EPThe should have just gone for it earlier if he was going to delay his third like that
[Code A] Day 3 - Season 3 2015 - Page 6
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
he should have just gone for it earlier if he was going to delay his third like that | ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
Poll: Recommend MMA vs YongHwa Game 2? ★- Do not see this game no matter what (0) ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3) ★★★- Good game (0) ★★★★- Highly recommended game (0) ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0) 3 total votes Your vote: Recommend MMA vs YongHwa Game 2? (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24203 Posts
| ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24203 Posts
| ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
| ||
|
Pyloss
Germany1515 Posts
| ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24203 Posts
On July 10 2015 21:28 Bojas wrote: I don't understand YongHwa's gameplan at all. Wasn't he planning on doing a full on 2 base allin? I'm only half paying attention, but I recall YongHwa cutting workers after 50? I think he wanted to take a third (the probe going to the location and the probe count around 54 indicate this) but he just decided to all-in with 20ish stalkers instead because he thought his position was unrecoverable otherwise -which was wrong IMO, but anyway... | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24203 Posts
| ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24203 Posts
| ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
On July 10 2015 21:29 [PkF] Wire wrote: I think he wanted to take a third (the probe going to the location and the probe count around 54 indicate this) but he just decided to all-in with 20ish stalkers instead because he thought his position was unrecoverable otherwise -which was wrong IMO, but anyway... He was like 10 workers behind most of the game and took a late third? Is it normal to cut workers before you take a third? | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24203 Posts
On July 10 2015 21:32 Bojas wrote: He was like 10 workers behind most of the game and took a late third? Is it normal to cut workers before you take a third? With his gameplan it's not a big deal to have only 60ish workers since you just want the minerals on the third. And no he didn't take his third, he only took it after his all-in failed. Otherwise with some builds it's normal to cut workers so as to have the minerals to afford the 3rd. | ||
|
curutcis
San Marino284 Posts
 | ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
On July 10 2015 21:33 [PkF] Wire wrote: With his gameplan it's not a big deal to have only 60ish workers since you just want the minerals on the third. And no he didn't take his third, he only took it after his all-in failed. Otherwise with some builds it's normal to cut workers so as to have the minerals to afford the 3rd. I see. I always kind of mindlessly keep producing SCVs until 66-70ish. | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
| ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24203 Posts
| ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
| ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
he's now in horrible position | ||
|
D-light
Finland7364 Posts
| ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
| ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
| ||
| ||
