating but I don't think this is an egregious case of that. There's also the point that unlike MTG the game itself enforces rules so they're discoverable, unlike board/card games where you'll screw something up until you encounter your local rules lawyer who reads all the errata like it's scripture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
