EPT[IPL] Day 3 Live Report Thread - Page 270
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Standard LR thread rules apply. No caster bashing, no insulting the interviewers, no player bashing, no balance whining. Bans will be doled out to violators so don't shit up this thread with immature garbage. | ||
|
Roynalf
Finland886 Posts
| ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:01 Hemula wrote: Was not MC an abuser of toss, when he was reaping everybody apart? If you can abuse it means you pretty damn good to do so. Mechanically and brain-wise. If you can abuse, it means you'll be good in the first year or so of the game and you'll be gone when the game actually becomes good. Whatever. | ||
|
Sleight
2471 Posts
On October 09 2011 03:57 Liquid`Jinro wrote: agdfdhasjgsjhfgjkgkdfghfggfdj Jinro explains that game perfectly. It wasn't just a 1-1-1. Is was a proxy-stargate countered by 1-1-1 transition countered by fast Twight Council. How could people not notice Puma TARGETTING DOWN THE OBSERVER so his Banshees could cloak with impunity? How could people not notice Hero preparing to proxy the DT before Puma even moved out? It was a boxing match. Puma slugged a little harder. Great game and I am maining Protoss currently (normally random). | ||
|
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:00 Budzlight wrote: How is that a reference to this game? Hero held and kinda won but with that cocky expo im sure thats what cost the game. Both players did great. So sad that Hero lost i had nerd chills coming on. No it didn't, Hero didn't have the production to spend the minerals. May be it could have been spent in pylon + 2 gateways instead of nexus, but wouldn't have made a difference, the game ended right away. 1-1-1 is just sad. And to those bashing on hero's cheese. He was certain PuMa was 1-1-1'ing on the decider on XNF, he does it all the time. Unscouted proxy stargate is a decent build against 1-1-1. | ||
|
Darth Caedus
United States326 Posts
| ||
|
LetoAtreides82
United States1188 Posts
And he lost the void ray and the proxy stargate. His biggest mistake is the dt and the unnecessary expo. | ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:00 MuseMike wrote: He had no warp-in cycles and canceled the nexus. The warpgates were never idle. At the same time, Then he should've had the gates down faster, it isn't like he got all those minerals just as he put the nexus down. Sad that hero lost though, such brilliant play from him | ||
|
ETisME
12898 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:00 ChuCky.Ca wrote: Which would be useless wouldnt have gotten close to getting up still would have been better than a nexus? I don't think you saw how hero had a fail contain break and losing almost all his units | ||
|
GuiltyJerk
United States584 Posts
 | ||
|
Sinsai
24 Posts
| ||
|
sopas
509 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:00 Tuk wrote: what i dont understand is that both players cheesed , puma had better decision making (or heroes was just bad (the nexus)) but somehow people on hero. :| the nexus didnt mean shit he didnt have any way to spend his minerals cos his gates were unpowered/destroyed he even had like 500 mins at the end of the game mate | ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
| ||
|
hYdrA-MeNo
Mexico344 Posts
On October 09 2011 03:59 Noocta wrote: So i guess we can hate on PumA specificly now ? Because he's one of the few terran to still use this kind of play after the patch. and whats wrong with that?........ | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:01 WickedBit wrote: Considering he loses every time he doeskin 111 i think its a fair statement  . I hope he faces a zerg or terran next since 111 doesnt work then and he will lose just like against idra.But that was a tense game. Hero did mostly everything write there but it came down to two things, loses those phoenixes and also morphing a nexus at the wrong time. really? pretty sure I saw him win 2 games against JYP without the 1-1-1 and we just saw him win game 1 without a 1-1-1. | ||
|
habbey
United States405 Posts
| ||
|
SMD
Canada627 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:02 RJGooner wrote: I can only laugh at the people raging at Puma. Seriously, Hero goes for a proxy stargate and Puma wins the game with great army control and decision making and people give shit for it. Making marines and losing all scvs is a very good terran strategy. | ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:02 me_viet wrote: LOL he 1-1-1'd ONE game out of that series, and I don't think he was planning to all-in, but after the proxy stargate... Cya, hope we don't see you back here. LOL pretty sure he was planning on it when you saw the fast second gas and banshee and cloak BEFORE stargate | ||
|
laharl23
United States582 Posts
On October 09 2011 04:02 kittensrcute wrote: I'm just putting this out there..... If HerO had won...would people not be complaining about cheese? He went proxy Stargate into DTs... But because Terran won, Terran is the ultimate cheeser. It was one base vs one base and cheesy strats on both sides from the start. I understand that people are cheering for the Liquid player and the Protoss hope but I don't know, it just seems silly to me how biased people can be. I don't really enjoy watching games like this, but that's what I took from it. I hate the huge amount of Terrans in GSL too, but I don't get all the Puma hate. if hero won people would freak out because find me one game where pumas 1-1-1 lost. thats all i have to say, its ridiuclous. | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11111 Posts
Thanks Draz! | ||
|
sraelgaiznaer
Philippines423 Posts
i really wished he did forcefielded the ramp and gathered a bigger army instead of expanding. but yeah i still hate that build.  | ||
| ||
