EG.HuK will be replacing oGs.SK.MC in ASUS ROG Stars Invite tournament as MC is unable to attend because of overlapping WCG qualifier tournament.
We are sorry to inform that one of the most anticipated players in our roster, oGs.SK.MC, will not be participating in the ASUS ROG Stars Invite tournament. We have been told that he will be attending the Korean World Cyber Games qualifiers held on the same date instead. No official statement about the issue has been given, but we understand that he can not pass a chance to be on the Korean national esports team. This is sad news as we were really excited about our Korean representative when oGs.SK accepted our invite.
UPDATE: oGs.SK has released a statement regarding the issue:
We are sorry to announce that oGsSK.MC won't make it to ASUS ROG Stars Invite tournament. MC will focus on his WCG Korea qualifier and so he has to step back from this tournament. I hope next time there won't be any other tournaments so MC can make it to Finland. Thanks to the tournament host for their understanding.
Fortunately, MC’s slot has been already filled with a worthy replacement: the fresh MLG champion and Code-S player, Chris “HuK” Loranger. Joining the tournament with his team mate IdrA, HuK now doubles the chances for Evil Geniuses to take the trophy. As unfortunate it is to lose a player of MC’s caliber less than two weeks before the event, the more lucky we are to get such a great player to take his place. We wish MC all the luck in his future battles as we welcome HuK to ASUS ROG Stars Invite.
Kinda awesome actually. A lot of people in Korea think MC still hasn't stepped up his game to Code S level (notably Naniwa in Fuck Slasher) whereas Huk has really proved himself recently. <3 Huk! EG finals gogo.
A little dissapointed there won't be another fated IdrA vs MC matchup, but I think I'll live if it means another awesome EG gets in.
On October 27 2011 08:03 headbus wrote: Good news, more foreign presence in any tournament is good, especially when its the best foreigners we have to offer.
On October 27 2011 08:03 headbus wrote: Good news, more foreign presence in any tournament is good, especially when its the best foreigners we have to offer.
Sad we wont get to see if mc's level truly is ready for code S, and wont get the traditional foreigner v Korea battle, but the invites all look awesome! Gl all!
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
I think you should learn english and you have no idea what you're talking about.
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
I understood absolutely nothing you just said.... HuK ftw!
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
... So you're saying that Huk will lose to unconventional play, then literally one line later you say he will lose to Idra, the most standard, straightup zerg ever...
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
I think you should learn english and you have no idea what you're talking about.
EXCUSE ME! How much of a low blow is that? He is from Czech Republic you idiot. What are you? 10 years old? GTFO you low life.
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
I think you should learn english and you have no idea what you're talking about.
EXCUSE ME! How much of a low blow is that? He is from Czech Republic you idiot. What are you? 10 years old? GTFO you low life.
It's an English website and his post was almost unreadable.
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
I think you should learn english and you have no idea what you're talking about.
EXCUSE ME! How much of a low blow is that? He is from Czech Republic you idiot. What are you? 10 years old? GTFO you low life.
It's an English website and his post was almost unreadable.
We're a multi-national community, communicating in English. Not everyone has perfect english, and you shouldn't insult them because of it. I'd rather have people post with bad grammar, than be scared to post at all.
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
I understood absolutely nothing you just said.... HuK ftw!
Not sure how you possibly couldnt understand. I will explain: If player have classic player map control, if luck within jokes, you don't know what you're talking about because stalker blink zealot charge, just watch it and boom boom marauder die die, Sir!
Edit: How exactly were ASUS planning to make a top foreigner tournament without inviting the most sucessful foreigner player?
On October 27 2011 09:32 DaRKMaTT3r wrote: How exactly were ASUS planning to make a top foreigner tournament without inviting the most sucessful foreigner player?
you mean stephano don't you ;> he can't be everywhere
On October 27 2011 09:32 DaRKMaTT3r wrote: How exactly were ASUS planning to make a top foreigner tournament without inviting the most sucessful foreigner player?
you mean stephano don't you ;> he can't be everywhere
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
First Nada passes up ESWC to play in WCG, now this. I wish Koreans wouldn't put so much stock into WCG. As far as SC2 goes it's just another tournament no more prestigious than the rest.
