|
VOD IF YOU MISSED IT http://www.twitch.tv/samsc2/b/330876656
Poll: Who will win! Match 1Evil Geniuses (46) 78% Killing Spree (13) 22% 59 total votes Your vote: Who will win! Match 1 (Vote): Evil Geniuses (Vote): Killing Spree
Poll: Who will win! Match 2Dust (10) 56% Crown (8) 44% 18 total votes Your vote: Who will win! Match 2 (Vote): Crown (Vote): Dust
|
Crown Gaming > Dust
Hoping Ks wins this one, but EG is very powerful!
|
Canada1169 Posts
|
The games should Def be amazing
|
I'm not sure who's going to be my co caster....anyone wanna try? Spacewhales might be busy so I'm not sure!!
|
I'm around for a couple hours but some family is in town for dinner; so I can do the first match if that works for you, and then replace me for the 2nd event.
|
I like DuSt gaming's logo so much <3<3
|
On September 02 2012 10:01 WhalesFromSpace wrote: I'm around for a couple hours but some family is in town for dinner; so I can do the first match if that works for you, and then replace me for the 2nd event. Yeah that works for me! Not sure who else is available though.
|
Wait shouldn't ESEA be on to week 3 by now? Is this cast from replays?
|
|
On September 03 2012 01:33 HeeroFX wrote: EG will own it up Were gonna have to see!
|
|
Alright, whoever voted for KS did so out of spite. Not saying KS is bad, but EG has HuK, Thorzain and some other players that have enough skill to allkill lesser known teams. Say what you will about EG's collective slump in results, but we're talking about world class players here like motherfucking HuK. This is going to end badly for KS.
|
On September 03 2012 03:13 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote: Alright, whoever voted for KS did so out of spite. Not saying KS is bad, but EG has HuK, Thorzain and some other players that have enough skill to allkill lesser known teams. Say what you will about EG's collective slump in results, but we're talking about world class players here like motherfucking HuK. This is going to end badly for KS. meh even if its like inc lz machine, then still 2 slots
|
Both EG and Crown will win. The only way EG will lose is if they play their american players and they just so happen to not be in the mood to play, which does happen, but in a professional setting it shouldnt
And regarding the talk about huk, hes been playing more LoL than starcraft so hes not even in top form
Then DuSt wIlL LoSe beCauSe they have ToO manY playErS whO do ThiS with TheiR NameS
|
On September 03 2012 03:46 Burns wrote: Both EG and Crown will win. The only way EG will lose is if they play their american players and they just so happen to not be in the mood to play, which does happen, but in a professional setting it shouldnt
And regarding the talk about huk, hes been playing more LoL than starcraft so hes not even in top form
Then DuSt wIlL LoSe beCauSe they have ToO manY playErS whO do ThiS with TheiR NameS Haha I'm always impartial because of being a caster but you are very right about the NaMeS lIkE tHiS it sometimes gets annoying especially when I gotta make posts about them and I try to keep their name proper during the entire post...
|
On September 03 2012 03:46 Burns wrote:
Then DuSt wIlL LoSe beCauSe they have ToO manY playErS whO do ThiS with TheiR NameS
High level analysis :D
|
|
I'm lagging so much. Is there a way to lower the quality?
|
does anyone have an update of the specific player matchups going on?
|
Hey Sam, can you add a spoiler for the results and the lineups in the OP next time? Thanks
|
Why would you 10 pool on tda? Isn't 14/14 baneling all in still the most common build on TDA.
I guess to be fair no zerg ever plays on the map.
edit: nvm other zerg goofed it
|
|
I wish there was a quality selection option on the stream...
as is it lags too much for me to watch
|
where can i find results?
|
On September 03 2012 07:17 Hazuc wrote:I'm lagging so much. Is there a way to lower the quality?  I'm really sorry! I don't have that ability to lower the quality in the future i'm really trying to get it
|
On September 03 2012 07:17 KoDo wrote: does anyone have an update of the specific player matchups going on? I'll be posting that up asap sorry for not having it any earlier been a busy busy week!
|
On September 03 2012 07:21 Bagration wrote: Hey Sam, can you add a spoiler for the results and the lineups in the OP next time? Thanks Yeah I generally setup the matches/lineups/results after the cast is finished
|
On September 03 2012 12:51 nkr wrote: where can i find results? i'll be updating this all asap
|
Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format
|
On September 03 2012 14:40 JollYRoGeR wrote: Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format awesome! thanks for your input. Final score was 3-1 EG and I feel like my thread is fairly easy to read i'm sorry you feel that way.
|
On September 03 2012 14:49 Samsc2 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 14:40 JollYRoGeR wrote: Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format awesome! thanks for your input. Final score was 3-1 EG and I feel like my thread is fairly easy to read i'm sorry you feel that way.
it actually should be 4-0 for eg as they dropped one GAME, not a set..why does eg go 3-0 after going 6-0 in games, but when they go 2-1 in the last 3 games the score is 3-1 instead of 4-0?
