EPT
[Day 2] IEM Cologne 2012 - Groups A&B - Page 150
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
| ||
|
Grampz
United States2147 Posts
On August 17 2012 02:02 oogieogie wrote: that is why i like seeing mothership/gateway units instead of carriers..people underestimate how good blink stalkers are vs broodlords. I mean it was 59 stalkers vs 17 broodlords > 0 broodlords with like 39 stalkers left. you just don't get picked off with fungals. he fungaled like no times and got caught out of position rather than having his broods in good position | ||
|
Eurekastreet
1308 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
HaXxorIzed
Australia8434 Posts
| ||
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
On August 17 2012 02:03 Grampz wrote: he fungaled like no times and got caught out of position rather than having his broods in good position was pretty bad by nestea | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland26147 Posts
On August 17 2012 02:02 oogieogie wrote: that is why i like seeing mothership/gateway units instead of carriers..people underestimate how good blink stalkers are vs broodlords. I mean it was 59 stalkers vs 17 broodlords > 0 broodlords with like 39 stalkers left. you just don't get picked off with fungals. Vs Broods with no fungal support, if Zerg players aren't idiots and just camp their infestors in position ready to fungal you can't do those miracle blinks | ||
|
RonNation
United States385 Posts
| ||
|
DDie
Brazil2369 Posts
Lol.... | ||
|
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
| ||
|
lannisport
878 Posts
| ||
|
Havik_
United States5585 Posts
| ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
| ||
|
Heinsenzerg
Argentina2279 Posts
he plays so weird its almost amazing | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
| ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
| ||
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
| ||
|
SilentSC2
United States505 Posts
| ||
|
Orek
1665 Posts
On August 17 2012 01:43 aRyuujin wrote: how? Armor takes damage off each attack. Attack speed is sort of like splash when you're figuring upgrades, because you attack more stuff in the same amount of time Simple example: zergling(attacker) vs marine(0 natural armor) vs +0 armor DPS = {(5-0)/0.7} vs +1 armor DPS = {(5-1)/0.7} Damage reduction effectiveness = 1 - [vs +1 armor DPS]/[vs +0 armor DPS]=1- {(5-1)/0.7}/{(5-0)/0.7}=1-(4/5)=0.2=20% As you can see, attacking speed =0.7 is completely irrelevant as to how effective armor is. It is more about how small each attack value is compared to 1 which is damage reduction value. Units with smaller attacking value like zergling "tend to" have fast attacking speed, but that is not necessarily true mathematically. People often neglect the fact that those units attack fast when there is no armor as well, and make argument like +1 attack benefits hydralisk a lot because hydralisk attack fast, which is completely false logic. | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On August 17 2012 02:04 Wildmoon wrote: who Mvp has to play next? Feast He goes through regardless | ||
| ||