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
LOL. huk is the best foreigner, and is now the favorite to win this tournament. How can you say a dreamhack summer champion, homestory cup 3 champion, and an mlg orlando 2011 champion only wins because of luck?
well interest in this tournament has officially dramatically decreased, too bad for them losing MC he always brings alot not just great games, its kind of fitting to get him replaced by huk considering MC was the favorite to win lets see if the student can live up to his master
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
Biased Huk fan? He is completely correct.
Huk is more successful. That is inarguable. You can say you think Stephano is better, but so far Huk has FAR more accomplishments.
On October 27 2011 08:21 exltus wrote: OMG... i was looking for MC...not this lucker...
what lol? lucker, the man who just won MLG, beating MC? Stop trolling
Y he played wery well but he is lucky in lot of games... he plays blindy...does not scout too mutch...he simple play that what he wanted at start and dont meather what is going for his oponent... but hes wining = he is lucky... may is it because he have op micro and game sence...but itill is it blindy...
You just described MC playstyle -_-
rofl...youre just fun as HUK than youre writinh this jokes, but you really dont know what about you are talking...watch some games and next you can say somethink...if willl huk against some player that havent got "clasic" playstile, but own tactic, uk will be in big problem...just w8 for turnament...you will see...I thik that HUK will end on Idra, because of mapcontrol...
I think you should learn english and you have no idea what you're talking about.
EXCUSE ME! How much of a low blow is that? He is from Czech Republic you idiot. What are you? 10 years old? GTFO you low life.
And? I wouldnt go on some chinese forum and try to communicate using terrible chinese that nobody can understand
On October 27 2011 08:16 ImmortalTofu wrote: Sad we wont get to see if mc's level truly is ready for code S, and wont get the traditional foreigner v Korea battle, but the invites all look awesome! Gl all!
If he can beat Mvp in the WCG Ro16, that's probably a good way to prove himself
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
huk has still won more tournaments, and although the prize money was not as much in these tournaments, the competition was higher (eg. mlg orlando). if thats not enough for you, get ready for this one...
He is in code s...
And he plays protoss
*and the crowd goes wild*
but if you were arguing prize money well than huk gets paid more by EG than what stephano gets in tournament winnings each year.
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
Biased Huk fan? He is completely correct.
Huk is more successful. That is inarguable. You can say you think Stephano is better, but so far Huk has FAR more accomplishments.
Stephano's money won tells otherwise
it's a matter of view, prize money is a valid point of view, according to that, Stephano is more accomplished.
he said an absolute statement "huk is the most succesful foreigner" which is simply not true, not if you look at overall results, and not if you look at recent results either. i had a little trollish intent with the stephano argument but my point stands
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
im using your logic. higher salary means sponsors want that player more. and they want that player more because he is better.
now please try to explain why you think higher tournament prize pool actually makes a player better, or more accomplished.
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
im using your logic. higher salary means sponsors want that player more. and they want that player more because he is better.
now please try to explain why you think higher tournament prize pool actually makes a player better, or more accomplished.
ok i'll try to explain.
if your mommy gives you 10 cents and you steal 5 cents from your kindergarten mates, you are a worse bully than your friend who gets 5 cents from his mommy but steals 10 cents. cuz the payoff of your performance is less. comprende?
to you EG paying a lot of money equals as succesful in starcraft? Machine probably gets more money from EG than Ret from TL and who's the more succesful player? Machine?
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
Winning$ is a terrible way to determine success because it scales horribly. Are you suggesting that Stephano's IPL win is equal to 6 MLG wins? I hope not. IPL3 and ESCW were huge wins for Stephano, but just because their prize money is bigger doesn't make them more prestigious than Dreamhack, IEM, MLG, etc.
On October 27 2011 11:59 Bullet wrote: It's weird to say this, but this tournament got more difficult to win with a foreigner replacing a "top tier" korean. @_@ i like. ^^
I guess a lot of top players would tell you they prefer to playing huk, comparing to Mc. List is long man. Players such as stephano, Idra, select, thorzain, sheth, Bomber, MVP (who says the game against Mc was the hardest game he had in the season even though he won and knocked Mc out Code S and said the games against Huk were easy to him), Sjow.
