data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
[IEM] Guangzhou - Day 4 - Final Day - Page 206
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Keep enjoying the games. In advance, if you OP whine, see you in a while. If you post well, hopefully see a lot more of you :D <3 | ||
TidusX.Yuna
United States239 Posts
![]() | ||
Jackle
Canada859 Posts
| ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:45 Beyonder wrote: Yep, gotta punish that quick third and even quick FOURTH base somehow :o Second greediest zerg behind ret. Ret probably would have gotten a quick 5th ![]() | ||
Vansetsu
United States1452 Posts
| ||
KeksX
Germany3634 Posts
I'm sorry, but that wasn't well played by delfi, it was just poorly played by IdrA. | ||
mgl0x9
United States256 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:45 -_- wrote: arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh grack is not back . ................. he can't beat that damn warp prism style damn . all it is is elfi playing abusive no biggie tho | ||
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:44 EnderCraft wrote: No it really wasn't. It was a legitimate strat from a really good player. So 1-1-1 isn't legit but this is? They're both fine strats, but they're both all-ins. Nothing wrong with all-ins but call a spade a spade. | ||
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:44 EnderCraft wrote: No it really wasn't. It was a legitimate strat from a really good player. all good strategies are abusive. that's simply the fact of the game. abusive play = good play. | ||
Deekin[
Serbia1713 Posts
| ||
Zooper31
United States5710 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:45 chrisolo wrote: wow now elfi has to go "normal game". He is not playing this for the money, but for the respect of Zooper31 on TeamLiquid.net. Seriously who the f*** cares about the money anyways! Is it really so much to ask for a player not to all-in every single game in the finals? I feel like that is like the smallest thing to ask for as a spectator. | ||
shockaslim
United States1104 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:43 blade55555 wrote: I wish Idra wouldn't go hydra when there are a lot of phoenixes >>. I wish you knew what you were talking about. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
TheRidd
713 Posts
| ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:46 shockaslim wrote: I wish you knew what you were talking about. I do. I wish you did. | ||
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:46 Angelbelow wrote: I think IdrA really had to crush that first attack for that to work. Snowball'd. | ||
snotboogie
Australia3550 Posts
It's all in the game. There is no abuse. | ||
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
I felt like I was watching beta style white-ra there for awhile ![]() | ||
_Sejanus_
Canada94 Posts
| ||
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
On October 04 2011 16:46 shockaslim wrote: I wish you knew what you were talking about. He's right. Reactive Hydra against 2 stargate phoenix is the same as reactive phoenix against mutas. Sucks bad. | ||
| ||