[GSTL] 2012 Season 1 Grand Finals - Page 447

On April 08 2012 13:14 vndods wrote:

Then why did he continue to play? If he had lost he should have been out and unable to play the remainder of the games.

On April 08 2012 13:05 JJH777 wrote:


it's true. He does it after like every match now. Even ones that are barely important. It's dumb.

On April 08 2012 13:13 Delinius wrote:
Parting wasn't ahead enough to secure a win, and MKP was still reinforcing with a similar worker count with over a dozen racks across his side of the map. People fail to realize protoss units warp in seconds while barracks take 10x longer.

Congrats MarineKing and Prime!

On April 08 2012 13:13 Delinius wrote:
Parting wasn't ahead enough to secure a win, and MKP was still reinforcing with a similar worker count with over a dozen racks across his side of the map. People fail to realize protoss units warp in seconds while barracks take 10x longer.

Congrats MarineKing and Prime!

On April 08 2012 13:14 FrodoAndTheSlobStix wrote:
Every one shut up and get sucked off.

Here are the graphs of partin vs mkp game 1.

A clear parting win, think not? You decide?

http://i.imgur.com/eQRd4.jpg

Gt skd off fgts

On April 08 2012 13:14 duct_TAPE wrote:


When protoss (or any race for that matter) get ontop of terran production facilities and have enough army to kill off the single file units streaming out the game is over. Judging by their army positions when Marineking lost his whole army, he was dead, absolutely dead. It was too close to his production facilities to make a new army in time.

On April 08 2012 13:14 Robson13 wrote:

Parting was on top of half of his production and he had spent his bank, he had lost

On April 08 2012 13:11 MaNaVoId wrote:


You think the referees did not consult the opinions of the teams, on the stream we saw the referees discussing with the teams? He certainly could have turned it down like how bomber did when he was given a free win after a game vs mana when he was certainly going to win, this shows the differences between prime and startale in the integrity of their playeers.

On April 08 2012 13:14 rothsbury wrote:

"We've seen lots of comebacks" does not imply that a comeback is possible in ANY situation, just as "MKP is good at comebacks" does not imply that MKP can come back in ANY situation. Just stupid, stupid logic. People at some level realise that if they analysed the MKP v Parting game then it is a clear parting win, so they ignore that game and point to a bunch of other games that involved comebacks instead.

On April 08 2012 13:12 Femari wrote:
Why aren't we attacking Blizzard for causing this entire situation?

On April 08 2012 13:12 Fubi wrote:

The fact that MKP was in just as bad, if not worst situations in his next 2 games against Bomber and Squirtle, and still somehow pulled out a win, shows that he can make it a possibility.

On April 08 2012 13:06 KubricksMcGuffin wrote:
DEAR BLIZZARD, SUCK MY DICK AND FUCK YOU. ESPECIALLY DUSTIN BROWDER AND THAT LONG-HAIRED WEASEL WHO CALLS HIMSELF A "DESIGN" LEAD DESPITE HIS CLEAR DYSFUNCTION WITH THE CONCEPT OF DESIGN, ESPECIALLY IN CONSIDERATION OF WHAT HE REGARDS AS A PROPER SELF-PRESENTATION. YOU LONG-HAIR STUCK-IN-THE-80'S-METAL-LOVING-FUCK.

Haha, just kidding. MKP owns all the fuckfaces in the world complaining about disconnects. MKP-Prime-Blizzard conspiracy confirmed.

Get fucked.

User was banned for this post.

On April 08 2012 13:14 Denzil wrote:


that defends the parting won argument because if 16 zealots 6 stalkers and 8 templar against a production cycle and then on top of that the warp prism ready to warp in 13 odd zealots in the main production means 2 production cycles to 1 in favour of parting

On April 08 2012 13:13 Havik_ wrote:
MKP bonjwa?? HAHAHAAHA!! I guess that makes MVP, NesTea, MC, MMA, Leenock, and DRG bonjwas too then. You can't dominate for a month or 2 and be bonjwa. The Bonjwas stay at their peak elo/winrates for at least a year. If MKP is in the top 3 of everything he enters for the next year or so, maybe you can call him Bonjwa.

On April 08 2012 13:10 theplagueman wrote:
Some relevant math I did:
149 supply for Parting vs 110 supply MKP
Parting:
79 Probes
Army:
70 supply - 4 observers - warp prism = 65 supply
6 stalkers = 12 supply
53 supply remaining
8 HTs x 2 = 16 supply
53 - 16 = 37 supply remaining
18 zealots ~ = 36 supply
Those are all things that Parting had ON THE FIELD.
MKP had 3 marauders and 6 vikings. 20 of his supply was in production - considering that by the time that production is on the field, parting will have another warp cycle off of 15 gates.... he would be almost 80 supply up in army by the time MKP came out.
As a top masters Protoss, I can say with 100% confidence that unless parting had an aneurism, and even then, MKP would have lost the game. I can respect the judge's decision, but as a player I would be FURIOUS to win a game vs another teams ace player in the finals of the most important team league in the world, and then be forced to re-game.

On April 08 2012 13:14 antilyon wrote:

You seem to be just quoting reddit so I'll post the same thing I post there:

The keypoint here is if MKP had no chance at all, counting warp cycles, Parting's units positions, time until MKP's next cycle come out, how much space MKP had to regroup. You can only know this if you had access to the replay.
If counting all of these factors, MKP had any chance at all for coming back they had to do a regame or else they would be changing their own rules.