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
Winning$ is a terrible way to determine success because it scales horribly. Are you suggesting that Stephano's IPL win is equal to 6 MLG wins? I hope not. IPL3 and ESCW were huge wins for Stephano, but just because their prize money is bigger doesn't make them more prestigious than Dreamhack, IEM, MLG, etc.
i emphasized that it is one way to decide, not the only
That's one handsome motherfucker, I'm telling ya. HuK is my favorite player, so it's kind of a good deal, sorry MC (Would have traded IdrA to have MC back though, I'm protoss so eh...)
On October 27 2011 11:59 Bullet wrote: It's weird to say this, but this tournament got more difficult to win with a foreigner replacing a "top tier" korean. @_@ i like. ^^
I guess a lot of top players would tell you they prefer to playing huk, comparing to Mc. List is long man. Players such as stephano, Idra, select, thorzain, sheth, Bomber, MVP (who says the game against Mc was the hardest game he had in the season even though he won and knocked Mc out Code S and said the games against Huk were easy to him), Sjow.
I'm assuming the majority of the list is made up or perhaps dated (if it's not than my apologies). However, we can also look back to MLG where July says Huk was scary and MC was not.
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
Winning$ is a terrible way to determine success because it scales horribly. Are you suggesting that Stephano's IPL win is equal to 6 MLG wins? I hope not. IPL3 and ESCW were huge wins for Stephano, but just because their prize money is bigger doesn't make them more prestigious than Dreamhack, IEM, MLG, etc.
dont bother trying to argue with him. he just doesnt get it.
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
Winning$ is a terrible way to determine success because it scales horribly. Are you suggesting that Stephano's IPL win is equal to 6 MLG wins? I hope not. IPL3 and ESCW were huge wins for Stephano, but just because their prize money is bigger doesn't make them more prestigious than Dreamhack, IEM, MLG, etc.
dont bother trying to argue with him. he just doesnt get it.
to me it seems you don't get what i'm saying, so really what's the point of stating this? you think if you agree with someone else you'll be right?
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
Winning$ is a terrible way to determine success because it scales horribly. Are you suggesting that Stephano's IPL win is equal to 6 MLG wins? I hope not. IPL3 and ESCW were huge wins for Stephano, but just because their prize money is bigger doesn't make them more prestigious than Dreamhack, IEM, MLG, etc.
dont bother trying to argue with him. he just doesnt get it.
to me it seems you don't get what i'm saying, so really what's the point of stating this? you think if you agree with someone else you'll be right?
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
Biased Huk fan? He is completely correct.
Huk is more successful. That is inarguable. You can say you think Stephano is better, but so far Huk has FAR more accomplishments.
Stephano's money won tells otherwise
it's a matter of view, prize money is a valid point of view, according to that, Stephano is more accomplished.
he said an absolute statement "huk is the most succesful foreigner" which is simply not true, not if you look at overall results, and not if you look at recent results either. i had a little trollish intent with the stephano argument but my point stands
Andddd here we have it folks, yet ANOTHER annoying Euroforumstar that defends Stephano to DEATH! Please hold the applause until all forumstars have made their appearance!
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
Stephano has gotten 2 wins in 2 weeks, huk got 2 in 1 week against good players. Whenever Stephano played a code S player, except for huk he lost.
We apologize for removing one top-tier Protoss player and replacing him with the Protoss who beat him in the finals of the last MLG. We hope this doesn't affect the quality of the games.
Glad it happened, Huk was saying he wanted to attend a few more tournaments in State of the Game, so I guess this is his chance to pwn some more noobs. Good luck Huk!
I'm really glad we'll get to see HuK again so soon! Code S is such a volatile place that he could be eliminated just because of a bad group selection, so this way we get to see him play more.
Alongside IdrA, I really think EG is going to have a good showing at this tournament!
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
huk is the most successful foreigner because he has been a code s mainstay and has a few foreign wins as well. his dreamhack was as good or better than the tourney stephano just won and his mlg was flat out stronger than ipl3(which was very strong in its own right). thats not saying huk is the better player right now, but in terms of success huk is definitely in the lead.
On October 27 2011 07:59 Jehct wrote: Kinda awesome actually. A lot of people in Korea think MC still hasn't stepped up his game to Code S level (notably Naniwa in Fuck Slasher) whereas Huk has really proved himself recently. <3 Huk! EG finals gogo.
