• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:39
CEST 08:39
KST 15:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3
Community News
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!29Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week4Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles2GSTL Returns in 2026!45Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7
StarCraft 2
General
Starcraft2 player guess game is Coming~! How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week SC4ALL II: SC2 Player Announcement 6/8 - Maru PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey!
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) WORTEX 2026 - Hungarian SC2 Finals Budapest
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 540 Dodge This The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome Mutation # 538 Media Blackout
Brood War
General
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! [ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call Farewell Beloved Starcraft (Youtube Videos) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro24 Group F [ASL22] Ro24 Group E [ASL22] Ro24 Group D Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Replay Review Process - What do you do? Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
What Jewelry Makes the Best Gift for a Special Occ US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
The Creator Fan Club MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Young Players Exit Esports E…
TrAiDoS
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7028 users

[Code A] Group K Season 1 2014 - Page 26

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 56 Next
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
January 24 2014 11:01 GMT
#501
Hydra needs to play a 3rd series so he could go for the worst game 1 combined performance of all time. 2 bops so far
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
Waise
Profile Joined June 2013
3165 Posts
January 24 2014 11:01 GMT
#502
On January 24 2014 19:59 Glorfindel! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.


Sources on this?
Its quite easy to write "win rates favoured Terran" but I remember the win rates as being 50%, I am not sure though. Would be nice if you provided statistics.

the source is my memory, i don't care to prove it or argue it because the actual point i was making was in the words i typed, not the statistic as i remember it... going back to bio mine in choke points pre-nerf would be enough to make me switch to protoss lol
gingerfluffmuff
Profile Joined January 2011
Austria4570 Posts
January 24 2014 11:01 GMT
#503
On January 24 2014 19:58 Shellshock wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 19:58 bo1b wrote:

How could you forget about this khaldor

this is the one I was thinking of

Thx for the video, i missed the game completely :D
・゚✧:・゚+..。✧・゚:・..。 ✧・゚ :・゚ ゜・:・ ✧・゚:・゚:.。 ✧・゚ SPARKULING *・゜・:・゚✧:・゚✧。゚+..。 ✧・゚: ✧・゚:・゜・:・゚✧::・・:・゚・゚
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
January 24 2014 11:02 GMT
#504
[Code A] Group K GSL S1 2014
[image loading] (Z)Hydra vs. [image loading] (Z)TRUE
Game 2 (0-1)
Map: Yeonsu

0:00
Hydra spawns in the top right
TRUE spawns in the bottom left
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
January 24 2014 11:02 GMT
#505
On January 24 2014 19:57 Glorfindel! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason


To make more interesting room for Siege Tanks in the TvZ Match Up. That was the reason and yet we have not seen a single tank produced if Terran is not miles ahead. Or if TY is abusing them on Yeonseu (and being miles ahead).


So stupid. Why change WMs if you're not sure whether Tanks will become useful? If the Tanks are built a lot, then fewer mines will be built as a matter of course, because they come from the same building and cost gas. Tanks would have naturally phased mines out of the game.

TRUE! I believe.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
January 24 2014 11:02 GMT
#506
On January 24 2014 20:01 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 20:00 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.

Biomine vs muta/ling/bling is insanely snowbally, but still imo the most balanced and demanding match up in sc2 history


I dunno. I think old school Marine/Tank vs Old school Ling/Bling/Muta was more balanced.

I think before drg showed that it was possible if you were fast enough to win as zerg you're probably right, but post that winrates were pretty spot on 50/50.
Dinotramp
Profile Joined August 2012
Nauru2871 Posts
January 24 2014 11:02 GMT
#507
Is True really going to top this group? Holy shit.
RIP Starcraft scene in the UK. Defeated by EG money and Swedish Zergs.
Glorfindel!
Profile Joined May 2011
Sweden1815 Posts
January 24 2014 11:03 GMT
#508
On January 24 2014 20:01 Waise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 19:59 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.


Sources on this?
Its quite easy to write "win rates favoured Terran" but I remember the win rates as being 50%, I am not sure though. Would be nice if you provided statistics.

the source is my memory, i don't care to prove it or argue it because the actual point i was making was in the words i typed, not the statistic as i remember it... going back to bio mine in choke points pre-nerf would be enough to make me switch to protoss lol


Well that is a great source.. Ehhh.
http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/598681/1/Glorfindel/ladder/161337#current-rank
discator
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany639 Posts
January 24 2014 11:03 GMT
#509
BaneLingKingPrime
;;
fx9
Profile Joined November 2013
117 Posts
January 24 2014 11:03 GMT
#510
Mutas and overlord speed were initially buffed to help Zerg against bio+WM.
With WM nerf, why should it stays as it is now?
Mutas are just too good of an unit across all MU currently.
Waise
Profile Joined June 2013
3165 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-24 11:05:29
January 24 2014 11:03 GMT
#511
On January 24 2014 20:00 bo1b wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.

