EPTJust look at that bonjwa-like PvT win rate. It's not even funny.
[Code S] Ro4 Day 1 Season 1 2015 - Page 28
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Sakat
Croatia1599 Posts
Just look at that bonjwa-like PvT win rate. It's not even funny. | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55550 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:10 pure.Wasted wrote: He's 84% against Terrans since the start of December. Am I overreacting? Life dominates ZvZ pretty much. | ||
|
spacemonkeyy
Australia477 Posts
Life just happens to play the same way. Would rather watch a 4-1 of different build order games than watch a 4-3 macro/micro heavy games with essentially the same unit composition and story line (i.e TvZ). Diversity is what I want as a viewer. | ||
|
SackOfWetMice
United States288 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:17 Elentos wrote: Finally I catch you post this so I can show you that you're wrong and that you have to put more effort into your trolling. This is the last balance change done to this game. After June 5th of 2014, Zest had the following placements: top 8 Code S season 2, top 4 Code S season 3, top 4 Hot6 Cup, 2nd at IEM Toronto, 1st at KeSPA Cup. This is a month-long period of solid placements even after all balance updates were done. I've already gone through and disseminated that argument in a different thread, no need to derail this one (which is about the GSL) and explain to you how you're incorrect. Stay on topic please. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
soO would be in the "not yet" category, he is a KeSPA-switch guy, itsn't he? Symbol is a pretty good name to put here, I think he is on of the most often overlooked great players. On March 11 2015 20:17 The_Templar wrote: TaeJa never had a GSL trophy either and he was pretty clearly the best player at multiple points. Also, Maru. Honestly, as much as I like TaeJa, I was never truly convinced by him. He was definitely the best "travelling Korean" for some time, but there was this something missing when he played in GSL. But he is also definitely up there. And silly me, I somehow thought Maru has a trophy. | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:12 The_Templar wrote: I did too. herO and Life are pretty good against T too though? :D Sorry for the confusion guys, I could have been clearer. In the same timeframe, herO is 72% v Korean Terrans, a full 10% below PartinG's. Life's v Korean T is at 65%. | ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
Were these macro games or was 2 of the Wins Bullshit Builds from our Guides here and 2 of them "protossed"? | ||
|
Eliezar
United States481 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:17 The_Templar wrote: TaeJa never had a GSL trophy either and he was pretty clearly the best player at multiple points. Also, Maru. Taeja was pretty clearly the best player when exactly? I admit, i am probably biased against Taeja, but i can't remember this being true EVER  | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
From December till now, Life's ZvZ vs Koreans is at 72%, still 10% lower than PartinG's vT. From January of 2014 till now, Life's ZvZ vs Koreans is at... 72%. Literally within 1% of difference in more than a year. What in the hell. | ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
| ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:25 pure.Wasted wrote: From December till now, Life's ZvZ vs Koreans is at 72%, still 10% lower than PartinG's vT. From January of 2014 till now, Life's ZvZ vs Koreans is at... 72%. Literally within 1% of difference in more than a year. What in the hell. Mirror Matchups work different | ||
|
Fuell
Netherlands3111 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:22 Rollora wrote: Hmm before I go into/watch the games: Were these macro games or was 2 of the Wins Bullshit Builds from our Guides here and 2 of them "protossed"? game 4 was great | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:22 Rollora wrote: Hmm before I go into/watch the games: Were these macro games or was 2 of the Wins Bullshit Builds from our Guides here and 2 of them "protossed"? There's plenty of bullshit, but PartinG's just on a whole 'nother level. It's not ambiguous. I was frustrated after he 2-0'd Maru, but tonight's display was just damn impressive (except for that WM). | ||
|
Elentos
55550 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:25 pure.Wasted wrote: From December till now, Life's ZvZ vs Koreans is at 72%, still 10% lower than PartinG's vT. From January of 2014 till now, Life's ZvZ vs Koreans is at... 72%. Literally within 1% of difference in more than a year. What in the hell. This percentage in a mirror MU is to be held in higher regard than a PvT winrate IMO. Mirrors have straight up build order losses and a lot more cheese. | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:27 Elentos wrote: This percentage in a mirror MU is to be held in higher regard than a PvT winrate IMO. Mirrors have straight up build order losses and a lot more cheese. Hey! PvT has plenty of straight up build order losses! ...for the Terran... | ||
|
Gwavajuice
France1810 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:22 pure.Wasted wrote: Sorry for the confusion guys, I could have been clearer. In the same timeframe, herO is 72% v Korean Terrans, a full 10% below PartinG's. Life's v Korean T is at 65%. Life vT is good cause it's Life and he's incredibly good in general, but IMHO he's not that good at this match up in particular, he's not as smart as when he's playing againt P for instance. Hyun as I think a better approach of the match up, even if he doesn't have the crazy mechanics of Life. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
I usually only look at winrates against koreans AND offline. You think online should be rated just as highly? | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
On March 11 2015 20:31 The_Red_Viper wrote: Ok cause we are talking about winrates here, how do you guys prefer to filter these? I usually only look at winrates against koreans AND offline. You think online should be rated just as highly? Well, without online, your sample size takes such a huge cut (within the relevant time frame for PartinG, at least). But I don't know, is there a compelling reason to disregard them? It's the same player pool. | ||
| ||
