|
The new skin packs' looking good, especially the tail light on medivac
|
On August 15 2019 18:59 TheOneAboveU wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 18:58 Elentos wrote:
The probe skin's mining laser is green.
That is all. Literally unplayable, I can't even tell what unit this is.
yeah in my tvp games i will probably mistake them for banelings
|
On August 15 2019 18:56 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 18:56 TheOneAboveU wrote:On August 15 2019 18:55 starkiller123 wrote:
it feels like Maynarde took on Wolf's legacy of forcing nicknames onto players lol I do miss the hair style analysis though. Maynarde is at the peak of hair styles in SC2 so would be unfair to analyse those lesser than himself.
the man is fucking metal along with his hair, its not possible to find a caster doing cast thing while playing BFG division
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
Neeb's adept/phoenix/oracle play was honestly the most NA sequence of events I've seen from him in a while.
|
France13023 Posts
On August 15 2019 18:57 deacon.frost wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 18:53 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:31 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:27 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:11 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:00 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 17:58 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 17:55 Poopi wrote:On August 15 2019 17:52 deacon.frost wrote:And they told me soO isn't bad. Obviously he isn't and this is just a Dream  Well he isn't bad just not at TIME's level in ZvT. Serral almost got crushed 3-0 too, is he bad tho? Why do you think soO's good currently? What recent results did I miss?  He didn't say soO "isn't good" he said soO is bad. soO being a bad starcraft pro will never be true. I never get why some people think only top 12 players in the world is "good" and the rest are "bad". Sure soO isn't among the best in the world atm, doesn't mean he is bad or not good or that he shouldn't have a chance against Time. Well yeah, soO is better than everyone in thsi thread, but he's not tha good considering in that tournament. Also he's worse than he used to be which implies - he's bad? If you're used to be the number one Zerg and people say - look man, it's soO, it will be fine and it isn't, he's worse -> he's bad. I just see this binary, if you're not goood anymore then you're bad. And there's nothing wrong with this, everybody has their slumps. soO has one right now. Big one. You are confusing the word worse with bad, being worse at something means you aren't as good as you were before. Being bad at something mans generally not being good at something. Like how I am bad at sewing. Professional athletes are never bad at their actual sport, RO32 GSL players are never bad at starcraft. Learn language Well obviously Im ean soO is bad compared to his form and the top, not the rest of the SC2 scene playerbase. This would make me a good player which is stupid. soO is a bad pro player. Do I have to word everything in the most precise way to people stop nit picking? C'mon, soO is not good ATM. Also go learn yourself. I'm fine, thanks. Yeah obviously you say one thing but mean another, makes sense. I also commonly say one thing but mean another, everyone makes mistakes. Its just funny when people on the internet say "yeah, I said something that was wrong but actually I'm not wrong because what I meant was right". It is very nitpicky, I am just very tired of everything being hyperbole, even if you lose a series you are a bad player, if you win one you are awesome and amazing. There is never anything inbetween, Time is playing amazing, such a young talent, the coming of the next sc2 version of Flash for sure. soO, who cares he is just bad. Maybe Time is not the coming of the sc2 bonjwa and maybe soO isn't a bad sc2 player. How about Time played great, soO played worse but both are good players. This mentality is everywhere and it really twists the perspective and I guess it made me touchy sorry about that. Well I am not comparing soO to the playerbase, I am comparing him to his former himself and to the top players. In both of these comparisons he's bad. Now he's slumping thus he's bad for me. I just didn't say what other players I was comparing him with, fine, but I am not gonna compare soO to some trash just so he comes out good. He's the god damn soO and there should be some standards. Similarly I am not gonna compare Serral to some low scrub, I am gonna compare him against the best because he should be compared to the best, not to some worse players.
He is not playing that bad but you don't accurately judge how well players play so that's probably why you are mistaken on that one? TIME was just playing as well as vs Serral, and Serral ZvT is better than soO's since a long time
|
ShoWTimE channeling his inner AlphaStar
|
Germany3367 Posts
I get so nervous when a Protoss player doesn't built Immortals in PvP. Seems like an auto loss.
