EPTALL IPL5 Information - Page 7
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
yrt123
Singapore1246 Posts
| ||
|
yrt123
Singapore1246 Posts
On November 15 2012 11:04 JtoK wrote: GSL World Championship Korea Qualification Winners! OMG! ALL GSL Code S WINNERS! Holy SHIT :D I believe World Champ Korean players are simply selected based off their GSL Rankings. | ||
|
MistaBlue
37 Posts
| ||
|
FuzzyJAM
Scotland9300 Posts
| ||
|
Dismay
United States1180 Posts
| ||
|
GohgamX
Canada1096 Posts
| ||
|
Freezd
United States139 Posts
| ||
|
Render
United States249 Posts
| ||
|
4ZakeN87
Sweden1071 Posts
That is kind of cool if that was the case! Maybe just me but their seems to be a trend of companies being more open an interacting with communities more as of late. | ||
|
Wounded31
124 Posts
| ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8320 Posts
| ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
| ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
| ||
|
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On November 15 2012 13:06 teddyoojo wrote: unfair finals AGAIN wth No, double elim tourneys always have the fairest finals. However, they also are the most anticlimatic due to the winner's advantage, but they need to be given an advantage for not losing a set. | ||
|
jobber123rd
United States501 Posts
On November 15 2012 13:06 teddyoojo wrote: unfair finals AGAIN wth Winners Bracket player going LLLLWW to win the tournament incoming. Probably won't happen, but part of me really wants to see it just for the community's reaction. On November 15 2012 13:14 Canucklehead wrote: No, double elim tourneys always have the fairest finals. However, they also are the most anticlimatic due to the winner's advantage, but they need to be given an advantage for not losing a set. There are ways of giving an advantage while still retaining "tension" in the grand finals from the outset. The MLG non-rematch format where they go from Bo3 (or 5) starting at 0-0 to extended Bo7 (or 9) if the Losers Bracket player wins gives the Winners Bracket player a clear advantage, but still requires the WB player to win the most games in the overall confrontation (almost as if it were a straight-up series) -- something you don't get even with a simple 1-0 WB advantage in a BoX series (which, by the way, would have been a greater reduction of advantage (compared to starting at 2-0) than what they decided to use). | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
Good players list: Check! Good venue: Check! No antiga in the map pool: Check! The only thing that I think could've been better is the grand final format, as I've would've prefered a second Bo5 if the person from the loosers bracket wins the first one, but whatever, this is still going to be good. Seriously, that has a chance to become better than WCS EU | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
Also hoping to find out who that IM invite is going to be. | ||
|
sGvSpLiT
Canada10 Posts
 | ||
|
jobber123rd
United States501 Posts
On November 15 2012 13:52 WindWolf wrote: The only thing that I think could've been better is the grand final format, as I've would've prefered a second Bo5 if the person from the loosers bracket wins the first one, but whatever, this is still going to be good. That's what they had at IPL 4, and viewers didn't seem to be happy with the way that turned out (from what I read in the LR thread and chat). So (it seems that) they're looking to do something else. The number of games played might have been a factor in their original plan (trying to reduce the maximum number of games in the grand finals by half, from 10 to 5). | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On November 15 2012 14:08 jobber123rd wrote: That's what they had at IPL 4, and viewers didn't seem to be happy with the way that turned out (from what I read in the LR thread and chat). So (it seems that) they're looking to do something else. The number of games played might have been a factor in their original plan (trying to reduce the maximum number of games in the grand finals by half, from 10 to 5). If you are running a double-elimination tournament, you must make it so that that the LB-player has to win 2 series in order to win (Otherwise it isn't a double elimination tournament, as the double elimination principle doesn't apply to the UP-winner), but I don't see the point of reducing the length of the second series in the grand final. | ||
| ||
