[Up/Down] Group E WCS Korea 2013 Season 3 - Page 3
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
![]()
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
liberate71
Australia10252 Posts
On August 13 2013 22:46 DrPandaPhD wrote: Bad analogy it would be more like: Playing in the Football League Championship (level 2 in UK soccer) and qualify for Premier league (level 1). But then end up in La Liga (Spains premier league). Leenock played in GOMs up and down. Qualified to Code S. And then ended up in OSL. It's a GOMTV award for consistent appearances in a GOMTV run tournament. OnGameNet is not GOMTV It's a shame, but its pretty clear. It's like calling IPL and MLG the same thing. | ||
Strat4lyfe
Singapore133 Posts
![]() | ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On August 13 2013 23:49 DrPandaPhD wrote: No it's not a totally different issue, it's what happened? Qualify through level 2 -> level 1. But then end up in a totally different league. If the Fotball / Soccer commitee chose to make whoever qualified through the Football League Championship got into La Liga instead of premier league that's exactly how it would have been. In the end Leenock just got fucked by higher powers. As in your own words, OSL just hijacked Code S. The only player who will have played 10 seasons in a row and not get rewarded for it. If you would count months of top level: Leenock was in Code S for 22months (you can make it 20 if you want to remove WCS Season 2, still more than Nestea) Mvp did it for 20months in a row Nestea was in Code S for 19months when he got the award. (He did another season after) Also note that Leenock did it through another game into HotS which is also increases the difficulty level. In the end he has been more consistant than Nestea. And the Nestea award is an award for consistancy. Fuck logic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Who cares about what he has done compare to Nestea, Nestea award is "Participate In 10 consecutive code S", not some other vague definition which may or may not suggest someone as more deserving. It's a "Yes"/"No" question and not something that's debated. If you want a reward for "consistency" or "participate in 10 straight premier league seasons", then create such an award but don't make Nestea award something it's not and never meant to be. | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On August 14 2013 03:19 Shellshock1122 wrote: I like MKP, Curious, and Dear. :/ I hope MKP puts up a good showing I want MKP and Curisou too :O Time to post my Curious memes =D | ||
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On August 14 2013 00:55 liberate71 wrote: It's a GOMTV award for consistent appearances in a GOMTV run tournament. OnGameNet is not GOMTV It's a shame, but its pretty clear. It's like calling IPL and MLG the same thing. More like calling WCS NA season 1 (held by MLG) and WCS NA season 2 (held by NASL) the same tournament. Oh wait ppl do that | ||
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
Does NASL call WCS NA season 2 NASL? No Does GOM call WCS KR season 1 GSL? Yes Does OnGameNet call WCS KR season 2 OSL? Yes Why are you trying to arbitrarily define things but without the power to do so when they already arbitrarily defined things within their power? | ||
![]()
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
| ||
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On August 14 2013 04:03 ragz_gt wrote: Does MLG call WCS NA season 1 MLG? No Does NASL call WCS NA season 2 NASL? No Does GOM call WCS KR season 1 GSL? Yes Does OnGameNet call WCS KR season 2 OSL? Yes Why are you trying to arbitrarily define things but without the power to do so when they already arbitrarily defined things within their power? Because they wanted to keep their names yes, but in the end both are WCS Korea. Oh well that is not rly my point. Still my point is: IF Blizzard had not decided to make the WCS system, or even delay it ONE season. Leenock would have gotten the award. I don't see how you can argue with that? And that means he got fucked by powers he could not prevent. He did it 10 seasons in a row. And the last time I checked 10 = 10. (this might be out of date + I dont have a reliable source for 10 = 10. If recent math studies has proven that 10 = 9 I guess I will accept defeat in the argument) | ||
Elite_
United States4259 Posts
| ||
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On August 14 2013 04:42 Elite_ wrote: It's obvious that this blatant Leenock fanboy won't shut up about this until everyone else does. Just stop replying to him and he won't annoy you about it any more. It's not like you have to read if you don't want to. Also why so hostile? So people can't have opinions and argue for them? As long as it stays civil I don't really see the problem? What if Obama had the same attitude as you. "Blatant opposite party fan so I guess I will stop replying to him until he won't annoy me anymore." "ok" | ||
MrMotionPicture
United States4327 Posts
| ||
![]()
opterown
![]()
Australia54784 Posts
| ||
ShowTheLights
Korea (South)1677 Posts
| ||
Negius
Netherlands290 Posts
And when I watch the VOD's tomorrow I will see your victorious smile after getting the Nestea award. A man can dream, right. | ||
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
Zenbrez
Canada5973 Posts
Rooting for Roro, MKP, Dear, in that order. | ||
Zenbrez
Canada5973 Posts
On August 14 2013 04:41 DrPandaPhD wrote: Because they wanted to keep their names yes, but in the end both are WCS Korea. Oh well that is not rly my point. Still my point is: IF Blizzard had not decided to make the WCS system, or even delay it ONE season. Leenock would have gotten the award. I don't see how you can argue with that? And that means he got fucked by powers he could not prevent. He did it 10 seasons in a row. And the last time I checked 10 = 10. (this might be out of date + I dont have a reliable source for 10 = 10. If recent math studies has proven that 10 = 9 I guess I will accept defeat in the argument) Your point is an "IF" scenario? Those are literally the most irrelevent scenarios. I've never seen someone so upset over something as minut. You've been bitching about this for days. Get over it, it's not going to change. You complaining to people on TL forums isn't going to make him get a novelty title. | ||
M.R. McThundercrotch
United States265 Posts
On August 14 2013 04:03 ragz_gt wrote: Why are you trying to arbitrarily define things but without the power to do so when they already arbitrarily defined things within their power? Because he is a blind fanboy in the throes of nerd rage. Arguing with him is pointless. | ||
| ||