|
Can't go to lunch without coming back to 20+ reports. This makes me upset. Stop the bullshit or get ready to hammered. Thanks --Pholon |
On December 13 2011 20:39 shabby wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Since people are still arguing even though we're way past the game, lets settle it and move on: Poll: Who deserved to win between Naniwa and Polt?Polt, he didn't play it perfectly, but Naniwa clearly played worse. (55) 67% Naniwa, he made a few mistakes, but not as many as polt. (15) 18% Polt, he played it perfectly. (11) 13% Naniwa, he played flawlessly! (1) 1% 82 total votes Your vote: Who deserved to win between Naniwa and Polt? (Vote): Naniwa, he played flawlessly!
(Vote): Naniwa, he made a few mistakes, but not as many as polt.
(Vote): Polt, he played it perfectly.
(Vote): Polt, he didn't play it perfectly, but Naniwa clearly played worse.
Coming from a toss player, there's nothing to argue; naniwa had his last warp in of zealots standing around like vegetables because he didn't rally them into combat. It's frustrating when you make that mistake and realize once it's too late that you had a bunch of guys doing nothing, but you just have to accept it and move on. And yes, each additional batch of zealots makes a HUGE difference.
|
On December 13 2011 20:41 artrea wrote:Free game vs MMA ? MMA PvT is not that bad 
It's by far the worst MU for him, and Calm before the storm is great for P and especially for Nani's style. It's not free, but Nani should kick himself if he loses this crucial game.
|
|
|
United States23455 Posts
Proxy Thors.
Hahahahahahahahaha.
|
|
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
|
United Kingdom38257 Posts
Props to Khaldor for calling the proxy thor rush.
I think it was...Noblesse vs Choya yesterday in the KSL?
|
Norway25712 Posts
No way, proxy Thor. This could absolutely destroy Toss!
|
|
|
....proxy thor rush.
Naniwa is being cheesed three times in a row.
|
Khaldor good call buddy =)
|
Hahaha thor rush against FE Nani :D
|
|
|
|
|
wtf thors.
never seen this before..
|
|
|
Observations from Polt/Naniwa game:
Naniwa went economy and aggression, a classic mistake.
You can say he was trying to delay the 1/1/1 from polt, but he was clearly attacking. Look at the number of zealots/sentries he lost at polt's doorstep.
Polt didn't open 1/1/1 as far as I know. It was a read on Naniwa and a good one.
Naniwa engaged too early. He should have guessed that with 3 siege mode tanks, a raven, and the number of marines/scv's lost fighting in polt's base that it was an all-in. Even if he lost his own nexus then attacked, he would have been at an advantage if he came out on top.
In short: Naniwa was too aggressive trying to finish the game while expanding, and was ineffective dealing with the 1/1/1 push when it came.
anyway take a look at the fucking game happening right now LOL
|
On December 13 2011 20:40 MrCash wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 20:39 shabby wrote:Since people are still arguing even though we're way past the game, lets settle it and move on: Poll: Who deserved to win between Naniwa and Polt?Polt, he didn't play it perfectly, but Naniwa clearly played worse. (55) 67% Naniwa, he made a few mistakes, but not as many as polt. (15) 18% Polt, he played it perfectly. (11) 13% Naniwa, he played flawlessly! (1) 1% 82 total votes Your vote: Who deserved to win between Naniwa and Polt? (Vote): Naniwa, he played flawlessly!
(Vote): Naniwa, he made a few mistakes, but not as many as polt.
(Vote): Polt, he played it perfectly.
(Vote): Polt, he didn't play it perfectly, but Naniwa clearly played worse.
Whoever won, by default, overall played better. Any argument against facts is not one that holds any weight.
Assuming perfect balance yes, assuming 1-1-1 is 2 stronk no.
|
LOL naniwa going to get killed by a thor rush
|
sick prediction from Khaldor
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