also it is super stupid format and annoying to read, just post 2-0 instead of 50 lines with 1-0
|
On September 03 2012 15:30 diablo3guy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 14:49 Samsc2 wrote:On September 03 2012 14:40 JollYRoGeR wrote: Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format awesome! thanks for your input. Final score was 3-1 EG and I feel like my thread is fairly easy to read i'm sorry you feel that way. it actually should be 4-0 for eg as they dropped one GAME, not a set..why does eg go 3-0 after going 6-0 in games, but when they go 2-1 in the last 3 games the score is 3-1 instead of 4-0? ...wrong
|
On September 03 2012 15:30 diablo3guy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 14:49 Samsc2 wrote:On September 03 2012 14:40 JollYRoGeR wrote: Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format awesome! thanks for your input. Final score was 3-1 EG and I feel like my thread is fairly easy to read i'm sorry you feel that way. it actually should be 4-0 for eg as they dropped one GAME, not a set..why does eg go 3-0 after going 6-0 in games, but when they go 2-1 in the last 3 games the score is 3-1 instead of 4-0? also it is super stupid format and annoying to read, just post 2-0 instead of 50 lines with 1-0
Machine lost the last set 2-1 so overall its 3-1.
|
On September 03 2012 15:30 diablo3guy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 14:49 Samsc2 wrote:On September 03 2012 14:40 JollYRoGeR wrote: Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format awesome! thanks for your input. Final score was 3-1 EG and I feel like my thread is fairly easy to read i'm sorry you feel that way. it actually should be 4-0 for eg as they dropped one GAME, not a set..why does eg go 3-0 after going 6-0 in games, but when they go 2-1 in the last 3 games the score is 3-1 instead of 4-0? also it is super stupid format and annoying to read, just post 2-0 instead of 50 lines with 1-0 Well seeing as how its based off of each game and map I felt it was better to put the match and score per if you don't like it you could always not read it and just watch the vod instead.
|
Sigh, Machine T_T also the rest was a complete beatdown and sam you really ought to think about getting a legit OP (aka steal from opterown's lr resources thread)
|
On September 03 2012 16:09 aRyuujin wrote: Sigh, Machine T_T also the rest was a complete beatdown and sam you really ought to think about getting a legit OP (aka steal from opterown's lr resources thread) I'm sorry! I'm not really understanding what you mean by legit op
|
Thread looks great! Was surprised to see EG drop a set...Machine needs to pick it up!!
|
On September 03 2012 16:10 Samsc2 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 16:09 aRyuujin wrote: Sigh, Machine T_T also the rest was a complete beatdown and sam you really ought to think about getting a legit OP (aka steal from opterown's lr resources thread) I'm sorry! I'm not really understanding what you mean by legit op
Look at the really nice LR threads, you should have formatting like that. Having a really nice OP can generate a lot more viewership for your events.
|
On September 03 2012 16:21 aRyuujin wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 16:10 Samsc2 wrote:On September 03 2012 16:09 aRyuujin wrote: Sigh, Machine T_T also the rest was a complete beatdown and sam you really ought to think about getting a legit OP (aka steal from opterown's lr resources thread) I'm sorry! I'm not really understanding what you mean by legit op Look at the really nice LR threads, you should have formatting like that. Having a really nice OP can generate a lot more viewership for your events. Would you like to help me setup something like that?
|
On September 03 2012 14:49 Samsc2 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 14:40 JollYRoGeR wrote: Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format awesome! thanks for your input. Final score was 3-1 EG and I feel like my thread is fairly easy to read i'm sorry you feel that way. I didn't mean the whole thread, just the results in the spoiler. Didn't mean to sound so mean
|
Sigh, Machine... sigh....
|
On September 03 2012 16:10 Samsc2 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 16:09 aRyuujin wrote: Sigh, Machine T_T also the rest was a complete beatdown and sam you really ought to think about getting a legit OP (aka steal from opterown's lr resources thread) I'm sorry! I'm not really understanding what you mean by legit op I think people are looking for more distinct categorizing of information. The other guy who mentioned the guide / resource thread is correct about how some of the banners there can make it easier for someone to locate and derive the information they need; I'll show you the page tomorrow on skype or something. I like how you have stopped using multiple font sizes in the intro paragraph but I also offer the following tips: -The polls come before the any intro or context to the match is offered; I would recommend placing them after teams/players/formats are conveyed, or putting them in a spoiler if at the top. -Color usage is inconsistent: "Event 1" is green but "Event 2" is blue, and blue is also being used for the results such that "Event 2" is harder to distinguish. -Results are a bit difficult to look at: Try using the GSL format where it looks kind of like this:
+ Show Spoiler +
I'll happily help you out with formatting threads or making a template for future events.
Thanks again to everyone who watched and gave feedback.
|
You could ask Seeker for some formatting advice, he gets shit done in a nice fashion
Feel sorry for Machine, he's a good player but he's in a spot where he hasn't got much confidence, hopefully when he strings together some wins and confidence he'll go back to a consistancy of play
|
On September 03 2012 16:24 JollYRoGeR wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2012 14:49 Samsc2 wrote:On September 03 2012 14:40 JollYRoGeR wrote: Result should be 4-0 to EG. Also very annoying to read. Look at like, every other thread and copy that format awesome! thanks for your input. Final score was 3-1 EG and I feel like my thread is fairly easy to read i'm sorry you feel that way. I didn't mean the whole thread, just the results in the spoiler. Didn't mean to sound so mean  it's fine I just can never tell when people are truly not interested in my stuff or not....or if they just want to yell at me about something haha
|
|
|
|