|
On May 10 2012 19:01 Juliette wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2012 18:59 Juliette wrote:On May 10 2012 18:57 Juliette wrote:Mvp vs PartinG Set 1Set 2Set 3: Red T1 LG-IMMvp <Cloud Kingdom> Pink P7 ST_PartinG Gasless barracks FE for Mvp, Gate -> Nexus -> Gas -> Core for PartinG Mvp is poking with a marine and an scv, attacking a pylon on PartinG's lowground, but leaves when a zealot comes out. 5:00 Mvp adds 2 barracks (3 total) and 2 gas. PartinG adds 2 gates (3 total) and a gas for a total of 2. Mvp also adds on a tech lab. 6:00 Stim begins, a robotics begins.
8:00 Forge, Robotics Bay. Mvp with a starport, EBay, and subsequently, +1 weapons. Reactors on barracks.
+1 armor for PartinG.
|
On May 10 2012 19:01 S_SienZ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2012 19:00 zocktol wrote:On May 10 2012 18:59 JoeSchmoe wrote:On May 10 2012 18:57 Exarl25 wrote:On May 10 2012 18:55 DwD wrote:On May 10 2012 18:54 blade55555 wrote:On May 10 2012 18:53 Gantritor wrote:
Thanks Blizzard for let us watch the best player in the world forced to allin an average player 'cause TvP is imbalanced in late game. Even if it wasn't he probably would, people seem to forget how bad MVP's wrists are atm. Seriously I don't buy this excuse. "His wrists are bad blabla" I doubt it. He had surgery to fix it? If the surgery wasn't successful he would try another one or stop playing and resting. I'm sure he is fine and it's just a bad excuse. He is far from fine. His wrists are completely fucked and he hasn't had any real treatment yet. He is waiting until after GSL so he can rest and let them heal properly. Excuse? Get the fuck out excuse or not. Ts on the korean ladder have been relying on aggressive early-mid game play. Blizzard needs to fix this. Their philosophy of Ts requiring to pressure early-mid game to mitigate P late game advantage is silly. Explain to me why it is silly in TvP and not silly in TvZ? It's not in TvZ? There's your difference.
So if T let's Zerg get to BL/Infesotr, T has no problem to beat them?
|
|
|
Silly MVP, don't expand 
Scv trains are the way forward!
|
Parting 2base allin. QQ more toss please.
|
On May 10 2012 19:01 KiNGxXx wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2012 18:58 masakenji wrote:
home come most of the whiners are European? oh right... naniwa... How come Australians never whine? oh right....no good players... Really, what you want to say. Do you think all Europeans like naniwa and hates MVP now. LOL No!
....what he said was stupid, but that's a bit hostile don't you think?
|
On May 10 2012 19:01 sc2holar wrote:
i dont know what to think about the people who seriously wants another terran champion. Its been a year since toss won a GSL, you dont think its about time that toss get some sort of comeback?
Personally I don't, in this case, care about the races. I've hoped for MVP to come back, and I really hope for HerO to do good. So, no, Protoss does not need some sort of "comeback".
|
when someone is doing 1-1-1 bleah.. noob.. bad player.. so on.
When MVP does it.. good decision, smart player, gogog MVP and so on.
I just cannot understand you guys.. like you ahve no spine..
Go Parting!
|
smart mvp, taking down all the rocks while he has the time...seems many players don't take the time to do that even when it would be advantageous for them ....cough cough zerg.... (not talking about gsl level of course)
|
On May 10 2012 19:02 aznball123 wrote:
Mvp expanding behind it. He must've heard people whining.
He's in partings head. This is how the game genie terran works. Fucks with your head into thinking he will cheese again then BAM!
|
United States33503 Posts
Nooooo Mvp, no macro into lose plz do something cool!
|
MVP:" So let's see what was your game 1 build about" lol
|
On May 10 2012 19:03 DrunkenTemplar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2012 19:01 KiNGxXx wrote:On May 10 2012 18:58 masakenji wrote:
home come most of the whiners are European? oh right... naniwa... How come Australians never whine? oh right....no good players... Really, what you want to say. Do you think all Europeans like naniwa and hates MVP now. LOL No! ....what he said was stupid, but that's a bit hostile don't you think?
It's hostile cause it's true?? =)))
|
Uh Oh Mvp going for a macro game -_-
|
On May 10 2012 19:00 Waxangel wrote:
let's see what happens if PartinG doesn't pick a horrible engagement
Then he wins lol, not a hard question.
Surprised mvp is suiciding this game.
|
3 base cheese incoming from MVP, oh wait . . .
|
MVP letting Parting have 1 macro game like he did vs Nani.
|
On May 10 2012 19:02 blade55555 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2012 19:01 sc2holar wrote:
i dont know what to think about the people who seriously wants another terran champion. Its been a year since toss won a GSL, you dont think its about time that toss get some sort of comeback? nah  . I would rather MVP win 4th one!!
You know there is a game called command and conquer, where there are no alien race. only terran. maybe you should play/watch it instead?
|
On May 10 2012 18:59 iky43210 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2012 18:56 virtu wrote:On May 10 2012 18:50 iky43210 wrote:On May 10 2012 18:48 Lunchador wrote:On May 10 2012 18:46 bittman wrote:
I'm so sick of the fact that our audience appears to dislike a high tension all-in game over long single-a-move battle macro games.
I mean, a close macro game is the best, don't get me wrong. But it seems TL will give a good rating to a long game with 1 battle than a short game with a close battle. Are minerals being mined that exciting? =/ Exactly. I was holding my breath for both players on the push. I thought it was a rather exciting and good match. I was practically shaking watching the interaction between banshee, bunker, etc with parting's stalkers and immortal control. It was quite tense but we can see mvp just has better awareness and control. parting lost a few stalker and zealots to hold command without doing anything Quite the opposite here, I was cringing at the ease with which MVP picked off units, forced parting into siege shots for practically no loss, and the 2 bad (forced) engagements, not killing the rocks at the top etc, just high pressure leading parting into making multiple mistakes that he can't afford to against the likes of MVP, even when he's chain cheesing probably due to his wrists. that's the point. parting was not able to keep up with mvp's aggression cause he was not able to defend the moving tanks/marines while stopping the banshee's harassment. Just didn't have the apm The interaction between protoss shield regen, marines, pheonix, and banshees and back tank depends alot on how much poking terran does while moving up. In contrast with parting controls with his units and manage shield regen and not take too much tank shots
My post was in reference to the fact that people were "holding their breath" during that exchange, I find that a bit ridiculous because the outcome was quite obvious after about 20 seconds of parting miss-controlling and being in a bad position, along with his unit comp. charge-lots are key to holding off a 1/1/1, and parting was lacking zealots in general. Just struggling to understand why people found that game exciting when it wasn't really ever close. Also I totally agree with everything you said (I said the same as you but not as detailed basically).
|
On May 10 2012 19:01 ceaRshaf wrote:
Now MVP will play a macro game, Parting will maybe win it. MVP will next cheese again just like he did with Naniwa and will win and people will say he cheesed because he has no chance in late game, not because he actually meta games.
Ye i find it funny when people here are actually parroting old Idra.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
