EPT[Code S] Ro16 Group B Season 1 2015 - Page 17
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
polpot
3002 Posts
| ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
On February 13 2015 19:56 Keeemy wrote: TY's control and multitasking wasn't up to his usual level. Life vs SK gonna be good! Why would you expect that? Was their series at IEM closer than the 0-2 let on? | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On February 13 2015 19:57 Grizvok wrote: How do you lose that as TY? It was three base vs three base and one was a gold for the Terran. Micro and composition | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
 | ||
|
Grizvok
United States711 Posts
Heh with as long as that base was mining comfortably SK probably should've lost. | ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On February 13 2015 19:57 Undead1993 wrote: wow life has a terrible record against sk, still think he is going to 2:0 him ezpz in the current state If SK could go out first it'd be perfect (easier match for Inno + I've a bet that TY doesn't get out), but I don't have much hope | ||
|
LoneYoShi
France1348 Posts
On February 13 2015 19:56 mCon.Hephaistas wrote: Well if terran just loses his whole army at the zergs fourth for like 15 banelings i guess he can still lose People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile their army is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. | ||
|
Gwavajuice
France1810 Posts
it was at a bad patch for TvP though, and the defense added by the rocks ended up making it unplayable for Terrans, wonder how it would paly out today... There was a few good PvP on it though IIRC.. | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
| ||
|
rotta
5648 Posts
| ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7996 Posts
On February 13 2015 19:57 Grizvok wrote: How do you lose that as TY? It was three base vs three base and one was a gold for the Terran. string of bad decisions and engagements, especially donating 2 full medivacs right before he started engaging at the 4th of soulkey, there was really no reason to lose from the position he was in | ||
|
Fuell
Netherlands3111 Posts
| ||
|
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
On February 13 2015 19:59 LoneYoShi wrote: People are so used to see pristine army control from terrans that they often forget how fragile it is. One micro slip up and suddenly that "won game" is lost. But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On February 13 2015 19:58 Grizvok wrote: Heh with as long as that base was mining comfortably SK probably should've lost. No. Gold gives only +5% income compared with a normal base, is depleted quickly and is very exposed to counters | ||
|
silentsaint
Germany540 Posts
On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote: But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Well, the terran is at fault too, for his slip up, so why shouldn't be the zerg at fault, for not spreading his army when the enemy has widow mines? | ||
|
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
On February 13 2015 20:00 TheDwf wrote: No. Gold gives only +5% income compared with a normal base, is depleted quickly and is very exposed to counters Means you need less saturation though, so you are faster at max income, combine that with a slow zerg 4th. This was a throw | ||
|
LoneYoShi
France1348 Posts
On February 13 2015 20:00 mCon.Hephaistas wrote: But if zergs loses his army to some widow mines it's his own fault right? Don't put words in my mouth please. I have never said anything about the zerg side, I only reminded you that a terran army is fragile. If you have a problem with that statement, we can discuss it by MP, no need to derail the thread. On February 13 2015 20:03 silentsaint wrote: Well, the terran is at fault too, for his slip up, so why shouldn't be the zerg at fault, for not spreading his army when the enemy has widow mines? Exactly. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
| ||
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On February 13 2015 20:00 rotta wrote: This loud and obnoxious bwob bwob bwob every time... Are they trying to tune people out on purpose? Yes, that is exactly what they're trying to do. | ||
| ||