Biomine vs muta/ling/bling is insanely snowbally, but still imo the most balanced and demanding match up in sc2 history

never understood that. to me it's the least "snowbally" matchup. most matchups are 1 engagement and then the snowball is instantly an avalanche. the fact that it's "snowballing" at all instead of "instant gg" is a credit to the matchup IMO. but that's just my opinion

On January 24 2014 20:03 fx9 wrote:
Mutas and overlord speed were initially buffed to help Zerg against bio+WM.
With WM nerf, why should it stays as it is now?
Mutas are just too good of an unit across all MU currently.

overseer speed buff was really more about not instantly losing every single overseer to stimmed marines if you ever have to retreat from a fight. the utility it added to muta vs mine probably went a little too far, but i still like being able to have detection with the mutas. i just think mutas should be a little weaker against mines. too easy to snipe them
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
January 24 2014 11:04 GMT
#512
On January 24 2014 20:03 Glorfindel! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 20:01 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:59 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.


Sources on this?
Its quite easy to write "win rates favoured Terran" but I remember the win rates as being 50%, I am not sure though. Would be nice if you provided statistics.

the source is my memory, i don't care to prove it or argue it because the actual point i was making was in the words i typed, not the statistic as i remember it... going back to bio mine in choke points pre-nerf would be enough to make me switch to protoss lol


Well that is a great source.. Ehhh.

He's kind of right though, when a few mines were set up in a choke point it became insanely hard to break out as zerg
Glorfindel!
Profile Joined May 2011
Sweden1815 Posts
January 24 2014 11:05 GMT
#513
On January 24 2014 20:04 bo1b wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 20:03 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 20:01 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:59 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.


Sources on this?
Its quite easy to write "win rates favoured Terran" but I remember the win rates as being 50%, I am not sure though. Would be nice if you provided statistics.

the source is my memory, i don't care to prove it or argue it because the actual point i was making was in the words i typed, not the statistic as i remember it... going back to bio mine in choke points pre-nerf would be enough to make me switch to protoss lol


Well that is a great source.. Ehhh.

He's kind of right though, when a few mines were set up in a choke point it became insanely hard to break out as zerg


I am not arguing about that at all. Im just saying that claiming that "win rates favoured Terran" and then saying "I dont have sources, just my head" is a bit weird way to argue.
http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/598681/1/Glorfindel/ladder/161337#current-rank
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-24 11:06:40
January 24 2014 11:05 GMT
#514
On January 24 2014 20:03 Waise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 20:00 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.

Biomine vs muta/ling/bling is insanely snowbally, but still imo the most balanced and demanding match up in sc2 history

never understood that. to me it's the least "snowbally" matchup. most matchups are 1 engagement and then the snowball is instantly an avalanche. the fact that it's "snowballing" at all instead of "instant gg" is a credit to the matchup IMO. but that's just my opinion

I suppose, it's just it only really took one/two bad engagements and your opponent just rolls over you 5 minutes later

edit: You're completely right, we've all seen roach/hydra vs collosus and know just how fast a game can end
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
January 24 2014 11:05 GMT
#515
On January 24 2014 20:02 Shellshock wrote:
[Code A] Group K GSL S1 2014
[image loading] (Z)Hydra vs. [image loading] (Z)TRUE
Game 2 (0-1)
Map: Yeonsu

0:00
Hydra spawns in the top right
TRUE spawns in the bottom left

2:00
pool first for both players
Hatch first both players

3:00
drones and scouting lings
queens

4:00
TRUE gets a ling in Hydra's base to scout and sees no gas

5:00
spine in the natural for Hydra
scouting lings of Hydra are denied
double gas for both players
3rd gas for Hydra
Roach warren for Hydra
evo for Hydra
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
Dinotramp
Profile Joined August 2012
Nauru2871 Posts
January 24 2014 11:05 GMT
#516
RIP Starcraft scene in the UK. Defeated by EG money and Swedish Zergs.
Waise
Profile Joined June 2013
3165 Posts
January 24 2014 11:06 GMT
#517
On January 24 2014 20:05 Glorfindel! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 20:04 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 20:03 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 20:01 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:59 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.