Edit: Ah good, he's building them now. Why would you ever not build them.
|
Czech Republic12134 Posts
On August 15 2019 19:01 Poopi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 18:57 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:53 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:31 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:27 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:11 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:00 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 17:58 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 17:55 Poopi wrote:On August 15 2019 17:52 deacon.frost wrote:And they told me soO isn't bad. Obviously he isn't and this is just a Dream Well he isn't bad just not at TIME's level in ZvT. Serral almost got crushed 3-0 too, is he bad tho? Why do you think soO's good currently? What recent results did I miss? He didn't say soO "isn't good" he said soO is bad. soO being a bad starcraft pro will never be true. I never get why some people think only top 12 players in the world is "good" and the rest are "bad". Sure soO isn't among the best in the world atm, doesn't mean he is bad or not good or that he shouldn't have a chance against Time. Well yeah, soO is better than everyone in thsi thread, but he's not tha good considering in that tournament. Also he's worse than he used to be which implies - he's bad? If you're used to be the number one Zerg and people say - look man, it's soO, it will be fine and it isn't, he's worse -> he's bad. I just see this binary, if you're not goood anymore then you're bad. And there's nothing wrong with this, everybody has their slumps. soO has one right now. Big one. You are confusing the word worse with bad, being worse at something means you aren't as good as you were before. Being bad at something mans generally not being good at something. Like how I am bad at sewing. Professional athletes are never bad at their actual sport, RO32 GSL players are never bad at starcraft. Learn language Well obviously Im ean soO is bad compared to his form and the top, not the rest of the SC2 scene playerbase. This would make me a good player which is stupid. soO is a bad pro player. Do I have to word everything in the most precise way to people stop nit picking? C'mon, soO is not good ATM. Also go learn yourself. I'm fine, thanks. Yeah obviously you say one thing but mean another, makes sense. I also commonly say one thing but mean another, everyone makes mistakes. Its just funny when people on the internet say "yeah, I said something that was wrong but actually I'm not wrong because what I meant was right". It is very nitpicky, I am just very tired of everything being hyperbole, even if you lose a series you are a bad player, if you win one you are awesome and amazing. There is never anything inbetween, Time is playing amazing, such a young talent, the coming of the next sc2 version of Flash for sure. soO, who cares he is just bad. Maybe Time is not the coming of the sc2 bonjwa and maybe soO isn't a bad sc2 player. How about Time played great, soO played worse but both are good players. This mentality is everywhere and it really twists the perspective and I guess it made me touchy sorry about that. Well I am not comparing soO to the playerbase, I am comparing him to his former himself and to the top players. In both of these comparisons he's bad. Now he's slumping thus he's bad for me. I just didn't say what other players I was comparing him with, fine, but I am not gonna compare soO to some trash just so he comes out good. He's the god damn soO and there should be some standards. Similarly I am not gonna compare Serral to some low scrub, I am gonna compare him against the best because he should be compared to the best, not to some worse players. He is not playing that bad but you don't accurately judge how well players play so that's probably why you are mistaken on that one? TIME was just playing as well as vs Serral, and Serral ZvT is better than soO's since a long time
And soO's PvZ is as bad as his ZvT as he just lost Code S RO16 to it. So he has just ZvZ nowadays? I love soO, I want him winning shit, but if he wants to win just based on ZvZ he needs to go to the WCS
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On August 15 2019 19:02 TheOneAboveU wrote:
I get so nervous when a Protoss player doesn't built Immortals in PvP. Seems like an auto loss.
Edit: Ah good, he's building them now. Why would you ever not build them.
When you don't have observers and are surrounded by DTs
|
On August 15 2019 18:55 TheOneAboveU wrote:
People get nervous when we chant "Deutschland" in foreign countries, so we don't do it anymore.
Also NA sucks.
Oh, we Finns don't mind. We even tried to have one of your royals lead us!
Also, NA is inadequate.
