EPT[WCS] Spring Championships 2016 - Page 37
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
XPA
Germany242 Posts
| ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
we need kespa's investigation on this right now calling the south korean ambassy as we speak | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
|
Incognoto
France10239 Posts
On May 14 2016 22:58 Incognoto wrote: I don't see the difference between ladder and tournament though. They're both a game of Starcraft. I believe that the stalemate conditions are the same for any game of Starcraft, whether custom or on ladder. Thus, if Polt can force stalemate conditions, then there is a stalemate. Any more doubt? Both players saw the timer. The observers did not because (as I said before), it was a custom OBS map. This is also the correct decision from referees. There is no distinction between ladder and tournament games: both of them have the same win and stalemate conditions. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
| ||
|
Topin
Peru10128 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/R1CH/IPL4/Day2/504_04609_t.jpg) | ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
On May 14 2016 23:00 travis wrote: I hope polt wins and everyone gets even more mad Just like MKP vs PartinG | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
On May 14 2016 22:53 Elentos wrote: Or it wouldn't have been if Strange had the balls to go kill him with the units he has. But if he was aware of the timer, that means he accepted the game would end in a tie. the question is: will Polt demonstrate enough balls to forfeit this game, because he lost it fair and square. | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On May 14 2016 22:59 superfluousman1994 wrote: You guys are basically arguing that forced 3fold repetitions or stalemates in chess shouldn't be draws if one player has a large material lead. There are conditions for draws built into the game. Polt played to those conditions. He made it. It is a ladder mechanic. It is not in the tournament rules either. Win condition is: Kill all enemy buildings. The game was won and Strange would have won with 2 more minutes. | ||
|
Vega62a
946 Posts
On May 14 2016 22:59 IAmWithStupid wrote: He was supply blocked, so no production. Ah - good catch. My bad. | ||
|
MASTERCAKES
United States127 Posts
| ||
|
Musicus
Germany23580 Posts
But that timer should never have influence on any tournament game ever again. | ||
|
fezvez
France3021 Posts
Great, solid decision from admins. | ||
|
Magnifico
1958 Posts
On May 14 2016 22:59 [PkF] Wire wrote: I don't see how anyone could think this is not a rematch. Let's go ! Yeah, the argument that the draw mechanic is made for "ladder games" without a referee is arbitrary. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On May 14 2016 23:00 juvenal wrote: the question is: will Polt demonstrate enough balls to forfeit this game, because he lost it fair and square. Not according to the engine. | ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46491 Posts
On May 14 2016 22:58 Makro wrote: i'm gonna throw the magic word matchfix You're not being clever by making a stupid implication. | ||
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On May 14 2016 22:59 NarutO wrote: Worst decision ever. I disagree. Polt played to draw and reached the timer. If the rules don't account for this, regaming is fine. | ||
|
XPA
Germany242 Posts
| ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
| ||
| ||
