EPTSeemed like the quickest way to defuse the situation
[IEM] Grand Finals World Championships 2014 - Page 111
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
Seemed like the quickest way to defuse the situation | ||
|
DMXD
United States4064 Posts
the winner take all was a nice experiment but please never do it again..... | ||
|
zul
Germany5427 Posts
| ||
|
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:24 Rustug wrote: Actually I've played in a World Cup final (not StarCraft obv.). What's your claim to fame? Making assumptions about other people over the internet and generally shitty posts probably. | ||
|
crappen
Norway1546 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:20 Spec wrote: Protoss balance issues + PvP being non-entertaining might just be the perfect cocktail to kill something. You're right. I've never been away from the scene so long as of late. I watched Polt vs Hero yesterday by accident, and realized just how terrible painful it is to see SC2 right now. If I was in hell, I'd imagined myself being a professional Terran player. | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:23 stuchiu wrote: Well I had to write two articles about Duckdeok's and sOs' run at Blizzcon before anyone would even talk about it instead of Jaedong at Blizzcon. sOs beat the true champion in the ro4. He would obviously win Blizzcon. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18524 Posts
IEM only gets bad reputation, good job IEM? haha | ||
|
DaedricTV
United Kingdom94 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:25 Darkhorse wrote: Making assumptions about other people over the internet and generally shitty posts probably. Your posts are getting a little too bitter, can't we just be friends? | ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
| ||
|
Thrillz
4313 Posts
sOs is ONE RICH MOFO. Between blizz finals and this. $O$ | ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:23 Ragnarork wrote: Though I feel really bad for herO (and I was cheering for him), and though this final was by many standards quite poor (though not by the series planning one, sOs played that really well), I still think it was something to try out once. And I think this is the reason for which we got so many awesome games in the bracket, but in the current metagame with a lot of protoss, that could also lead (and it did) to such a final. So I wouldn't call that a disaster, but rather an experience with its drawbacks and its advantages. Because let's be honest. It's a shame, but if you want people to give it all, you got to put a lot of money on the table. Make it this "allin-ish", and you'll get some of the best SC2. I'm totally not in favor of doing this often, though. Once a year could be a good frequency. Except the games at IEM Cologne were just as good. There is no hard evidence that WTA produces better games because the players are trying 'harder'. Let say we have a tournament where the loser actually loses money, will the games be better? I don't believe so. | ||
|
Darksoldierr
Hungary2012 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:21 Slomo wrote: Game1: Proxy 2 gates in herOs base from sOs. Game2: Proxy 2 gates in herOs base from sOs. Game3: Blink all in from sOs, DTs from herO. sOs saw the DTs and ggd. No units were harmed in the progression of this game. Game4: Blind nexus first from sOs, herO with a 3 gate blink all in. All in failed due to a Robo sOs built. Game5: Failed proxy gate from herO. Took me longer to write down, than the games actually lasted. Atleast game 3 was really good, and both player could have won that till sOs cleared his base | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
| ||
covetousrat
2109 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:22 Koesader wrote: $O$ is the new Sniper T_T Lol s0s is now officiall $O$ | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Wasn't as much what MVP did as much as what MKP didn't do. Which was anything, he just kinda rolled over. | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:23 Ragnarork wrote: Because let's be honest. It's a shame, but if you want people to give it all, you got to put a lot of money on the table. Make it this "allin-ish", and you'll get some of the best SC2. These finals were more anti - SC2 than any finals I can remember. It is not like early WoL days when nobody knew how to play and what creep spread is. It was basically a ruthless "slaughter" for the money. And people who just kept looking at that viewer count should realize that at everything above 60-70k were probably not your regular SC2 viewers at all. | ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:26 sharkie wrote: So players didn't like WTA, fans didn't like WTA. IEM only gets bad reputation, good job IEM? haha dont say players and fans there was players liking it i liking it too (first kor vs kor final i watched since 2011) so plz dont generalize ! | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:26 DaedricTV wrote: Your posts are getting a little too bitter, can't we just be friends? You're not showing much understanding for how friendship usually works... | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On March 17 2014 01:23 Ragnarork wrote: Though I feel really bad for herO (and I was cheering for him), and though this final was by many standards quite poor (though not by the series planning one, sOs played that really well), I still think it was something to try out once. And I think this is the reason for which we got so many awesome games in the bracket, but in the current metagame with a lot of protoss, that could also lead (and it did) to such a final. So I wouldn't call that a disaster, but rather an experience with its drawbacks and its advantages. Because let's be honest. It's a shame, but if you want people to give it all, you got to put a lot of money on the table. Make it this "allin-ish", and you'll get some of the best SC2. I'm totally not in favor of doing this often, though. Once a year could be a good frequency. IEM cologne games were just as good imo and a better final. Players will try just as hard for 40k as for 100k. | ||
| ||
