|
On April 26 2012 19:54 bittman wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 19:53 opterown wrote:Poll: Rate Winners' Match Game 1★★★★ (18) 42% ★★★ (14) 33% ★★★★★ (7) 16% ★ (4) 9% ★★ (0) 0% 43 total votes Your vote: Rate Winners' Match Game 1 (Vote): ★★★★★ (Vote): ★★★★ (Vote): ★★★ (Vote): ★★ (Vote): ★
Nothing exciting in that game. No super fluffs though, gotta be like 3 stars. Unless I totally missed the exciting part of that game? =o?
Maru's macro
|
Do we have a tally on "outclassed"?
|
On April 26 2012 19:55 Belisarius wrote: Do we have a tally on "outclassed"? Tasteles really likes it...
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On April 26 2012 19:54 bittman wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 19:53 opterown wrote:Poll: Rate Winners' Match Game 1★★★★ (18) 42% ★★★ (14) 33% ★★★★★ (7) 16% ★ (4) 9% ★★ (0) 0% 43 total votes Your vote: Rate Winners' Match Game 1 (Vote): ★★★★★ (Vote): ★★★★ (Vote): ★★★ (Vote): ★★ (Vote): ★
Nothing exciting in that game. No super fluffs though, gotta be like 3 stars. Unless I totally missed the exciting part of that game? =o?
The banter alone is worth 4 stars
|
On April 26 2012 19:50 Wychwood wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 19:47 Belisarius wrote: lol that marine just got owned.
Does anyone else think immortals should have splash, purely on the basis of their animation? Immortals with splash damage? I think I'm gonna have nightmares about that!!! Ha! You can't have an armored unit that cost only about 300 resources and has good single target DPS and then also give it AoE! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
+ Show Spoiler +Unless youa re terran data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
|
Best game so far today I like that style.
|
On April 26 2012 19:56 Hassybaby wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 19:54 bittman wrote:On April 26 2012 19:53 opterown wrote:Poll: Rate Winners' Match Game 1★★★★ (18) 42% ★★★ (14) 33% ★★★★★ (7) 16% ★ (4) 9% ★★ (0) 0% 43 total votes Your vote: Rate Winners' Match Game 1 (Vote): ★★★★★ (Vote): ★★★★ (Vote): ★★★ (Vote): ★★ (Vote): ★
Nothing exciting in that game. No super fluffs though, gotta be like 3 stars. Unless I totally missed the exciting part of that game? =o? The banter alone is worth 4 stars
It wasn't TheBest.
|
I cringed during the last game in the midgame when Tasteless used the supply of the players for his analyses of the situation. Saying that Maru was in a good position based purely off his supply. >_< Really bad.
|
On April 26 2012 19:53 bbQ4Aiur wrote: I guess this old school 2 bases turtle to a 3rd type of protoss suits me more than the parting fast 3rd HT, this is easier to execute..
and much more safer~
|
The T key won Squirtle that game.
|
On April 26 2012 19:56 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 19:50 Wychwood wrote:On April 26 2012 19:47 Belisarius wrote: lol that marine just got owned.
Does anyone else think immortals should have splash, purely on the basis of their animation? Immortals with splash damage? I think I'm gonna have nightmares about that!!! Ha! You can't have an armored unit that cost only about 300 resources and has good single target DPS and then also give it AoE! + Show Spoiler +Unless youa re terran data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
Sieged tank single target damage is comparable to a stimmed rine :>
|
On April 26 2012 19:57 bittman wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 19:56 Hassybaby wrote:On April 26 2012 19:54 bittman wrote:On April 26 2012 19:53 opterown wrote:Poll: Rate Winners' Match Game 1★★★★ (18) 42% ★★★ (14) 33% ★★★★★ (7) 16% ★ (4) 9% ★★ (0) 0% 43 total votes Your vote: Rate Winners' Match Game 1 (Vote): ★★★★★ (Vote): ★★★★ (Vote): ★★★ (Vote): ★★ (Vote): ★
Nothing exciting in that game. No super fluffs though, gotta be like 3 stars. Unless I totally missed the exciting part of that game? =o? The banter alone is worth 4 stars It wasn't TheBest. If you look at it overall it kinda was. Although it might not have been as amusing if you just watch it bit by bit.
|
On April 26 2012 19:55 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2012 19:54 bittman wrote:On April 26 2012 19:53 opterown wrote:Poll: Rate Winners' Match Game 1★★★★ (18) 42% ★★★ (14) 33% ★★★★★ (7) 16% ★ (4) 9% ★★ (0) 0% 43 total votes Your vote: Rate Winners' Match Game 1 (Vote): ★★★★★ (Vote): ★★★★ (Vote): ★★★ (Vote): ★★ (Vote): ★
Nothing exciting in that game. No super fluffs though, gotta be like 3 stars. Unless I totally missed the exciting part of that game? =o? Maru's macro data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" His macro is good but nth really spectacular about that. He got his 3rd faster cause terran has the mid-game advantage, squirtle's 3rd is later cause he went for the 2 bases turtle style ( he probably dont wanna got trashed like what MC did in game 1, unless he has Parting's control ) with the faster 3rd, its reasonable that his supply was ahead.
|
Norway25712 Posts
Fast expansion from Squirtle.
|
Thank god, cancels sentry and makes a robo instead...
|
Norway25712 Posts
Wow, double expand from Maru coming in.
|
GET THAT WEAK STUFF OUTTA HERE
That Hack shirt coming in use with dat Stalker range
|
wow stalker range imba. ahah
|
1/1/1 *****
Now you really gotta win this Squirtle
I mean he's expanding x2, so it's not the same, but it's a matter of principal
|
YOU KNOW WHAT MAKES ME MAD?
Seeing Startale players rape face, which I THOROUGHLY enjoy, but my brohizzle Bomber is still not playing well.
Seriously, step the fuck up Bomber or I'll start whipping you.
|
|
|
|