|
On August 14 2016 08:36 Kerence wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2016 08:29 Nebuchad wrote:On August 14 2016 08:26 Kerence wrote:On August 14 2016 08:23 Nebuchad wrote:On August 14 2016 08:21 Kerence wrote:On August 14 2016 08:16 Nebuchad wrote:On August 14 2016 08:10 Kerence wrote:On August 14 2016 08:04 Nebuchad wrote:On August 14 2016 08:02 Kerence wrote:On August 14 2016 08:00 Nebuchad wrote:
[quote]
I'm against any form of region locking. I dislike how this community is mad for letting Blizzard change the 92% lock to a 96% lock and is now shitting on foreigners because of that meaningless change, when it was the same community that pushed to get us to the 92% lock in the first place. Why would it be the same people who pushed for region lock that are now complaining about it? They aren't. People aren't pushing for a return to 2013, they're pushing for a return to 2015, which is senseless. There is no rational reason to be mad at 2016 if you were fine with 2015. Eh, personally at least I watched some of the WCS games in 2015. I haven't even bothered to watch most of the weekend tournaments outside of a few specific players I care about in 2016. I've even been skipping the finals lately. This DH is probably the most I've watched a WCS tournament this year. I'd say 2015 was better. Well, you do yourself. But there is still no rational reason why watching an event with 7 koreans is inherently better than watching an event with 4 koreans. Except I prefer watching players I care about. Matches are better when I actually care about who wins. Since I watch mostly Koreans I know those players better. So it's certainly better with 7 players I care about than 4 (I'm not saying there are no foreigners I like, but there are certainly more Koreans I care about). And the Korean tournaments are not on times where I can watch them live. So no Koreans at weekend tournaments means there are fewer players I care about. In that case you should also be sad that the pre2015 Koreans were banned, cause you would have even more than 7 back then. Again, the problem isn't wanting more Koreans, the problem is wanting 7 koreans instead of 4 and being really devastated that this number changed in such a meaningless fashion. Well obviously that goes without saying. I don't want region lock to begin with. But if we have to have region lock I would prefer the 2015 model over the 2016 one. Also, I normally try not to complain about it to begin with, because I don't really feel it adds anything to complain, I just don't watch instead. Well then your position is rational, but it doesn't go without saying at all. Part of why we got the 2015 system is because the community pushed for it. The 2016 system is the one who gets shit on, not region locking in general. There was no talk of WCS welfare in 2015, that system went swimmingly. I meant it goes without saying that: Show nested quote +On August 14 2016 08:23 Nebuchad wrote:
In that case you should also be sad that the pre2015 Koreans were banned as in me personally not liking it. And there might be less complaining about it if there were still Koreans at weekend tournaments, but who knows. Honestly though, is there really that much complaining to begin with really, are you sure that it isn't just a few vocal people? Just like there used to be a few people who posted stuff like "Oh, only Koreans left in the tournament, time to stop watching." back then.
If nobody speaks against them, then "a few vocal people" become the voice of the community.
So I'm speaking against them.
|
I'm still not used to fusion core being lib upgrade location so whenever I see it, I get super hype for all of 2 seconds
|
is it the beginning of the comeback ?
|
Is that the shadown build? Every unit?
|
On August 14 2016 08:40 [PkF] Wire wrote:
is it the beginning of the comeback ?
Probably not? I doubt Drogo will lose this series either way.
|
On August 14 2016 08:40 [PkF] Wire wrote:
is it the beginning of the comeback ?
of a throw?*
|
On August 14 2016 08:37 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2016 08:37 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 14 2016 08:35 IntoTheheart wrote:On August 14 2016 08:35 Cricketer12 wrote:On August 14 2016 08:34 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Did you agree on a proper definition of shitposting ? 99% of what goes into LR threads Since we don't actually have people doing live reports anymore.  Live reports are like bw pathing. You have to go with the times man, don't live in your nostalgia. We should test out live reports that purposely leave out information from the overlay to keep things more exciting
Haha i first wanted to go down that route myself 
The funny thing is that that's probably true as well though, not pointing out everything and leaving mystery is a popular way to create tension in literature
|
On August 14 2016 08:37 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2016 08:37 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 14 2016 08:35 IntoTheheart wrote:On August 14 2016 08:35 Cricketer12 wrote:On August 14 2016 08:34 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Did you agree on a proper definition of shitposting ? 99% of what goes into LR threads Since we don't actually have people doing live reports anymore. Live reports are like bw pathing. You have to go with the times man, don't live in your nostalgia. Okay with that, you're on the list.
That was my goal, surprised it took so long to get on there 
|
On August 14 2016 08:41 The_Red_Viper wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2016 08:37 Elentos wrote:On August 14 2016 08:37 The_Red_Viper wrote:On August 14 2016 08:35 IntoTheheart wrote:On August 14 2016 08:35 Cricketer12 wrote:On August 14 2016 08:34 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Did you agree on a proper definition of shitposting ? 99% of what goes into LR threads Since we don't actually have people doing live reports anymore. Live reports are like bw pathing. You have to go with the times man, don't live in your nostalgia. We should test out live reports that purposely leave out information from the overlay to keep things more exciting Haha i first wanted to go down that route myself The funny thing is that that's probably true as well though, not pointing out everything and leaving mystery is a popular way to create tension in literature
Live reports by default leave out a ton of information.
|
Aiming for tempests + disruptors, ha ha
|
On August 14 2016 08:40 ArtyK wrote:
Is that the shadown build? Every unit?
How do you counter 1 of everything?
2 liberators for every thing.
|
Polt gonna need more medivacs?
|
|
|
|
|
United States97276 Posts
if he loses after getting to Tempests he's definitely going to tilt
|
Drogo's liberator focus firing is pretty bad. That's why you need 6 tempests.
|
On August 14 2016 08:43 Phredxor wrote:
Polt gonna need more medivacs?
He has it on good authority that a top 16 Terran player in both Korean leagues dislikes making medivacs.
|
|
|
yeah Polt just set himself behind to be able to play well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
