|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
what is this "syndicate" song about i dont get it
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
KT Rolster Life looks pretty weird
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On February 13 2015 20:05 marvellosity wrote:
KT Rolster Life looks pretty weird
No kidding, I like it though
|
On February 13 2015 20:05 marvellosity wrote:
KT Rolster Life looks pretty weird
Just looks like a boss.
And why doesn't SK have a TCM shirt?^^
|
lol this is what happens when you only watch sc2 here and there. i'm like wtf Life not on ST anymore... wtf Soulkey not on SKT anymore... da fuck is TCM???
|
On February 13 2015 20:03 LoneYoShi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:59 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 19:56 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:53 TheDwf wrote:On February 13 2015 19:48 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:
Well Terran has gold base zerg is dead Brilliant call Well if terran just loses his whole army at the zergs fourth for like 15 banelings i guess he can still lose People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile it is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Don't put words in my mouth please. I have never said anything about the zerg side, I only reminded you that a terran army is fragile. If you have a problem with that statement, we can discuss it by MP, no need to derail the thread. Show nested quote +On February 13 2015 20:03 silentsaint wrote:On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:59 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 19:56 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:53 TheDwf wrote:On February 13 2015 19:48 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:
Well Terran has gold base zerg is dead Brilliant call Well if terran just loses his whole army at the zergs fourth for like 15 banelings i guess he can still lose People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile it is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Well, the terran is at fault too, for his slip up, so why shouldn't be the zerg at fault, for not spreading his army when the enemy has widow mines? Exactly.
There is a big difference between a micro mistake and not microing at all, he didn't even move his units there.
Expect better from the race with the best players ofcourse
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
Life does kinda look good in KT uniform. I can't wait till the next Telecom war ^_^
|
On February 13 2015 20:08 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2015 20:03 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:59 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 19:56 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:53 TheDwf wrote:On February 13 2015 19:48 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:
Well Terran has gold base zerg is dead Brilliant call Well if terran just loses his whole army at the zergs fourth for like 15 banelings i guess he can still lose People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile it is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Don't put words in my mouth please. I have never said anything about the zerg side, I only reminded you that a terran army is fragile. If you have a problem with that statement, we can discuss it by MP, no need to derail the thread. On February 13 2015 20:03 silentsaint wrote:On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:59 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 19:56 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:53 TheDwf wrote:On February 13 2015 19:48 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:
Well Terran has gold base zerg is dead Brilliant call Well if terran just loses his whole army at the zergs fourth for like 15 banelings i guess he can still lose People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile it is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Well, the terran is at fault too, for his slip up, so why shouldn't be the zerg at fault, for not spreading his army when the enemy has widow mines? Exactly. There is a big difference between a micro mistake and not microing at all, he didn't even move his units there. Expect better from the race with the best players ofcourse
There is no P in this group.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I look forward to seeing Hephaistas' name crop up in ABL sometime
|
there are a million interesting things happening in the opening and they talk about fucking anything, back to korean stream
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On February 13 2015 20:09 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2015 20:08 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 20:03 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:59 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 19:56 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:53 TheDwf wrote:On February 13 2015 19:48 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:
Well Terran has gold base zerg is dead Brilliant call Well if terran just loses his whole army at the zergs fourth for like 15 banelings i guess he can still lose People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile it is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Don't put words in my mouth please. I have never said anything about the zerg side, I only reminded you that a terran army is fragile. If you have a problem with that statement, we can discuss it by MP, no need to derail the thread. On February 13 2015 20:03 silentsaint wrote:On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:59 LoneYoShi wrote:On February 13 2015 19:56 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:On February 13 2015 19:53 TheDwf wrote:On February 13 2015 19:48 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:
Well Terran has gold base zerg is dead Brilliant call Well if terran just loses his whole army at the zergs fourth for like 15 banelings i guess he can still lose People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile it is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Well, the terran is at fault too, for his slip up, so why shouldn't be the zerg at fault, for not spreading his army when the enemy has widow mines? Exactly. There is a big difference between a micro mistake and not microing at all, he didn't even move his units there. Expect better from the race with the best players ofcourse There is no P in this group.
they died to random lings.
|
On February 13 2015 20:09 marvellosity wrote:
I look forward to seeing Hephaistas' name crop up in ABL sometime
Hahaha yeah, wonder how long it will take
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Is Life just going to die to a lot of roaches?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Im sad that the meta went back to roach v roach
|
Being not terran bias means people want you banned 
|
On February 13 2015 20:14 stuchiu wrote:
Im sad that the meta went back to roach v roach
You can never kill the roach-lover that lies in every Zerg.
|
On February 13 2015 20:14 mCon.Hephaistas wrote:Being not terran bias means people want you banned
You shall be honored as the great Zerg martyr, the one who had the courage to stand against the almighty Terran oppression
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
lol "getting those roaches at cosco" I laughed so hard
|
On February 13 2015 20:14 stuchiu wrote:
Im sad that the meta went back to roach v roach
Why? It's like BC mirrors in TvT, a spectacular clash of the highest technology available to your race
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