|
welp...i ve called players being bad many times but never really meaned it, i mean the way it should be understood
|
France13023 Posts
On August 15 2019 19:03 deacon.frost wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 19:01 Poopi wrote:On August 15 2019 18:57 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:53 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:31 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:27 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:11 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:00 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 17:58 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 17:55 Poopi wrote:
[quote]
Well he isn't bad just not at TIME's level in ZvT. Serral almost got crushed 3-0 too, is he bad tho? Why do you think soO's good currently? What recent results did I miss? He didn't say soO "isn't good" he said soO is bad. soO being a bad starcraft pro will never be true. I never get why some people think only top 12 players in the world is "good" and the rest are "bad". Sure soO isn't among the best in the world atm, doesn't mean he is bad or not good or that he shouldn't have a chance against Time. Well yeah, soO is better than everyone in thsi thread, but he's not tha good considering in that tournament. Also he's worse than he used to be which implies - he's bad? If you're used to be the number one Zerg and people say - look man, it's soO, it will be fine and it isn't, he's worse -> he's bad. I just see this binary, if you're not goood anymore then you're bad. And there's nothing wrong with this, everybody has their slumps. soO has one right now. Big one. You are confusing the word worse with bad, being worse at something means you aren't as good as you were before. Being bad at something mans generally not being good at something. Like how I am bad at sewing. Professional athletes are never bad at their actual sport, RO32 GSL players are never bad at starcraft. Learn language Well obviously Im ean soO is bad compared to his form and the top, not the rest of the SC2 scene playerbase. This would make me a good player which is stupid. soO is a bad pro player. Do I have to word everything in the most precise way to people stop nit picking? C'mon, soO is not good ATM. Also go learn yourself. I'm fine, thanks. Yeah obviously you say one thing but mean another, makes sense. I also commonly say one thing but mean another, everyone makes mistakes. Its just funny when people on the internet say "yeah, I said something that was wrong but actually I'm not wrong because what I meant was right". It is very nitpicky, I am just very tired of everything being hyperbole, even if you lose a series you are a bad player, if you win one you are awesome and amazing. There is never anything inbetween, Time is playing amazing, such a young talent, the coming of the next sc2 version of Flash for sure. soO, who cares he is just bad. Maybe Time is not the coming of the sc2 bonjwa and maybe soO isn't a bad sc2 player. How about Time played great, soO played worse but both are good players. This mentality is everywhere and it really twists the perspective and I guess it made me touchy sorry about that. Well I am not comparing soO to the playerbase, I am comparing him to his former himself and to the top players. In both of these comparisons he's bad. Now he's slumping thus he's bad for me. I just didn't say what other players I was comparing him with, fine, but I am not gonna compare soO to some trash just so he comes out good. He's the god damn soO and there should be some standards. Similarly I am not gonna compare Serral to some low scrub, I am gonna compare him against the best because he should be compared to the best, not to some worse players. He is not playing that bad but you don't accurately judge how well players play so that's probably why you are mistaken on that one? TIME was just playing as well as vs Serral, and Serral ZvT is better than soO's since a long time And soO's PvZ is as bad as his ZvT as he just lost Code S RO16 to it. So he has just ZvZ nowadays? I love soO, I want him winning shit, but if he wants to win just based on ZvZ he needs to go to the WCS
Could have gone either way, he lost 1-2 each time. Bo3 got some variance.
|
|
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On August 15 2019 19:03 deacon.frost wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 19:01 Poopi wrote:On August 15 2019 18:57 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:53 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:31 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:27 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:11 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:00 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 17:58 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 17:55 Poopi wrote:
[quote]
Well he isn't bad just not at TIME's level in ZvT. Serral almost got crushed 3-0 too, is he bad tho? Why do you think soO's good currently? What recent results did I miss? He didn't say soO "isn't good" he said soO is bad. soO being a bad starcraft pro will never be true. I never get why some people think only top 12 players in the world is "good" and the rest are "bad". Sure soO isn't among the best in the world atm, doesn't mean he is bad or not good or that he shouldn't have a chance against Time. Well yeah, soO is better than everyone in thsi thread, but he's not tha good considering in that tournament. Also he's worse than he used to be which implies - he's bad? If you're used to be the number one Zerg and people say - look man, it's soO, it will be fine and it isn't, he's worse -> he's bad. I just see this binary, if you're not goood anymore then you're bad. And there's nothing wrong with this, everybody has their slumps. soO has one right now. Big one. You are confusing the word worse with bad, being worse at something means you aren't as good as you were before. Being bad at something mans generally not being good at something. Like how I am bad at sewing. Professional athletes are never bad at their actual sport, RO32 GSL players are never bad at starcraft. Learn language Well obviously Im ean soO is bad compared to his form and the top, not the rest