EPTOn March 09 2012 17:47 KiNGxXx wrote:
Puma just wants to show Blizzard how bad tanks are vs P.
Puma just wants to show Blizzard how bad tanks are vs P.
Oooh oooh maybe JYP will show Blizzard how bad carriers are next game!
[IEM] World - Day 4 @ CeBIT - Page 11
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
Oooh oooh maybe JYP will show Blizzard how bad carriers are next game! | ||
|
TheNessman
United States4158 Posts
On March 09 2012 17:38 onedayclose wrote: wow forum seems really quiet tonight. Did all the fans quit on this tournament? dude when was the last time you were in a sc2 LR thread? ... they are always very very quiet imo | ||
|
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
On March 09 2012 17:47 sc14s wrote: annnd thats why 111 sucks mid game ^^ 1-1 chargelots with immortal > 111 army MMA did the same build and made it work because he brought back his units after poking the xel naga and transitioning into bio. The handful of tank are actually very good for defending against early aggression and securing a 3rd, plus making the toss scared shitless that they are getting all inned and causing them to cut workers, delay tech, etc. | ||
|
TheNessman
United States4158 Posts
On March 09 2012 17:48 Jyvblamo wrote: Oooh oooh maybe JYP will show Blizzard how bad carriers are next game! Problem: carriers are awesome. | ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
On March 09 2012 17:48 TheNessman wrote: dude when was the last time you were in a sc2 LR thread? ... they are always very very quiet imo have you ever been in an MLG thread? O.o | ||
|
hysterial
United States2044 Posts
I lol'd | ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On March 09 2012 17:47 McGregsen wrote: Fighting two seconds before stim finishes was not the best idea. With stim that would have been a different story. Not sure how much that would've helped tbh. I mean it would've helped, but Jyp still totally crushed it. Needed bunkers a lot more imo. Kind of felt Puma pulled the scvs to early, and the banshees didnt do enough dmg. | ||
|
simmeh
Canada2511 Posts
| ||
|
Gumbotwins
Netherlands256 Posts
He is great aswell! :D EG fighting! | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38149 Posts
Carriers beat Tanks in a one on one fight! | ||
|
Lupita
United States290 Posts
| ||
|
Angelbelow
United States3728 Posts
On March 09 2012 17:48 xrapture wrote: MMA did the same build and made it work because he brought back his units after poking the xel naga and transitioning into bio. The handful of tank are actually very good for defending against early aggression and securing a 3rd, plus making the toss scared shitless that they are getting all inned and causing them to cut workers, delay tech, etc. MMA also did a lot of damage with his banshees. | ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
Hell, even one on two! | ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
On March 09 2012 17:48 xrapture wrote: MMA did the same build and made it work because he brought back his units after poking the xel naga and transitioning into bio. The handful of tank are actually very good for defending against early aggression and securing a 3rd, plus making the toss scared shitless that they are getting all inned and causing them to cut workers, delay tech, etc. sure defending on that map while getting a third but not how puma did it just now. | ||
|
Dakkas
2550 Posts
Hey hey, let's not get overzealous here | ||
|
Mafe
Germany5966 Posts
| ||
|
Angelbelow
United States3728 Posts
| ||
|
McGregsen
Germany110 Posts
| ||
|
Severian
Australia2052 Posts
| ||
|
Dakkas
2550 Posts
| ||
| ||
