EPTOn November 26 2011 23:30 AxionSteel wrote:
how can you not have a robo at that stage
how can you not have a robo at that stage
Playing risky is what got Seiplo here. I'm glad it backfired at some point
DreamHack Winter 2011 Day 3 - Page 121
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Thurken
961 Posts
Playing risky is what got Seiplo here. I'm glad it backfired at some point | ||
|
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
Seriously what happened to TB and Apollo? (not complaining, am just curious) | ||
|
DoubleDouble
United States106 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:33 Weson wrote: Seiplo deserved to win that. Well he will win the next 2 if he plays as good as he did in the 1st one. how did he deserve to win? hero defended against his dt's, played from behind, and took advantage of seiplo having no robo with good scouting. | ||
|
rakoth
Greece55 Posts
| ||
|
deathzz
669 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:31 akalarry wrote: we don't even know how many times puma has tried to qualify for the gsl. for all we know as of now, he's only tried to qualify for the most recent one. losing one best of 3 to a top 30 gm zerg is nothing to be ashamed about. which is why i say wait for him get into gsl and let him prove himself whether is he dat good or just average before deciding | ||
|
SafeAsCheese
United States4924 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:32 ItsMeDomLee wrote: At what point did he outplay Hero? He got ahead via DTs and lost to DTs. Hero didn't die to DTs, Seiplo did. Who got outplayed? He had more workers and more units in a matchup where it's very hard to pull ahead of your opponent, and the DT put him into a winning position. That's called outplaying. Not placing a robo when being so far ahead was his single mistake. One mistake doesn't mean you didn't outplay someone., win or lose. | ||
|
NHY
1013 Posts
Seiplo goes DT against robo tech and gets lucky -> wow Seiplo is so smart! HerO sees that Seiplo has no detection and goes robo and kills Seiplo -> wow Seiplo is so unlucky! | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:31 Zath.erin wrote: I don't know how they can say HerO was lucky when he scouted the lack of detection then went DT's. because it takes a long time to build a shrine and if they get forge for ups or a robo dt shrine puts you further behind so somewhat luck based, its also 5 less stalkers in gas to go dt later which is risky when the other guy has blink | ||
|
rushian
United Kingdom568 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:34 DoubleDouble wrote: how did he deserve to win? hero defended against his dt's, played from behind, and took advantage of seiplo having no robo with good scouting. He's obviously biased. | ||
|
Montana[TK]
1624 Posts
| ||
|
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:34 NHY wrote: I know we all like to see underdog do well but this bias is really something else. Seiplo goes DT against robo tech and gets lucky -> wow Seiplo is so smart! HerO sees that Seiplo has no detection and goes robo and kills Seiplo -> wow Seiplo is so unlucky! because the timing matters | ||
|
wklbishop
United States1286 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:32 ItsMeDomLee wrote: At what point did he outplay Hero? He got ahead via DTs and lost to DTs. Hero didn't die to DTs, Seiplo did. Who got outplayed? QFT. Plus, Hero made a calculated risk by having an observer over Seiplo whereas Seiplo took more of a blind risk and hoped Hero didn't already have an observer. | ||
|
HallBregg
134 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:33 Weson wrote: Seiplo deserved to win that. Well he will win the next 2 if he plays as good as he did in the 1st one. No. People don't DESERVE to win. They either do, or don't. Seiplo played a great game and I agree that he outclassed HerO in a lot of aspects but HerO did read him and the situation like a book and took his only chance to come back, it worked. So tell me why exactly Seiplo did deserve the win then? Its stupid to say I'm sorry. There's no such thing as deserving things in eSports and 1v1. | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5217 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:31 Lakai wrote: What are they talking about hero being lucky... it's well known that going DT after your opponent rushes it is actually a nice meta-game maneuver. Hero was lucky because Seiplo should have had some kind of detection, it is either a pretty amateurish mistake or a choice that is very risky. Either way, a top player like Seiplo should have had detection, and he didn't, and that gives Hero a lucky win after initially being outplayed because Seiplo choose to play incredibly risky. | ||
|
poorcloud
Singapore2748 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:34 SafeAsCheese wrote: He had more workers and more units in a matchup where it's very hard to pull ahead of your opponent, and the DT put him into a winning position. That's called outplaying. Not being a robo when being so far ahead was his single mistake. One mistake doesn't mean you didn't outplay someone., win or lose. But he had more workers cause of the kills of his DTs now? And hero caught up in workers anyways. So how is hero winning with his DTs lucky but seiplo getting ahead with his DTs outplaying? | ||
|
methoD.
48 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:34 NHY wrote: I know we all like to see underdog do well but this bias is really something else. Seiplo goes DT against robo tech and gets lucky -> wow Seiplo is so smart! HerO sees that Seiplo has no detection and goes robo and kills Seiplo -> wow Seiplo is so unlucky! indeed, such brilliant Decision making from HerO | ||
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
| ||
|
Lavi
Bangladesh793 Posts
| ||
| ||