of the SC2 scene playerbase. This would make me a good player which is stupid. soO is a bad pro player. Do I have to word everything in the most precise way to people stop nit picking? C'mon, soO is not good ATM. Also go learn yourself. I'm fine, thanks. Yeah obviously you say one thing but mean another, makes sense. I also commonly say one thing but mean another, everyone makes mistakes. Its just funny when people on the internet say "yeah, I said something that was wrong but actually I'm not wrong because what I meant was right". It is very nitpicky, I am just very tired of everything being hyperbole, even if you lose a series you are a bad player, if you win one you are awesome and amazing. There is never anything inbetween, Time is playing amazing, such a young talent, the coming of the next sc2 version of Flash for sure. soO, who cares he is just bad. Maybe Time is not the coming of the sc2 bonjwa and maybe soO isn't a bad sc2 player. How about Time played great, soO played worse but both are good players. This mentality is everywhere and it really twists the perspective and I guess it made me touchy sorry about that. Well I am not comparing soO to the playerbase, I am comparing him to his former himself and to the top players. In both of these comparisons he's bad. Now he's slumping thus he's bad for me. I just didn't say what other players I was comparing him with, fine, but I am not gonna compare soO to some trash just so he comes out good. He's the god damn soO and there should be some standards. Similarly I am not gonna compare Serral to some low scrub, I am gonna compare him against the best because he should be compared to the best, not to some worse players. He is not playing that bad but you don't accurately judge how well players play so that's probably why you are mistaken on that one? TIME was just playing as well as vs Serral, and Serral ZvT is better than soO's since a long time And soO's PvZ is as bad as his ZvT as he just lost Code S RO16 to it. So he has just ZvZ nowadays? I love soO, I want him winning shit, but if he wants to win just based on ZvZ he needs to go to the WCS
soO's ZvZ is also not in shape.
|
So far everyone using the new skins has lost.
|
Czech Republic12134 Posts
On August 15 2019 19:06 Poopi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 19:03 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 19:01 Poopi wrote:On August 15 2019 18:57 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:53 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:31 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:27 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:11 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:00 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 17:58 deacon.frost wrote:[quote] Why do you think soO's good currently? What recent results did I miss? He didn't say soO "isn't good" he said soO is bad. soO being a bad starcraft pro will never be true. I never get why some people think only top 12 players in the world is "good" and the rest are "bad". Sure soO isn't among the best in the world atm, doesn't mean he is bad or not good or that he shouldn't have a chance against Time. Well yeah, soO is better than everyone in thsi thread, but he's not tha good considering in that tournament. Also he's worse than he used to be which implies - he's bad? If you're used to be the number one Zerg and people say - look man, it's soO, it will be fine and it isn't, he's worse -> he's bad. I just see this binary, if you're not goood anymore then you're bad. And there's nothing wrong with this, everybody has their slumps. soO has one right now. Big one. You are confusing the word worse with bad, being worse at something means you aren't as good as you were before. Being bad at something mans generally not being good at something. Like how I am bad at sewing. Professional athletes are never bad at their actual sport, RO32 GSL players are never bad at starcraft. Learn language Well obviously Im ean soO is bad compared to his form and the top, not the rest of the SC2 scene playerbase. This would make me a good player which is stupid. soO is a bad pro player. Do I have to word everything in the most precise way to people stop nit picking? C'mon, soO is not good ATM. Also go learn yourself. I'm fine, thanks. Yeah obviously you say one thing but mean another, makes sense. I also commonly say one thing but mean another, everyone makes mistakes. Its just funny when people on the internet say "yeah, I said something that was wrong but actually I'm not wrong because what I meant was right". It is very nitpicky, I am just very tired of everything being hyperbole, even if you lose a series you are a bad player, if you win one you are awesome and amazing. There is never anything inbetween, Time is playing amazing, such a young talent, the coming of the next sc2 version of Flash for sure. soO, who cares he is just bad. Maybe Time is not the coming of the sc2 bonjwa and maybe soO isn't a bad sc2 player. How about Time played great, soO played worse but both are good players. This mentality is everywhere and it really twists the perspective and I guess it made me touchy sorry about that. Well I am not comparing soO to the playerbase, I am comparing him to his former himself and to the top players. In both of these comparisons he's bad. Now he's slumping thus he's bad for me. I just didn't say what other players I was comparing him with, fine, but I am not gonna compare soO to some trash just so he comes out good. He's the god damn soO and there should be some standards. Similarly I am not gonna compare Serral to some low scrub, I am gonna compare him against the best because he should be compared to the best, not to some worse players. He is not playing that bad but you don't accurately judge how well players play so that's probably why you are mistaken on that one? TIME was just playing as well as vs Serral, and Serral ZvT is better than soO's since a long time And soO's PvZ is as bad as his ZvT as he just lost Code S RO16 to it. So he has just ZvZ nowadays? I love soO, I want him winning shit, but if he wants to win just based on ZvZ he needs to go to the WCS Could have gone either way, he lost 1-2 each time. Bo3 got some variance.