Can I have a link to where nani said that about MC?
Better this way.. "MC" era is done...he can't even keep up in code S, i don't think he will be there a long time.
ATM even with all the Koreans out there, Huk is one of the best P in GSL.....and holds out in code S pritty well....atleast 10 times better then "Penix is OP... k3 k3 k3" troll
Will defently watch this competition as it has some of my favorite players that i'v "stalked" since SC2 appeared :D
@Nazgul how dare u mistake the flags! Stop stealing our foreigners u silly silly bear >.> /hugs
Even better then MC great replacement. Tobad Stephano isnt there woudl be cool to have a small tournament with the best foreigners going at it. But nonetheless gonna be awesome. I think Huk or Dimaga gonna take it. Huk wont lose the PvP and Dimaga wont lose the ZvZ
Is Huk becoming the world Protoss representative? All the Koreans already respect him from his GSL performance, he won many major tournaments. What other Protoss has his qualifications?
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
im using your logic. higher salary means sponsors want that player more. and they want that player more because he is better.
now please try to explain why you think higher tournament prize pool actually makes a player better, or more accomplished.
ok i'll try to explain.
if your mommy gives you 10 cents and you steal 5 cents from your kindergarten mates, you are a worse bully than your friend who gets 5 cents from his mommy but steals 10 cents. cuz the payoff of your performance is less. comprende?
to you EG paying a lot of money equals as succesful in starcraft? Machine probably gets more money from EG than Ret from TL and who's the more succesful player? Machine?
If you read the previous pages of the thread you're pretty much the only one defending this theory that Stephano has more major tournament wins than HuK. You want to believe that nice, but the way you're arguing and repeating yourself that leads me to believe you're just trying to troll.
Huk won DreamHack, HSC and MLG (wich was the most stacked one) all 3 of them stacked with top koreans , while Stephano won IPL (impressive win but according to most pros less stacked than MLG) plus ESWC (not a huge korean presence, only 2 and he only had to face one to get to the title). If yiou want to count the number of titles Stephano won lately (counting small online tournaments), yes Stephano won more while HuK is stuck on an easy tournament called GSL Code S.
Another similar example is MC vs MVP vs Nestea: Between those 3 MVP is the most sucessful in GSL runs, he also retains rank 1 on GSL rankings, however on money won in GSL it goes 1st Nestea 2nd MC 3rd MVP 4th Polt (because he won Super Tournament wich had the biggest prize pool)
And to add to the extras, HuK is interested in always improving to be the best sc2 player he can be while Stephano spend more of his "practice time" going to da bank!
I think HuK is more than able to replace MC! However, it is unfortunate to lose the "only" korean and the chance for MC vs Idra. I still think the overall quality and merit of the tournament is still amazing.
I think it's a bit sad is that in all big 8 player tournaments nearly the same foreigners are invited. I Would love to see it a bit more mixed up even if we would have to renounce sometimes the very best players.
On October 27 2011 08:03 headbus wrote: Good news, more foreign presence in any tournament is good, especially when its the best foreigners we have to offer.
Not really so much when the push out the only Korean in it....... assuming you don't count select
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
im using your logic. higher salary means sponsors want that player more. and they want that player more because he is better.
now please try to explain why you think higher tournament prize pool actually makes a player better, or more accomplished.
ok i'll try to explain.
if your mommy gives you 10 cents and you steal 5 cents from your kindergarten mates, you are a worse bully than your friend who gets 5 cents from his mommy but steals 10 cents. cuz the payoff of your performance is less. comprende?
to you EG paying a lot of money equals as succesful in starcraft? Machine probably gets more money from EG than Ret from TL and who's the more succesful player? Machine?
If you read the previous pages of the thread you're pretty much the only one defending this theory that Stephano has more major tournament wins than HuK. You want to believe that nice, but the way you're arguing and repeating yourself that leads me to believe you're just trying to troll.
Huk won DreamHack, HSC and MLG (wich was the most stacked one) all 3 of them stacked with top koreans , while Stephano won IPL (impressive win but according to most pros less stacked than MLG) plus ESWC (not a huge korean presence, only 2 and he only had to face one to get to the title). If yiou want to count the number of titles Stephano won lately (counting small online tournaments), yes Stephano won more while HuK is stuck on an easy tournament called GSL Code S.