Sources on this?
Its quite easy to write "win rates favoured Terran" but I remember the win rates as being 50%, I am not sure though. Would be nice if you provided statistics.

the source is my memory, i don't care to prove it or argue it because the actual point i was making was in the words i typed, not the statistic as i remember it... going back to bio mine in choke points pre-nerf would be enough to make me switch to protoss lol


Well that is a great source.. Ehhh.

He's kind of right though, when a few mines were set up in a choke point it became insanely hard to break out as zerg


I am not arguing about that at all. Im just saying that claiming that "win rates favoured Terran" and then saying "I dont have sources, just my head" is a bit weird way to argue.
what do you want me to do? i answered honestly. i don't have a source. i might be wrong. should i delete all my posts because i made a comment based on memory? i don't keep liquipedia tabs open 24/7 in case i get into a discussion on the forums...
Orek
Profile Joined February 2012
1665 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-24 11:08:37
January 24 2014 11:07 GMT
#518
On January 24 2014 20:05 Dinotramp wrote:
https://twitter.com/uThermal/status/426671768825131009

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/David_Kim
gingerfluffmuff
Profile Joined January 2011
Austria4570 Posts
January 24 2014 11:07 GMT
#519
On January 24 2014 20:06 Waise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 24 2014 20:05 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 20:04 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 20:03 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 20:01 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:59 Glorfindel! wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:58 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:56 bo1b wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:54 Waise wrote:
On January 24 2014 19:51 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Mutas are retarded, as long as they stay the way they are there will be almost no terran that wins with bio vs zerg -.-
And that comes from a zerg player (though it is not really important, everybody can see this i think^^)


i wonder how the MU would play out if widow mines activated faster? the overseer speed buff, while great, made widow mines really pathetic against mutas. with the reduced blast damage i think faster mines might keep the matchup interesting. not sure exactly how it would change mine dragging/mine spread or if it would buff zerg on the ground... zerg needs mutas but i definitely see how the huge balls can be a problem for any terran who falls even slightly behind

tvz was perfectly balanced until they nerfed widowmines for god knows what reason

winrates favored terran and bio mine camping a choke point outside a 4th base was ridiculous. pre-nerf mines are not the way to fix the matchup again, that would be a terrible regression. 3/3 alone means bio mine is still fine against ling bling on the ground, but mutas are a bigger problem now as terrans have observed.


Sources on this?
Its quite easy to write "win rates favoured Terran" but I remember the win rates as being 50%, I am not sure though. Would be nice if you provided statistics.

the source is my memory, i don't care to prove it or argue it because the actual point i was making was in the words i typed, not the statistic as i remember it... going back to bio mine in choke points pre-nerf would be enough to make me switch to protoss lol


Well that is a great source.. Ehhh.

He's kind of right though, when a few mines were set up in a choke point it became insanely hard to break out as zerg


I am not arguing about that at all. Im just saying that claiming that "win rates favoured Terran" and then saying "I dont have sources, just my head" is a bit weird way to argue.
what do you want me to do? i answered honestly. i don't have a source. i might be wrong. should i delete all my posts because i made a comment based on memory? i don't keep liquipedia tabs open 24/7 in case i get into a discussion on the forums...

You dont have a second screen for the pedia?
・゚✧:・゚+..。✧・゚:・..。 ✧・゚ :・゚ ゜・:・ ✧・゚:・゚:.。 ✧・゚ SPARKULING *・゜・:・゚✧:・゚✧。゚+..。 ✧・゚: ✧・゚:・゜・:・゚✧::・・:・゚・゚
Lorning *
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Belgica34432 Posts
January 24 2014 11:08 GMT
#520
Hydra....
Community News
TL+ Member
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2026 GSTL: Main Stage Day 2
Discussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft582
ProTech138
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 1759
GuemChi 1204
Leta 142
Dewaltoss 69
Bale 24
ZergMaN 13
firebathero 0
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm174
League of Legends
JimRising 649
Counter-Strike
summit1g4837
m0e_tv504
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King290
Other Games
C9.Mang0157
Livibee134
Happy83
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV51
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH346
• practicex 50
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2233
League of Legends
• Rush1284
• Lourlo1069
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
3h 21m
Replay Cast
17h 21m
Escore
1d 3h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 4h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 19h
GSL
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 22: Qualifier 1
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
META DYMY #4

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL Season 22: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 6
Light Tournament 2026
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

BSL 2026 LAN: Kraków
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Calamity Invitational
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.