Sure, but his trongest thing is ZvZ which isn't very helpful in Korea 
On August 15 2019 19:07 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 19:03 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 19:01 Poopi wrote:On August 15 2019 18:57 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:53 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:31 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:27 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 18:11 deacon.frost wrote:On August 15 2019 18:00 Shuffleblade wrote:On August 15 2019 17:58 deacon.frost wrote:[quote] Why do you think soO's good currently? What recent results did I miss? He didn't say soO "isn't good" he said soO is bad. soO being a bad starcraft pro will never be true. I never get why some people think only top 12 players in the world is "good" and the rest are "bad". Sure soO isn't among the best in the world atm, doesn't mean he is bad or not good or that he shouldn't have a chance against Time. Well yeah, soO is better than everyone in thsi thread, but he's not tha good considering in that tournament. Also he's worse than he used to be which implies - he's bad? If you're used to be the number one Zerg and people say - look man, it's soO, it will be fine and it isn't, he's worse -> he's bad. I just see this binary, if you're not goood anymore then you're bad. And there's nothing wrong with this, everybody has their slumps. soO has one right now. Big one. You are confusing the word worse with bad, being worse at something means you aren't as good as you were before. Being bad at something mans generally not being good at something. Like how I am bad at sewing. Professional athletes are never bad at their actual sport, RO32 GSL players are never bad at starcraft. Learn language Well obviously Im ean soO is bad compared to his form and the top, not the rest of the SC2 scene playerbase. This would make me a good player which is stupid. soO is a bad pro player. Do I have to word everything in the most precise way to people stop nit picking? C'mon, soO is not good ATM. Also go learn yourself. I'm fine, thanks. Yeah obviously you say one thing but mean another, makes sense. I also commonly say one thing but mean another, everyone makes mistakes. Its just funny when people on the internet say "yeah, I said something that was wrong but actually I'm not wrong because what I meant was right". It is very nitpicky, I am just very tired of everything being hyperbole, even if you lose a series you are a bad player, if you win one you are awesome and amazing. There is never anything inbetween, Time is playing amazing, such a young talent, the coming of the next sc2 version of Flash for sure. soO, who cares he is just bad. Maybe Time is not the coming of the sc2 bonjwa and maybe soO isn't a bad sc2 player. How about Time played great, soO played worse but both are good players. This mentality is everywhere and it really twists the perspective and I guess it made me touchy sorry about that. Well I am not comparing soO to the playerbase, I am comparing him to his former himself and to the top players. In both of these comparisons he's bad. Now he's slumping thus he's bad for me. I just didn't say what other players I was comparing him with, fine, but I am not gonna compare soO to some trash just so he comes out good. He's the god damn soO and there should be some standards. Similarly I am not gonna compare Serral to some low scrub, I am gonna compare him against the best because he should be compared to the best, not to some worse players. He is not playing that bad but you don't accurately judge how well players play so that's probably why you are mistaken on that one? TIME was just playing as well as vs Serral, and Serral ZvT is better than soO's since a long time And soO's PvZ is as bad as his ZvT as he just lost Code S RO16 to it. So he has just ZvZ nowadays? I love soO, I want him winning shit, but if he wants to win just based on ZvZ he needs to go to the WCS soO's ZvZ is also not in shape.
Yeah, this is getting worse with every comment.
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On August 15 2019 19:08 yht9657 wrote:
So far everyone using the new skins has lost.
R I G G E D
|
Czech Republic12134 Posts
On August 15 2019 19:09 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 19:08 yht9657 wrote:
So far everyone using the new skins has lost. R I G G E D
Nah, it's just a curse, don't buy the new skins unless you want to lose from now on!
|
On August 15 2019 19:08 yht9657 wrote:
So far everyone using the new skins has lost.
dese are skins with debuff effects apparently
|
On August 15 2019 19:10 seemsgood wrote:Show nested quote +On August 15 2019 19:08 yht9657 wrote:
So far everyone using the new skins has lost. dese are skins with debuff effects apparently
imagine if a bug like this gets discovered...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
