EPTwill be exciting to see how good of a fight he puts up :D
[IPL] FC8: Nerchio vs Jjakji - Page 5
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Pulimuli
Sweden2766 Posts
will be exciting to see how good of a fight he puts up :D | ||
|
Sawry
United States32 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Nerchio won. Feel free to hype. Super foreigners are the elephant in the room. Can't take GSL Code S seriously until they have top 200 foreigners in their league. User was banned for this post. | ||
|
Chunhyang
Bangladesh1389 Posts
On January 29 2012 03:01 Sawry wrote: If you click the spoiler, you'll be mad. + Show Spoiler + Nerchio won. Feel free to hype. Super foreigners are the elephant in the room. Can't take GSL Code S seriously until they have top 200 foreigners in their league. So smug. What is your point? | ||
|
mtn
729 Posts
On January 29 2012 03:01 Sawry wrote: If you click the spoiler, you'll be mad. + Show Spoiler + Nerchio won. Feel free to hype. Super foreigners are the elephant in the room. Can't take GSL Code S seriously until they have top 200 foreigners in their league. Too bad that this was played ONLINE. Which means nothing really. | ||
|
mki
Poland882 Posts
On January 29 2012 03:01 Sawry wrote: If you click the spoiler, you'll be mad. + Show Spoiler + Nerchio won. Feel free to hype. Super foreigners are the elephant in the room. Can't take GSL Code S seriously until they have top 200 foreigners in their league. I highly doubt you have a reputable source to this. For instance, englighten me on the score... | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On January 29 2012 03:01 Sawry wrote: If you click the spoiler, you'll be mad. + Show Spoiler + Nerchio won. Feel free to hype. Super foreigners are the elephant in the room. Can't take GSL Code S seriously until they have top 200 foreigners in their league. Source? | ||
|
GenesisX
Canada4267 Posts
successful troll is successful -.- | ||
|
mki
Poland882 Posts
On January 29 2012 03:23 GenesisX wrote: lol @ above... successful troll is successful -.- Yeah except it accomplishes nothing other than trolling. For which he should receive a warning or temp. ban. His post brings nothing into the discussion. OK nvm, just went over his post history - very few quality posts  | ||
|
msjakofsky
1169 Posts
On January 29 2012 03:23 GenesisX wrote: lol @ above... successful troll is successful -.- not to mention that nobody would be mad if he would be right... | ||
|
Packawana
United States1081 Posts
| ||
|
cyclone25
Romania3344 Posts
| ||
|
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
Thanks, Asha also sent me the link via PM. Better edit that out though so the results aren't spoiled. | ||
|
SC2NeCro
Canada507 Posts
This has not been played yet. | ||
|
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On January 29 2012 04:40 SC2NeCro wrote: You guys are terrible trolls. This has not been played yet. If it hasn't been played yet then I guess you would be comfortable with betting money that I will get the results wrong. | ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On January 29 2012 04:23 CosmicSpiral wrote: Thanks, Asha also sent me the link via PM. Better edit that out though so the results aren't spoiled. Because keeping his quoted message unedited does not spoil anything, right? | ||
|
cyclone25
Romania3344 Posts
On January 29 2012 05:10 WigglingSquid wrote: Because keeping his quoted message unedited does not spoil anything, right? He didn't added the results when he quoted me. I also used a double spoiler for the source to make sure people don't accidentally see it. | ||
|
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On January 29 2012 05:10 WigglingSquid wrote: Because keeping his quoted message unedited does not spoil anything, right? Because his quoted message was totally unedited, right? | ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On January 29 2012 05:17 cyclone25 wrote: He didn't added the results when he quoted me. I also used a double spoiler for the source to make sure people don't accidentally see it. Sigh. I'll break it down for you: + Show Spoiler + User A says: P User B says: source plz User C says: here is source S for user A which proves P, result is X as we can see in the source User D says:omg omg hide S, hide X Final result: "here is source [edited out] for A which proves P" Spoiler is still there, unless I got something wrong among edits and subject changes. | ||
|
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On January 29 2012 05:27 WigglingSquid wrote: Sigh. I'll break it down for you: + Show Spoiler + User A says: P User B says: source plz User C says: here is source S for user A which proves P, result is X as we can see in the source User D says:omg omg hide S, hide X Final result: "here is source [edited out] for A which proves P" Spoiler is still there, unless I got something wrong among edits and subject changes. Actually User A was just trolling. | ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
Allow me to break it down again, more clearly: + Show Spoiler + The troll said that player A won. cyclone said "I will post the source for him", then edited out the source and the message; the message still appears in some of your following posts, and that particular phrasing seems to suggest that the troll was right. Of course, I might have gotten something wrong in the edit galore, but I would still advise you to edit cyclone's message in your quotes. | ||
| ||
