EPTOn May 09 2015 21:14 AlterKot wrote:
I pulled of a Ketara, I should start travelling now.
I pulled of a Ketara, I should start travelling now.
What is a Ketara?
Did you lux ult in the wrong direction twice in promos and still win the game?
Off-Topic General Discussion - Page 4957
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
Ketara
United States15065 Posts
What is a Ketara? Did you lux ult in the wrong direction twice in promos and still win the game? | ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
Ketara
United States15065 Posts
Congratulations! | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Oh well at least I could finally craft Thalnos. Next up, probably one of the Lock legendaries I don't have. | ||
|
Crusnik
United States5378 Posts
| ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
On May 10 2015 05:14 WaveofShadow wrote: Just pulled a Flame Leviathan.....yay....... Oh well at least I could finally craft Thalnos. Next up, probably one of the Lock legendaries I don't have. Just pulled my 86th straight pack without a legendary. Still more useful than Flame Leviathan. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
| ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On May 10 2015 07:17 Slayer91 wrote: you cant prove with reason that you killed the screen the screen no longer works and it's not functional for what I need it to do. (also Hume had no problem with using cause and effect in everyday language.) | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
hume backpeddling like a mofo | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On May 10 2015 07:24 Slayer91 wrote: LOL hume backpeddling like a mofo while not exactly. what he actually said is that its fine that you have a reasonable expectation that one thing was the result of the other because in your experience it has always been followed by the other thing without execption but you can't deductively demonstrate that it necessarily causes the thing. of course He does presuppose the rejection of innate ideas. | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
I mean science doesn't 100% prove anything. You can show beyond reasonable shadow of doubt, but you don't have math proof level of slam dunking a proposition. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On May 10 2015 07:40 Scip wrote: that isn't in any way controversial though. I mean science doesn't 100% prove anything. You can show beyond reasonable shadow of doubt, but you don't have math proof level of slam dunking a proposition. while it was kinda controversial when Hume wrote it. and he went further and said that if one ball in motion hit another ball in motion that you couldn't say definitively that the first ball caused the second ball to move. + Show Spoiler + what Hume would and did say about the balls in motion is that we have a tendency to assume that the first ball will cause the second one to move based on our experiences of the balls always moving when they hit each other and never having a counterexample. however this in no way demonstrates that the first ball necessarily causes the second ball to move. With my computer he'd say that even If I took it to a computer repair place and they showed definitively how the fall moved and affected parts to make the screen mess up that still wouldn't show that it caused it. It gets kinda technical as to exactly why he thinks that though. suffice to say that a lot of people (Such as Russel did before he died) still think Hume's claims can't be rejected, or at least that nobody has given a sufficient counterargument to them. of course a lot of people disagree with him on that like Kant. (I'd get into that but its pretty damn confusing without a lot of explanation.) admittedly I should admit that I'm not an exact expert on these things but mainly basing them off of my own readings and what Russel says in History of western philosophy (really great book btw especially how Russel links philosophy with world events and gives really good explanations while avoiding going into too much detail to confuse the reader.) and what my philosophy teacher taught in class. regardless though the screen on my netbook no longer works and i'm forced to hook it up to my tv to get stuff off of it. also anyone know if the new wolfenstein's any good? game informer gave it a 7 and a half but I was wondering if anyone's actually played it | ||
|
Prog
United Kingdom1470 Posts
| ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On May 10 2015 07:58 Prog wrote: History of western philosophy is actually the worst thing Russell ever wrote. Especially the more modern discussions around german idealism and Kant are not to be trusted. really? from what I've read it's supposed to be decent. although obviously Russel's not the definitive source on a lot of the philosophers in it. and of course opinions on philosophers have probably shifted since when he wrote it int the 40s so based on wikipedia yeah reviews seem to be mixed. although most of the objections are about Kant. I thought the stuff on Hume was pretty decent though and I don't know enough about the rest of the german idealists to commentate on it. thanks for telling me. | ||
|
Prog
United Kingdom1470 Posts
Nevertheless, it's not a bad place to start. Especially because it's very accessible. Russell has definitely written better and more interesting stuff though. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
| ||
