|
On November 28 2014 06:02 Circumstance wrote: I like how none of us are dumb enough to attempt figuring out the potential outcomes of Group D. Snute can't advance I'm like 50% sure of that.
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
Pollt
Poll: Recommend MMA vs Polt Game 1?★- Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1) 13% ★★★- Good game (4) 50% ★★★★- Highly recommended game (3) 38% ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0) 0% 8 total votes Your vote: Recommend MMA vs Polt Game 1? (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season
|
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On November 28 2014 05:56 Xoronius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 05:52 Lorning wrote:On November 28 2014 05:51 Heartland wrote:On November 28 2014 05:50 Xoronius wrote:On November 28 2014 05:47 Heartland wrote:On November 28 2014 05:46 Xoronius wrote:On November 28 2014 05:43 Heartland wrote: And this is why the GSL system for groups is widely used : P Clarity for every single viewer should step behind fairness. Sadly, as you say, it doesn't. Anyway, it's hard to make a GSL-system-group with 5 players. They could have made five groups of four and then just not done the playoff bracket like they have. But that would mean, that a) GSL group system is used, which is generally a bad thing b) there would be either 10 or 15 players in the bracket. It is not possible, to make fair brackets with these numbers. a) why? b) What? There are playoff brackets made from gsl style groups all the time. Oh boy Xoronius vs GSL system coming up It's been too long I have not started this. I have been silent for so long, I have held myself back, but if people start attacking the only premier I have left, can you really blame me?
Yes TT
|
On November 28 2014 06:03 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 06:02 Circumstance wrote: I like how none of us are dumb enough to attempt figuring out the potential outcomes of Group D. Snute can't advance I'm like 50% sure of that.
Snute 2-0 jjakji and MMA beats Polt. I THINK snute advances no?
|
Pfffffffffft jjakji so greedy, pushing into the fourth like that. After that great engagement he could've just sit at the edge of creep until 2-2 and won.
|
On November 28 2014 06:03 KingofdaHipHop wrote: Snute 1-0 jjakji
ah ah ... the dream is real
|
ForGG is a trooper still staying in a lost cause.
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
ForGG turtling on 2 bases with turrets and making 4 thors at once
|
On November 28 2014 06:03 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 06:02 Circumstance wrote: I like how none of us are dumb enough to attempt figuring out the potential outcomes of Group D. Snute can't advance I'm like 50% sure of that. Pretty sure if Snute wins 2-0 vs jjakji, he advances. Just gotta win the next map, maybe he can do it!
|
On November 28 2014 06:03 KingofdaHipHop wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 06:02 Circumstance wrote: I like how none of us are dumb enough to attempt figuring out the potential outcomes of Group D. Snute can't advance I'm like 50% sure of that. Snute can advance, if he wins 2-0, he is 2-2/4-4, while Impact and Jjakji would both be at 2-2/5/6, so he can finish ahead of them.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
The 6 man tie scenario may come to fruition
|
What game are the crowd cheering for?
|
Let's be real people, it's impossible to mathematically figure this out.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On November 28 2014 06:05 Arnstein wrote: What game are the crowd cheering for?
CS
|
|
On November 28 2014 06:05 Arnstein wrote: What game are the crowd cheering for? NIP-LDLC
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On November 28 2014 06:06 Heartland wrote: Let's be real people, it's impossible to mathematically figure this out.
DIE4EVER WHERE YOU AT
|
|
On November 28 2014 06:05 Arnstein wrote: What game are the crowd cheering for?
They are chanting, in Swedish, "Tie-breakers, tie-breakers, tie-breakers!"
|
|
|
|