| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Yaki
France4234 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:33 GrungyMunchy wrote: To all the people bitching: It was Losira's and Polt's fault that they're not in Code S right now. Should they won the matches as someone of Code S level is expected to, and there wouldn't be any issue. Ever heard of bo1 ? | ||
|
Assirra
Belgium4169 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:33 synaptik wrote: difference is that the koreans are smart enough to make it look like they tried. and another one... | ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:33 GrungyMunchy wrote: To all the people bitching: It was Losira's and Polt's fault that they're not in Code S right now. Should they won the matches as someone of Code S level is expected to, and there wouldn't be any issue. And that makes it fine to just throw matches like that? This isn't about Losira or Polt not getting Code S, it's about throwing a match when there is actually something at stake, while Naniwa missed Code S for throwing a match that ment nothing, | ||
|
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
If i had things my way. Inca would have been allowed to forfeit the game. | ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:31 Incomplet wrote: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Naniwa needs to take a lesson from Inca i think In Naniwa's mindset at the time, doing a probe rush was more beneficial as people don't take the game into account whereas if you failed a 4-gate/6-gate, it will always be brought up and used as proof of 'NesTea will crush Naniwa'. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
They KNEW inca would go DTs before the game began, it's their own fault | ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:28 eXNewB wrote: check this out ![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/5T0Qy) What's the source on this? | ||
|
silverstyle
Singapore1108 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:28 tree.hugger wrote: If InCa had meant to give the game away, I can't imagine why he'd have scouted and pressured with those two early zealots. Better to just get 'surprised' by what Zenio does, or lose the game through passivity, no? Doesn't make sense to build five cannons and then misplace a building, that's not a good way to purposely lose the game. ^This was what I was thinking too, if I was Inca and wanted to throw the game I wouldn't have scouted and went for DTs straight up, perhaps with some minute delays between each building, that way if Zenio busted my front there was nothing that I could do and no one would say anything. IMO no matter what Inca did, if he made ANY MISTAKES AT ALL during the match, losira and polt fans would still cry foul. I'm sure Inca would know of the shitstorm that would ensue if he lost by making bad mistakes, but well... its Inca? | ||
|
Giriath
Sweden2412 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:34 gullberg wrote: Just keep them in the booths so they don't know how many games their opponent won/lost? They have internet connection on the computers of course, and can check the standings. | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
And for those of you saying "this match was thrown." Let me just say this. Innocent until proven guilty. I saw no blatant throwing of the game going on. Pros make mistakes. We've all seen pros make tons of stupid mistakes before, let's not throw accusations around please. These ppl know FULLY WELL the consequences of throwing a game. Match fixing is like plotting world domination to Koreans. They know better than to do it | ||
|
MiraMax
Germany532 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:27 Logros wrote: And that means the match wasn't thrown? Use your brain this is what Tyler mentioned before as well, it's exactly the same thing except less obvious. Zenio does a quick all-in, Inca scouts it way before it hits and 'accidentaly' leaves a gap in his wall. He even had 1 pylon powering like 3 buildings and 3-4 cannons but Zenio didn't go for it. He served the game up on a silver platter for Zenio. It's exactly NOT the same thing precisely because it is "less obvious". Failed wall-ins do happen - 7probe rushes do not. Sure, it might be that Inca threw the game intentionally, but you have to give players the benefit of the doubt, especially if they are well-known for blundering like this, but not for throwing games. It also serves to show how damaging Naniwas move was, because now everybody will start crying "cheater" and asking for "just punishment" at every instance. | ||
|
SuperFanBoy
New Zealand1068 Posts
100% thrown. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
tbh it doesnt really matter, standard group play, it may or may not have happened 20 times already but now everyone is wary because of Naniwa's ban get used to it, untill they change the format | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Ever heard of preparation? It's Inca. He goes DTs What did they not prepare for? What did they lose to? Its 100% their fault... | ||
|
_DarkArchon_
Canada24 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:29 elwoodng wrote: The difference is Inca is smart enough to make it look like a mistake. Agreed. Thats the beauty of it, it's virtually impossible to "know" it was a throw. After the Naniwa/Coca shitstorm ppl are going to be more careful when they decide to throw a match. | ||
|
zerino
Denmark253 Posts
 ? | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
|
howLiN
Portugal1676 Posts
Bomber didn't have any problems with bo1s. I'm guessing it's because he's actually Code S level. | ||
|
TheRidd
713 Posts
| ||
|
0ne
Spain2464 Posts
On December 21 2011 21:36 zerino wrote: that picture, with people talking about letting him win was removed fast ?because it was fake ? | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
WardiTV Invitational
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
|
|
|
EPT