Another similar example is MC vs MVP vs Nestea: Between those 3 MVP is the most sucessful in GSL runs, he also retains rank 1 on GSL rankings, however on money won in GSL it goes 1st Nestea 2nd MC 3rd MVP 4th Polt (because he won Super Tournament wich had the biggest prize pool)
And to add to the extras, HuK is interested in always improving to be the best sc2 player he can be while Stephano spend more of his "practice time" going to da bank!
IPL3 was way more stacked than MLG. IT's not even close.
Huk, the winner of MLG, said himself that he and MC wouldn't have been able to do so well if the slayers terran were in the tournaments... they were all at IPL3.
You can't possibly compare a tournament with players like Incontrol, Drewbie, TLO with IPL3. True the open bracket of MLG was way more difficult than the open bracket of IPL3, but the pools of MLG were way behind the pools of IPL3. And since the players in the open bracket don't have a real chance in MLG, why would you count them ?
We heavily regret to inform you that one of the most anticipated players in our pool has been replaced by SOMEONE WHO WILL SURELY BE MORE ANTICIPATED!!! WOOOOO! FIGHTIIIIIIING
On October 27 2011 08:03 headbus wrote: Good news, more foreign presence in any tournament is good, especially when its the best foreigners we have to offer.
Not really so much when the push out the only Korean in it....... assuming you don't count select
Considering 5 of the 8 players have KR training/experience and since I don't consider SeleCT to be "Korean"... this might be the BEST non-Korean tournament to date?
On October 28 2011 00:27 Elean wrote:And since the players in the open bracket don't have a real chance in MLG, why would you count them ?
This kind of undermines your post. TheStC came 3rd and came from the open bracket.
Well, I thought theStc was the best proof of my point. TheStC's run was way way way more impressive than Huk's, and yet he didn't win.
Naniwa won an MLG from the open bracket. Anyone who makes it into pool play from the open bracket will have not played a ton of games on day two prior to their pool games. At most like two extra series. Day three, which is the day that theSTC lost to Huk on, they were both evenly rested.
I like every event which has HuK in it but isn't this event just 2 days after his Code S games next week? I fear he might overtravel again... Sometimes it's better to skip a tournament because the next MLG and Dreamhack are also coming soon.
On October 27 2011 11:42 msjakofsky wrote: Sniper we don't know huk's or stephano's salaries and assumptions are not good arguments, that salary has not much to do with the debate either
then neither does the tournament winnings.
unless you can somehow prove that tournament prize pool directly relates to higher tournament competition.
what are you talking about? salary is not in direct immediate connection with performance. sponsors don't change salaries immediately after small periods. HuK would still earn well if he didn't win anything for 3 months, and Millenium recently outbid Col on Stephano so probably he earns well too...
the arguing was about who's more "succesful", and winnings is a way to determine that
not the only way, but certainly a way- that's why one shouldn't make statements like "huk's the most succesful". because there are more ways to decide.
Winning$ is a terrible way to determine success because it scales horribly. Are you suggesting that Stephano's IPL win is equal to 6 MLG wins? I hope not. IPL3 and ESCW were huge wins for Stephano, but just because their prize money is bigger doesn't make them more prestigious than Dreamhack, IEM, MLG, etc.
dont bother trying to argue with him. he just doesnt get it.
to me it seems you don't get what i'm saying, so really what's the point of stating this? you think if you agree with someone else you'll be right?
Pretty sure HuK has more LAN wins than Stephano, plus HuK is in Code S and Stephano is not.
HuK is the most successful foreigner.
pretty sure Stephano won more money than Huk without even trying to enter the gsl in just 2 weeks, is 4-0 vs huk and has about as many tourney wins even if not all lan. but clearly huk is the most succesful foreigner.
or you're just biased huk fan. hmm i wonder which one is more true of the 2 statements
Stephano has gotten 2 wins in 2 weeks, huk got 2 in 1 week against good players. Whenever Stephano played a code S player, except for huk he lost.
i guess MKP is not code S then right? why the hell do you argue if you don't know the data?
and to that Hal0ween brainiac, i wasn't defending Stephano at all, but i guess it was too much for you to comprehend. cuz you think it's blasphemy to think huk is not better than everyone, which is idiotic obviously.